This plague of frogs tells us something hopeful about resistance to Trump

Portland frog costume
A demonstrator in a frog costume stands in front of law enforcement officers in Portland. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

By Anya M. Galli Robertson, Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Dayton

When the center of protests against immigration enforcement switched recently to Charlotte, North Carolina, so did the frogs.

Back in October, an agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency popularly known as ICE, deployed pepper spray into the air vent of a peaceful protester’s inflatable frog costume. Video of the incident in Portland, Oregon, quickly went viral. Frogs and other inflatable costumes became a fixture of protests against Trump administration actions everywhere.

As a sociologist who studies social movements and political discourse, I knew when I saw the video that we’d soon see frogs everywhere at protests.

And indeed, the costumes have visually distinguished recent events from earlier anti-Trump demonstrations, softening their public image at a time when Republican officials were calling protesters “violent” and “Antifa people.”

It’s hard to be violent in a frog suit.

Humor is subversive. When used strategically, it can help undermine the legitimacy of even the most powerful opponents.

Playful and potentially protective

Portland activist Seth Todd began protesting in an inflatable frog costume as a way of “looking ridiculous” when federal law enforcement ramped up repressive tactics against his fellow protesters at ICE facilities.

“Nothing about this screams extremist and violent,” he told The Oregonian newspaper.

Such costumes are interactive, playful, physically unwieldy and potentially protective. They can help activists appear less threatening to police, evade facial recognition systems and even deflect the blows of police batons or rubber bullets.

Wearing inflatable costumes at demonstrations checks all the boxes for tactics that can be widely imitated: cultural relevance, symbolic power, accessibility and easy participation.

My interviews with activists who used glitter bombing in past protests revealed that light-hearted tactics can expand participation by attracting newcomers who are wary of more confrontational forms of protest. This is especially true when the tactics are easy to adopt — notably, wearing inflatable costumes in the weeks leading up to Halloween.

“Protest costumes” are now a category on Amazon.

Unlike the seasoned activists who were early adopters, protesters who wore inflatable animal and character costumes — sometimes because frog costumes had sold out — at No Kings protests on Oct. 18 represented a range of experiences and affiliations, including many first-timers.

“We are middle of the road,” explained one protesting frog in Chicago. “We’re just regular folks who have had enough.”

Bears, unicorns, dinos and raccoons

Activists continue to don frog costumes in solidarity. One group calling itself the Portland Frog Brigade says its goal is “artfully exercising our First Amendment right to free speech.”

Others created Operation Inflation to collect and distribute inflatable costumes to Portland protesters.

Just days after the pepper spray incident, a video circulated showing people outside the Portland ICE facility wearing inflatable bear, unicorn, dinosaur and raccoon costumes, dancing to raucous music in front of a line of law enforcement officers clad in riot gear.

Despite the almost literal novelty value of frog costumes, there’s nothing new about any of this.

Inflatables have long played an important role in outlandish protest tactics. A large inflatable “Trump chicken” was installed outside the White House back in 2017, while a “Trump baby” blimp hovered over Parliament in London during a 2018 state visit.

During the 1960s, the Bread and Puppet Theater used towering puppets and satirical street performances to protest the Vietnam War and social inequality.

Carnivalesque tactics and clown costumes have been popular responses to police repression at anti-globalization protests.

The Raging Grannies were a mainstay at antiwar and antinuclear demonstrations in the early 2000s, easily recognizable with their colorful costumes and witty songs.

And LGBTQ+ rights advocates have thrown pies and glitter-bombed right-wing politicians, while also staging costumed flash mobs and dance parties outside the offices and homes of prominent public figures.

Absurdist performances and playful public displays are powerful tools of political dissent, especially when they stand in contrast to state violence, authoritarianism and human rights abuses.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A columnist for The Guardian argued on Sunday that the meltdown inspired by a new pink J.Crew sweater caused among many fans of the MAGA movement reveals how "fragile" its "sense of masculinity" truly is.

