'Unfit to hold office': Marjorie Taylor Greene tries to censure Dem for 'insurrection'

'Unfit to hold office': Marjorie Taylor Greene tries to censure Dem for 'insurrection'
(Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) offered a resolution on Thursday to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib (R-MI) for what she said was an "insurrection."

Greene brought the resolution to the House floor after Tlaib participated in a peaceful protest at the Capitol to call for a ceasefire in Gaza.

"A resolution censuring Representative Rashida Tlaib for anti-Semitic activity, sympathizing with terrorist organizations, and leading an insurrection at the United States Capitol Complex," Greene said, reading her resolution. "Whereas by leading an anti-American and anti-Semitic insurrection on October 18, 2023, Rashida Tlaib followed Hezbollah's orders to carry out a day of unprecedented anger, following an explosion at a Gazan hospital, lying about Israel's responsibility for the attack, which United States intelligence agencies said was not perpetrated by Israel."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

"And whereas members of Congress who denounce the United States while praising terrorist organizations are unfit to hold office," she continued. "Now, therefore, be it resolved that Representative Rashida Tlaib be censured."

The chair ruled that the full House would consider Greene's resolution at a later date.

Watch the video below.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

The Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister said Wednesday that a Trump administration official did not give the real story about what prompted the war with Iran.

Majid Takht-Ravanchi told MS NOW anchor Ana Cabrera that Iran has continued to defend itself and its civilians after the surprise attack from the United States and Israel started on Saturday. He said that Iran has not received any messages from the United States and that Iran has also not sent any messages following the failed negotiations in February, saying that the Trump administration had not clearly represented what happened during those talks.

President Donald Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, had claimed that Iran had enough enriched uranium to develop 11 nuclear bombs — something Takht-Ravanchi argued was not the case, citing what happened during the two instances in Geneva last month.

"No... it is no secret," Takht-Ravanchi said. "This is based on the information which appears in different IAEA atomic energy organization, international atomic energy organization, which says that Iran is in the possession of this amount of 60% material. So this is no secret, but the point is that that amount of 60% enrichment, if it is enriched to a higher degree, that would amount to 10.2 bombs, that did not mean that we were looking for, you know, possessing 10.2 nuclear bombs. We were telling the American delegation that this is the assessment by the European experts, that this amount of 60% enriched uranium can deliver around 10.2 nuclear bombs. But they did not say that we are going to use them. We did not say even that we wanted to enrich that amount to a higher degree."

Takht-Ravanchi claimed that Witkoff had misrepresented what was said during the negotiations.

“In that first meeting, both the Iranian negotiators said to us directly, with no shame, that they controlled 460 kilograms of 60%,” Witkoff had said in the Fox interview. “And they’re aware that that could make 11 nuclear bombs, and that was the beginning of their negotiating stance.”

“They were proud of it,” Witkoff said. “They were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight protocols to get to a place where they could deliver 11 nuclear bombs.”

Takht-Ravanchi, along with other diplomats, has suggested that his description of this important conversation was false, MS NOW reported.

"The point that Mr. Witkoff was trying to convey was that Iran was bragging about this nuclear material that is in our possession, and that was the reason that the talks didn't succeed," Takht-Ravanchi said. "That was not true at all."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!


When Mark Ludwig lost shared custody of his son more than a decade ago, his life fell apart.

“The devastation of losing my son who was my sole purpose in life, I couldn’t function,” Ludwig, who lives in the St. Louis area, told the Missouri House Children and Families Committee in late January. “I lost everything from the point where I went from being a pretty decent middle class dad to where I was eating food out of dumpsters at the Aldi… I didn’t know where to turn.”

Now Ludwig advocates for fathers to be treated equally in the court system. He also drives for Uber in St. Louis where he chats up other dads, many of whom he said share stories of being raised without a present.

“You’ve got some dads who’ve become disengaged because they feel undervalued,” Ludwig said. “They feel like they’re unappreciated, they feel pushed out. Like their role isn’t important, so why even try.”

Ludwig hopes legislation filed by state Rep. Jamie Gragg, an Ozark Republican, can help both uplift and prepare more dads who find themselves unsure how to navigate fatherhood.

As he stood before his House colleagues Monday, Gragg listed off example after example of statistics faced by children raised without a father: higher levels of depression, homelessness, substance use, teen pregnancy, incarceration, suicide.

“It is heartbreaking, it is devastating,” Gragg said. “It’s an epidemic.”

