'Striking legal question': State court debates whether cops who rioted on Jan. 6 can hide

'Striking legal question': State court debates whether cops who rioted on Jan. 6 can hide
Capitol rioters on Jan. 6, 2021. (Shutterstock)

Justices on the Washington Supreme Court must decide whether police officers who attended former President Donald Trump's Jan. 6 "Stop the Steal" rally have a right to anonymity, according to a new report.

Six Seattle Police department officers — two of them fired months after the historic Capitol riots in 2021— who attended the riots are at the heart of a new case covered Wednesday by Law & Crime's Brandi Buchman.

"A striking legal question came before justices," she writes. "Must their names — and those results — be revealed to the public?"

Per the report, married former officers Caitlin Everett and Alexander Everett were in the area where rioters were scaling the walls and local police scrambled to fend them off.

"The SPD police chief in 2021, Adrian Diaz, ordered all officers to come forward if they were at the Capitol or attended any related events so they could present themselves for formal scrutiny by the Office of Police Accountability, or OPA," writes Buchman.

"Diaz resoundingly declared it 'absurd' of the couple to suggest that the evidence [Office of Police Accountability] amassed did not show them trespassing directly in a zone where 'they should not be amidst what was already a violent, criminal riot.'"

"It does not appear that any criminal federal charges have been filed against the couple at this time," noted the report. "As for the four other officers, who are all currently on active duty, OPA investigators determined in a final report that three did not violate department policy while a fourth officer’s conduct was deemed inconclusive."

A former law student named Sam Sueoka made public records requests to reveal the officers' identities and more information about them, which prompted the officers to tell courts that they should have a constitutional right to keep that information private.

Lower courts ruled against them, but an appeals court found OPA should consider whether these requests violate the officers' rights — namely, because they were not charged with a crime, but the disclosure of their identities could cause people to associate them with the January 6 rioters, causing harm to their reputations.

A number of people who were arrested for involvement in the Jan. 6 attack are current or former law enforcement, including a former FBI special agent who called for Capitol Police to be killed.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA) told The Daily Beast's Joanna Coles he believes President Donald Trump's cognitive decline is accelerating in a dangerous way, in an interview released this week.

This comes amid ongoing additional questions about the president's mental and physical health, including unexplained bruises on his hands.

"Do you think there has been a decline in his in his speech patterns, in the things that we would look for that might signal that he is aging mentally as well as physically?" asked Coles. "We can see he seems to be shrinking in on himself. He seems to be compressing. But do you feel that he's actually declined, having watched him for the last few years, watched him up close?"

"I mean, again, I'm no doctor, I'm no psychologist, just — I'm no child psychologist, which might be more appropriate for the president, but he definitely seems to be getting worse," said Moulton, who previously ran for president himself in 2020. "He really seems to be getting worse. He seems to be getting more senile."

Moulton turned to the issue of Trump constantly bragging about "acing" the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). "I mean, you don't talk about cognitive tests a lot if you're not taking cognitive tests, and you only take cognitive tests if your doctors are concerned about your cognitive abilities. So he really does seem to be getting senile. I mean ... everyone declines whether we like it or not. And at the, at that age and it's just — it's, I don't know, I think it's, it's just that much more dangerous."

"Most people can see that Donald Trump is dangerous, that he's dangerous for our troops, for our country, for our economy, for our national security," he added. "I mean, there's a long list, but he definitely seems more dangerous now than he was even in his first term."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Donald Trump has been playing the long con with his MAGA cult for over a decade now.

When he descended that tacky gold escalator in June 2015 to declare his candidacy, he essentially set up a traveling game of Three Card Monte that’s never ended. Trump first learned how to grift from his con artist father, then polished his people skills under the close tutelage of Roy Cohn. But he really learned the art of patiently setting up his marks from Vladimir Putin, who immediately capitalized on Trump’s neediness and Daddy Issues when they met soon after Cohn’s death. Daddy Vladdy shrewdly played Trump by complimenting him, then trapping him with blackmail.

Trump acted as a subhuman bridge for Putin to compromise the Republican Party ahead of the 2016 election. What began as a slow process sped up significantly after the Russians hacked the RNC and DNC servers. I’d still love to know what could be so bad that it would make someone turn against the United States of America. No, seriously, we all deserve to know what was found, because a lot of it is probably in the Epstein Files.

And that’s how Trump, who was seen as a buffoon of a joke candidate, was able to get the party to legitimize him while funneling Russian propaganda on social media, which helped convince the MAGA cult that it was okay to bring their worst qualities out into the open. He talks just like me, they proudly tweeted along with their other grammatical errors. What it really meant was: Finally, someone who hates all the same people I do.

Donny Three Card Monte then went full PT Barnum, promising them the world for just a few dollars. But the problem with Trump is that once you give him a dollar, he takes a billion more.