Last week, J.Crew announced the release of a pink "Fair Isle" sweater that The Guardian columnist Ellie Violet Bramley described in a new column as a traditional preppy piece that seems to align with the fashion sensibilities of the conservative right. However, the backlash the sweater received from several prominent MAGA figures, such as Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) and pundit Juanita Broaddrick, revealed a stark contradiction about the movement's views of masculinity.

"From a fashion point of view, it couldn’t be more innocuous," Bramley wrote. "It’s got a crew neck. It’s made from wool. It has a Fair Isle pattern at the upper yoke. There’s nothing asymmetric about it, no fringing or tassels, no slogan blasted across the front; no 'Make America Kind Again.' So what’s the big deal? Reader, the jumper is pink."

Masculinity is one of the key tenets of President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, which promotes an uncompromising view of manhood often imagined by teenage boys, according to an article by Jill Filipovic, an author and contributor to The Atlantic. That version has been described by experts as "performative hypermasculinity," which rejects anything that appears to be feminine.

"Yet the hand-wringing this jumper has provoked about the state of American masculinity seems to be keenly felt," she wrote. "The contradiction, of course, is that any masculinity that feels shaken by a spot of pink on some knitwear is more fragile than it would care to admit."

Read the entire column by clicking here.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump appears to be staring down lame-duck status as the 2026 midterm election approaches, but that doesn't mean his administration will be any less dangerous, even if the GOP gets the thrashing experts expect, according to one ex-GOP analyst.

The president's overall approval rating his at 40% as of November 23, which is down 16 points from when he took office, according to The Economist. Similarly, Americans have largely soured on Trump's domestic and economic policies. Republicans also handed Trump a stern rejection by overwhelmingly supporting legislation to force the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, something the administration tried to prevent by pressuring people like Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) to vote against the bill.

Rick Wilson, a co-founder of The Lincoln Project and a former Republican strategist, argued in a new Substack essay that these issues can lead one to believe things are about to return to normal. However, Wilson warned, Trump is likely to become more dangerous as his support fades.

"Trump is not planning a quiet sunset," Wilson wrote. "He is planning a siege."

The president appears to be laying the groundwork for this siege by appointing people who challenged the legitimacy of the 2020 election to key posts within the federal government.

One such individual is Heather Honey, Trump's deputy assistant secretary for election integrity at the Department of Homeland Security. Honey worked for a state anti-voting group in Pennsylvania and continues to spread the debunked theory that Trump lost the 2020 election because of widespread voter fraud, according to Democracy Docket.

"Trump is already aiming the federal machine at the midterms...If you think a lame duck can’t cause chaos, you didn’t learn the lesson of 2020," Wilson wrote. The lame-duck period then gave Trump and his allies space to organize a coup attempt...Now imagine that same playbook with four years of institutional capture, a more radical staff, and a president who knows he can’t be reelected and doesn’t care who he burns."

"Watch what happens in red state legislatures and courts when Trump calls on them to throw out the election results, or when Mike Johnson declines to seat newly elected members."

Read the entire essay by clicking here.

A Donald Trump ally and confidante on Sunday threatened to reveal the "scandals" of Marjorie Taylor Greene, a MAGA ally who recently feuded with Trump.

Laura Loomer, who has been called the "Trump Whisperer" for her close association with the president, has long feuded with Greene over several different issues. Loomer has sided with Trump as the president has cast Greene out of his orbit, and she further escalated her attacks on the lawmaker over the weekend.

First, Loomer said, "Some people got very angry with me for saying I wish Marjorie Traitor Greene the worst. They told me it was unbecoming. I thought long and hard about this today, as some people I know told me to be better. I’d like to take this moment to let everyone know that in retrospect, I agree. That being said, after consulting with Allah today, I decided I want to wish [Greene] the best in her future career as a CNN contributor and runner up for cohost of the View."

But that was not all.

"A lot of MTGs[sic] enemies are talking to me. Her scandals are not over," Loomer added in a separate X post Sunday before tagging Greene in a direct message. "You’re on notice."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}