Gragg’s bill would create the “Missouri Fathership Project” within Missouri’s Department of Social Services. It would help fund positions at statewide nonprofits and community organizations to support dads who want to “reestablish and strengthen relationships with their children.” These professionals would help fathers navigate the court system, job applications or the foster system, for example, so they can be more present fathers.

“This will enable community organizations, nonprofits around the state to bind together and reach out and help those fathers who want to be fathers, but just have too many road blocks in the way,” Gragg said.

The House passed the bill on a 141 to 4 vote Monday night. It now heads to the state Senate.

Tim McConville, the director of strategic engagement with Man Up and Go, a Christian-based nonprofit that aims to end “fatherlessness” around the world, is already acting in a pseudo-role.

McConville, who is based out of Missouri and testified in support of the bill in January, said he often gets requests from children’s division asking if he can help out fathers navigating relationships with their children in the foster care system. This might mean helping them keep track of court dates, find secure housing or work through common parenting dilemmas.

He also helps fathers connect with resources after they’re reunited with their kids, as is the case with one of his current clients.

“He’s a single dad taking care of his two kids,” McConville said. “That’s when it gets hard, let’s be honest.”

While the nonprofit’s fatherhood initiative in Florida — where similar legislation was first passed in 2022 — has 26 people on staff, McConville said in Missouri, he’s the only one doing the work locally. This legislation would allow the organization to expand how many fathers it can help by hiring more staff.

A specialist hired through this program might be assigned to help a father who is struggling to comply with a court-ordered case plan, for example.

The legislation makes economic sense, and it can prevent children who have access to a safe home from being traumatized by family separation, said state Rep. Raychel Proudie, a Democrat from Ferguson. And it helps the whole family.

“To be pro-father isn’t to be anti-mother,” Proudie said Monday on the House floor. “It’s very rare that we give some kind of dedicated attention to males or men who are out here trying to be a part, a healthy part, not just present … ”

An amendment introduced by state Rep. David Dolan, a Republican of Sikeston, was added to the bill before it passed out of the House. This amendment would allow any fathers participating in the project who are also complying with court orders and who make regular child support payments to apply for license they may have previously lost, particularly if they were recently incarcerated. This includes limited drivers licenses, hunting and fishing licenses and professional and occupational licenses.

Dolan, a former circuit judge, said fathers often came before his court for nonpayment of child support.

“They would look at me and say, ‘I’m doing the best I can, but how do you expect me to pay this support if I can’t get a job or if I can’t get to a job,’” Dolan said.

State Rep. Bryant Wolfin of Ste. Genevieve was among the four Republicans to vote against the bill Monday afternoon.

“I’m not entirely sure that I’m comfortable with government trying to mold society into being better people,” Wolfin told Gragg during House debate. “Ultimately at the end of the day that’s what this bill is trying to do.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MA) berated Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for allegedly misusing her department's resources to purchase luxury jets and forcing staff to protect her "special blanket."

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Raskin confronted Noem's controversial management of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

"We're glad to meet you, even though it's been 13 months since you took office and more than five weeks since two American citizens were shot dead in Minneapolis," the Maryland Democrat began, explaining that DHS agents shot protesters Renee Good and Alex Pretti to death without good cause. "Madam Secretary, you've provided no evidence to back up your defamatory lie against either of these American citizens. There have been three homicides in Minneapolis in '26. Your agents committed two of them."

"And while you make a daily mockery of our courts and our Constitution, you're treating the billions of dollars our colleagues showered on your department like a personal slush fund. You budgeted an astonishing $220 million for media consultant contracts so you can star in self-promoting photo shoots," he continued. "You're living rent-free in the official waterfront residence reserved for the commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard."

"You spent $172 million to buy not one, but two luxury jets for your travel, and now you're using taxpayer funds to lease a third jet, a $70 million luxury 737 Max, with a queen-sized bedroom in the back, a deluxe serving bar, and four flat-screen TVs."

Raskin then told a story of what he called "an airborne episode of entitlement, arrogance, and contempt that I could hardly believe."

"Apparently, when your special blanket, your blankie, was left on one of the government jets and not transported over to the new one, your special government employee, Corey Lewandowski, chivalrously stepped forward to fire the pilot, midair, a 2003 Coast Guard Academy graduate and distinguished U.S. Coast Guard commander," he noted. "But then he had to be rehired immediately because there was no one else who could fly the two of you on the rest of the journey back home."

"Secretary Noem, you're flying high now, maybe even a little bit too close to the sun," Raskin added. "But with all these free planes and houses and pilots, you've traveled a long distance from your actual job and the things you should be doing as head of Homeland Security."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}