Liz Cheney says it's vital GOP loses Congress: 'Cannot be in the majority in 2025'

Liz Cheney says it's vital GOP loses Congress: 'Cannot be in the majority in 2025'
Liz Cheney (ABC screengrab)

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) appeared on "The View" Wednesday to talk about her book and debate politics with the co-hosts.

The conversation began with her saying she's been moved by the reception she's gotten from the rest of the country.

"Because, I think, the challenges that I describe in the book and the challenges that we face, you know, they're ones that I think people across the political spectrum, with the exception of some in the Republican Party, really recognize how grave this threat is."

Co-host Joy Behar cited Cheney's comment that the country is "sleepwalking into a dictatorship." She asked why so many people are still on Donald Trump's side.

"I think part of it is because what he's saying is so horrible, and in a way we've become numb," Cheney began. "And I also think that all of us, as Americans, we've become accustomed to sort of being able to rely on our republic surviving, and so it can become very difficult."

"I hear people on the right saying, 'Oh, you're catastrophizing and exaggerating this threat.' When I said sleepwalking into a dictatorship, it's not really understanding and recognizing how dangerous it would be. For example, to have a president who was unwilling to enforce the rulings of the courts. He was just simply saying that if I don't agree with the court, I'll ignore those rulings. That's the end of the constitutional republic."

Ana Navarro said that there are a lot of Republicans who talk tough but then refuse to back it up with action. She asked Cheney what happened to the conservative ideas she was raised on and how the GOP had strayed so far. She also asked if the GOP could be salvaged.

"Well, I think that, first of all, we don't know. Nobody has voted yet, so we don't know for sure who the nominees are going to be on each side," Cheney said. Donald Trump is currently leading by a considerable amount in Iowa and other early primary states and is favored to be the Republican nominee.

ALSO READ: Judgment year has arrived: Will America pass her greatest test yet or will she fail?

"I think that the Republican Party itself is clearly so caught up in this cult of personality that it's very hard to imagine that the party can survive. I think increasingly it's clear that once we get through 2024, we're going to have to have something else, something new. I believe the country has to have a party that's based on conservative principles and values — where we can engage with the Democrats on substance and on policy," said Cheney.

Alyssa Farah Griffin asked about the House Republicans and noted that she's fearful what happened on Jan. 6 could happen again with some of the same people in charge who were willing to throw out the Constitution.

Cheney made it clear that it is "really important for everybody who is watching to understand that [Speaker] Mike Johnson's (R-LA) argument when he objected to the electoral votes was that he, Mike Johnson, has the authority because he believes that the Constitution was violated in these states. Forget about the fact that he completely ignored the fact that the allegations that were being made had already been rejected by the courts."

She confessed concern after watching Johnson.

He was "ignoring the rulings of the court and ignoring the votes had been certified by governors in all those states, ignoring the law, ignoring the Constitution and making the assertion members of Congress can simply decide they're going to throw out the votes of tens of millions Americans and install the person they want to be president," said Cheney.

"That's why I say as someone who's been a lifelong Republican — Republicans cannot be in the majority in the House of Representatives come Jan. 2025. It's so, so important, and I think that people across the country have to recognize we have to vote for people who believe in the constitution and reject election deniers."

See some of the clips of the show below or at the link here.



For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump's allies in the IRS killed a popular tax filing program this week, which had been piloted under former President Joe Biden's administration, according to a new report.

Washington Post White House and economics reporter Jacob Bogage posted on Bluesky on Tuesday that the IRS had killed the IRS Direct File program, which let users file their taxes for free. The program was launched in 2023 after uproar over the cost of private tax filing services.

The IRS began notifying state agencies on Monday that the service will not be available for the 2026 tax season.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act provided the initial funding to start the pilot program, the Washington Post reported at the time. Since then, reports indicate that about 295,000 people used the pilot.