Over the last 10 years, Trump has sold MAGA a lot of crappy merch made in China, from his dumb red hats to everything else he puts his name on. The allegedly devout God-fearing Christians of the MAGA cult happily ignore all of the Commandments when it comes to Donald Jesus Trump, forking over their very hard-earned money for a Bible with his stupid EKG of a signature stamped on the title page.

They bought his ugly gold Trump sneakers. They bought a gold Trump credit card, because why not let him ruin their credit ratings while he’s ruining everything else?

They prepaid for a Trump iPhone that still hasn’t materialized. The grift is literally endless, but there’s no bigger grift than Trump’s ballroom.

I’m still trying to understand how a ballroom at the White House makes anyone in America safer. Is every school in the country getting one to prevent mass shootings? Because Trump made a beeline from yet another “assassination attempt” straight to a press conference that raised more questions than it answered.

Before we get to the shady funding sources for what pundits have dubbed the “Epstein Ballroom,” I’d like to take this opportunity to point out that no one has asked anyone at the White House what happened to the historical artifacts in the East Wing before Trump bulldozed it like the ingrate he is. I can’t imagine anyone on Trump’s staff taking the time to carefully pack away and log every last thing the former First Ladies left for future generations, but NO ONE HAS ASKED THEM about it. So, maybe someone who still has a White House Press pass could take one for the country and ask.

Anyway, Trump first said the money for the ballroom that no one needed came from private donors. Also, any sentence that begins with “Trump said” is immediately followed by a lie. Then he did what he always does: he started slowly increasing the amount the ballroom would cost, without giving any real explanations. But all along, he insisted it was never going to cost the American taxpayers a dime.

Watch him shuffle those cards, my friends! Just as long as you’re not talking about the Epstein Files, Trump wins every time.

CNN actually did its job on Tuesday by releasing a supercut of Trump changing the price of the ballroom, as well as the source of its funding. (It’s also serving as a proper legacy for Ted Turner, who died on Wednesday. If Turner hadn’t been suffering from Lewy Body Dementia, I feel certain he would’ve been more outspoken about politics).

ONE. BILLION. DOLLARS.

For a ballroom.

WHY?

Is there actually going to be one of those awesome tricked-out Doomsday Preppers-type bunkers underneath it, like in all the end-of-the-world movies where the rich people get to keep living in luxury after all the have-nots have been wiped from the face of the Earth?

And what’s the endgame here? What are they planning for? If Trump is going to set off a bunch of nukes because he’s in the Epstein Files, who ends up down there with him? Because it won’t be “MAGAPatriot32570275” or anyone who still shows up for him at his ego rallies.

Seriously, I don’t get all of this Bond villain stuff. What are they going to do if they kill everybody else? Sit in the bunker and watch each other count their useless money?

You can show that CNN supercut to MAGA, but it won’t help change their minds. If they’re still supporting Trump despite all of the evidence in the Epstein Files, it means they’re going to keep clinging to his lies until they stop serving them and start hurting them personally. Maybe it’ll be the record-high grocery, prescription drug, and gas prices, rocketing healthcare premiums, and rent hikes that finally make them realize that Trump has never once cared about them.

I don’t care if people want to be in a cult, but I care very much when it comes with an unspeakable body count and takes a toll on democracy and humanity. I just wish MAGA cared about that too.

President Donald Trump received an almost "psychedelic" rebuke from a foreign leader recently, and that may help explain why he's kicked his revenge tour into high gear, according to one analyst.

Sean Wilentz, co-host of "The Court of History" podcast on the Legal AF Network, argued during a new episode on Wednesday that King Charles III's speech before Congress was a "masterful" repudiation of Trump and his MAGA movement. During the speech, Wilentz argued that the King reminded Americans of the ideas that the country was founded on, which Trump and the MAGAverse have sought to upend.

In one particularly lucid part of the speech, King Charles forcefully rebuked the "blood and soil" anti-immigrant rhetoric spouted by Trump and his MAGA followers, according to Wilentz.

"America was the most polyglot place in the world, really, when it was founded," he said. "It was founded as an immigrant culture with a multitude of different countries, which was very complicated."

"So basically it's bunk. It's nonsense," Wilentz said of the anti-immigrant rhetoric. "But as you say, it's blood and soil. So, it's inventing an American Anglo-American bloodline in the name of excluding everyone else."

"I use this word very sparingly, but it has a quasi fascist aspect to it," he continued. "That's the only way to describe it, but it certainly is a repudiation of everything that America stood for, which it took the King of Great Britain to point out. It's almost psychedelic watching all of this."

Wilentz added that Trump seems to be feeling "cornered" after King Charles's visit, which may explain why he has relaunched his retribution campaign against former FBI Director James Comey.

"Now he's actually been cornered in a terrible, terrible way," Wilentz said. "But nevertheless, his response is not to ... heal the breach or to try to reach out to people or try to unite the country. It's only to divide it even more."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}