Jack Smith 'has a plan to avoid' hurdles thrown up by Aileen Cannon: former Florida judge

At the same time that Judge Aileen Cannon was pressing lawyers for Donald Trump and Department of Justice prosecutors for a timetable to bring the Mar-a-Lago document case to trial, a former Florida judge was telling CNN that he believes special counsel Jack Smith has a "plan" to move forward no matter how Cannon rules.

Speaking with CNN's Dana Bash, Jeff Swartz noted a DOJ lawyer telling Cannon earlier that they plan to pursue the trial of the former president even it bumps up against the November election.

Asked what his takeaway from the hearing was, Swartz stated, "Well, for the notes that we've heard from before that I've been following, the reports that have been coming out, clearly, they're not going to get a July 8 date."

"And I'm not going to hesitate to say that Trump has to be careful because he might get yet what he's asking for, which would open up trial dates for [Judge Tanya] Chutkan after the Supreme Court comes back," he continued, referring to SCOTUS decision to hear Trump's immunity arguments. Those hearings are scheduled for late April.

"So he needs to get something in late August, early September to kind of interfere with that set, that trial being set then."

ALSO READ: ‘America First’ is Trump first, Russia close second

"However, I think that Jack has a backup plan for that, and I think that he'll get what he wants from Chutkan, which is probably sometime in late July, early August," he elaborated. "I anticipate the Supreme Court will wait until the very end of the term to issue their opinion and I think that he has a plan to avoid whatever Judge Cannon does."

Watch below or at the link.

CNN 03 01 2024 12 04 57 youtu.be

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

The Supreme Court's conservative majority has quietly abandoned one of its own legal doctrines — and it did so in the middle of an ongoing election, in the dead of night, and without explanation, according to two lawyers.

The so-called Purcell principle, which the Court has invoked repeatedly over the past several years to protect the rights of minority voters, holds that state legislatures cannot change their election maps when an election is too close. But that principle was just thrown out the door in Louisiana v. Callais, according to legal experts Marc Elias and Joyce Vance.

Elias and Vance discussed the ruling on a new episode of the "Democracy Docket" podcast.

Elias pointed out that the Supreme Court relied on the Purcell principle to block a federal order requiring Alabama to redraw congressional maps that were found to discriminate against Black voters when the primary election was nearly five months away. But that principle was thrown out the window last week when it ruled that state legislatures can gerrymander their election maps on a partisan basis.

The ruling led Republican-controlled states like Louisiana and Alabama to immediately redraw their maps, with Louisiana's governor declaring a state of emergency and disrupting an ongoing election to do so.

"There is no way to explain why Black Alabamians in 2022, when the election was almost five months away, it was too late," Elias said. "But in Louisiana, white Louisianans, when the election is ongoing, get an assist from the Supreme Court, saying it is not too late."

Vance also expressed frustration with the Callais ruling.

"The conservative majority on the Supreme Court must be doing some serious yoga practice to be able to contort themselves into this kind of pretzel logic," Vance said.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump's latest glitch at a small-business event stunned a political analyst on Tuesday.

On May 4, Trump attended a small business event in the East Room at the White House, accompanied by Kelly Loeffler, his Small Business Administration secretary. During the event, Trump appeared to nod off while Loeffler was speaking, and at one point looked like he was sleeping while standing up, according to political analyst David Pakman.

Pakman discussed the event in a new reaction video on YouTube.

"Dear God, he is standing up and falling asleep!" Pakman said. "At another point, an incredibly disoriented Donald Trump, roused from a dream state, says that he could end employment with the swipe of a pen, which shocked people in the room. They are silent because I guess what Trump means is that he could end unemployment. But Trump goes, 'I could end employment with the swipe of a pen.'"

"This man is not well," Pakman added.

Trump's health has been a great concern during his second administration. There have been several instances where Trump was seen sleeping in meetings. His ankles have also shown signs of significant swelling, and bruises repeatedly appear on the back of his hands.

Some psychologists have said Trump may be experiencing symptoms of frontal temporal lobe dementia. Others have speculated that Trump may be showing signs of heart failure.

Pakman noted that Trump's speech at the small business event was "not remotely coherent."

"He says, 'I could end employment.' What?" Pakman said. "Trump then joked about getting out of office eight or nine years from now. I think we should not take the bait on this. That's my instinct."

President Donald Trump's legacy hinges on an issue he has no interest in addressing, according to one of his biographers.

Journalist Michael Wolff argued during a new episode of the "Inside Trump's Head" podcast, co-hosted by Nico Hines, the Daily Beast’s global editorial director, that Trump's war in Iran is shaping up to end a lot like the oil crisis that plagued former President Jimmy Carter long after he left office. Wolff noted that Americans have become increasingly sensitive to rising gas prices resulting from the war, similar to the crisis Carter faced when the former Iranian regime fell, he added.

At the same time, Trump has failed to pay attention to the changing nature of modern warfare, Wolff argued. Not only could that cost the U.S. a decisive victory in Iran, but it could also make Trump a footnote in history.

"So the lesson that everyone should have been learning if they paid attention to Ukraine — which Donald Trump was not doing, was not interested in doing, and rather stubbornly refused to do — is that the nature of warfare was changing," Wolff said.

Wolff added that Trump's team inside the White House has no clue how to respond to the crisis that the president has created.

"Everybody within the white House and within the Trump political team is aware that they don't know what to do about this," Wolff said. "They literally do not know what to do. They don't know how to get us out of the war, and they don't know how to manage this on a political basis."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}