“There’s something very important about the fact that even beyond making it easy and beyond making it free, this is something you could do directly with your government,” said Gabriel Zucker, associate policy director for tax benefits at the advocacy group Code for America, told the outlet.

👀 Scoop: IRS Direct File, the free government-backed program that let you file your taxes for free, is dead.IRS wrote to state tax agencies saying it would not be operational this coming tax season, per records I've obtained.IRS Direct File: 2023-2025.(Story from when the pilot launched.)

[image or embed]
— Jacob Bogage (@jacobbogage.bsky.social) November 4, 2025 at 2:42 PM
THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) isn't happy with President Donald Trump's Department of Defense, and he's speaking out.

Reuters reported Tuesday that, after so many leaks, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has locked down the Pentagon to the point that no one is allowed to speak to members of Congress without his explicit permission.

"Man, I can't even get a response, and we're on your team," Sullivan said about Elbridge Colby, who handles policy for the Pentagon. He said that it was more difficult to get a response from Colby than from Hegseth or even Trump.

Colby "has been really bad on this. The worst in the administration," Sullivan blasted.

Austin Dahmer sat before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday for his nomination hearing. Among the comments he was asked about was the idea that the U.S. intends to cut troops stationed on the eastern flank of Romania. These are soldiers stationed near the Ukraine border but holding in a NATO country.

Dahmer testified that there was a classified briefing on the matter. That caused some confusion for Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL).

"Can you tell me who did them, the dates ... because I wasn't invited," noted the senator.

Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) interrupted, saying he needs some clarity on the matter as well.

"Where did you get that information?" Wicker asked.

He noted that neither Democrats nor Republicans were invited to this classified briefing. Dahmer said he was told about the briefing by the Pentagon legislative affairs folks and that there must have been "miscommunication."

"We've seen the policy office differ from the president's policy... Is that good for us?" Scott questioned.

Wicker requested that Dahmer get back to them on the record about the matter.

Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen (NV) lamented that the Pentagon has made little effort to reach out to the Senate on defense strategy. That said, the defense strategy appears to be fluid. Reuters recalled that it was just a few months ago that Hegseth stopped a weapons delivery to Urakine, only for Trump to step in and override him. The Pentagon and the White House seem very focused on rebranding the DOD and changing standards for top military officials with beards.

"We see no sense of urgency to relate to Congress. We see no sense of urgency to connect with Congress," Rosen said.

Read the full report here.

The Justice Department took the extremely rare step on Tuesday of notifying a federal judge it would disregard a court order.

Specifically, the judge presiding over the government's criminal bank fraud case against New York Attorney General Letitia James ordered federal prosecutors to provide discovery on James' motion to dismiss the case on vindictive prosecution grounds.

But in a brief filing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Roger Keller told the court that wouldn't be happening.

"The Government provides notice of its intent not to provide vindictive/selective prosecution-related discovery prior to Defendant’s motion because the law does not 'allow[ ] a defendant to have discovery on the government’s prosecutorial decisions [until] the defendant ... overcome[s] a significant barrier by advancing objective evidence tending to show the existence of prosecutorial misconduct. The standard is a ‘rigorous’ one.' Wilson, 262 F.3d at 315 (quoting Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 468)," said the filing. "Until Defendant meets her threshold requirements, the Court’s instruction to produce any vindictive/selective prosecution-related discovery is premature."

Legal experts were taken aback at this response to a federal judge.

"Unusual filing in Tish James case," wrote Politico legal analyst Josh Gerstein on X. "DOJ says it isn't complying with judge's order to turn over discovery on selective prosecution issue. Usual procedure would be move to reconsider the order but prosecutors file 'notice' telling judge no."

This comes after Trump's acting U.S. attorney, Lindsey Halligan, has made a number of other missteps in the case. She was appointed under legally dubious circumstances, to the point that the DOJ has taken the step of proactively endorsing her appointment and the charges she is bringing, to try to avert a federal court disqualifying her.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}