Even red states are refusing to fork over voter data to Trump's DOJ: report

Even red states are refusing to fork over voter data to Trump's DOJ: report
Members of the audience wear MAGA hats as they attend the 2026 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Grapevine, Texas, U.S., March 26, 2026. REUTERS/Daniel Cole

The Department of Justice's request to obtain and use sensitive voter information is receiving pushback from typically Trump-friendly states, according to a report.

The Guardian reported that at least five red states have refused to hand over voter information, including driver's license numbers and partial social security numbers.

The DOJ has not clearly stated its motives for wanting voter data.

In a Rhode Island courtroom hearing, the DOJ explained it planned to share data with the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, and run it through its Save database, a faulty database intended to verify citizenship. The Guardian found internal Justice Department emails published in a recent lawsuit that verify the DOJ’s plan.

Voting experts have expressed alarm, fearing Trump's false, stolen election claims and the DHS’s unreliable database could be used to challenge the 2026 midterm election results. In April, voting rights groups sued the administration for the same reason.

The Guardian found, as of April 1, the DOJ has sued 30 states and the District of Columbia for failing to turn over full copies of their voter registration lists. The lawsuit includes blue and purple states like California, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Arizona, and Michigan, where pushback has occurred. But it also includes typical strongholds for the Trump administration, like Utah, Georgia, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Idaho.

According to the Guardian, in their refusal to hand over voter information, Republican states argue their constitutionally guaranteed authority over election administration. They also expressed concerns over data security, privacy laws and the overall questionable legal grounds of the DOJ’s request.

The Brennan Center's Eileen O'Connor characterized the DOJ effort as aimed at undermining elections, while democracy experts noted the officials face pressure between principle and political considerations.

West Virginia, Utah, and Idaho officials have refused data transfers, arguing the requests violate state law and lack clear legal justification. Some states, including Mississippi, South Dakota, and Tennessee, complied with data demands but refused to sign agreements authorizing voter roll purges.

Only two states signed the full memorandum of understanding, reports CNN.

Election officials argue that states manage voter rolls more effectively than federal agencies. Though these officials typically support Trump, federal election interference crosses a line they won't accept, reflecting concerns about mass disenfranchisement and improper data handling, including past security breaches involving Social Security numbers.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A defecting MAGA influencer blasted Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk for claiming that remarks made about her were "dehumanizing."

Ashley St. Clair posted a video on TikTok on Friday where she argued that plenty of "dehumanization" took place after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and Erika's husband.

"They got people fired. They have not followed up with these people. They have no idea of the damage they did to these people's lives because they got them fired from their jobs," St. Clair said, referring to people who lost their jobs because they expressed opinions about Charlie Kirk's death that Erika and Turning Point USA didn't like.

"There's a professor who won't get tenure because they disagreed with her sentiments on the death of Charlie," St. Clair said. "All of this is in the name of honoring a man who was killed, but if you want my real opinion, I don't think anything has been more dehumanizing and disrespectful to a dead man."

St. Clair added that Erika Kirk should be speaking out against the Trump administration, "arresting Don Lemon, and MAGA is cheering. We have an administration who is arresting James Comey." St. Clair delivered a message directly to Kirk in her video.

"And you want to sit here and talk about dehumanization?" St. Clair asked. "Do you think Don Lemon and James Comey are our biggest issues? Why aren't you speaking out about that? Are you only speaking out when people are saying nice things about you? "

Her last message was to the rest of MAGA. "I encourage people within MAGA to look at what's really happening in this country," St. Clair said.


@ashstc and sunset the charlie kirk show for the love of all that is holy #grwm ♬ original sound - ashley st. clair
THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The far-right Daily Wire faced mass layoffs this week — gutting the team of the long-prominent outlet initially founded by conservative activist Ben Shapiro.

According to The Wrap, "Ben Shapiro’s right-wing media company confirmed the layoffs in a statement to media on Friday afternoon, saying that impacted staffers are 'a number of teams' and layoffs were largely concentrated to its Nashville headquarters. 'Today, The Daily Wire made a difficult decision to restructure the organization, which included layoffs to a number of teams,' a spokesperson said."

The Daily Wire has been the focus of drama in previous years, one of the biggest incidents being the firing of right-wing star Candace Owens for pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories.

The news of the sharp cutbacks led to an immediate reaction on social media.

"Despite the press releases the Daily Wire was pushing to billionaires' blogs that few people read, it's been an open secret in the media that the Daily Wire was crashing," wrote BCC Communications founder Mitchell Jackson, adding, "Many smart people worked there."

"I’ll say this about The Daily Wire layoffs," wrote Democratic strategist Mike Nellis. "When I did their show Bar Fight back in February, the folks I met who were just regular people working there (hair, makeup, production) were very nice and professional. I imagine a lot of them have families, and I’m sending some love to them, even if we have political disagreements."

A federal appeals court dealt a severe blow to abortion access Friday, temporarily reinstating a nationwide requirement that women obtain abortion pills in person, significantly curtailing mail-order access to medication abortion for millions of Americans.

The ruling from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, written by Trump-appointed Judge Kyle Duncan, is a major victory for the anti-abortion movement. While the ruling does not ban Mifepristone outright, women can no longer obtain it through telehealth appointments or by mail while the case proceeds.

"Referring to Louisiana abortion prohibitions, they wrote that the current federal regulations create 'an effective way for an out-of-state prescriber to place the drug in the hands of Louisianans in defiance of Louisiana law,'" CNN reported.

Medication abortion now accounts for roughly two-thirds of all abortions in the United States. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, women have been able to obtain mifepristone through telehealth visits without an in-person doctor's appointment, an option the Biden administration formally enshrined in 2023 rules. Friday's temporary ruling significantly curtails that access.

The FDA conceded its prior regulations were marred by "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration" — and launched a review of mifepristone protocols in September that remains incomplete. The appeals court ruled that the ongoing review was not sufficient reason to leave the regulations in place.

The case was brought by Louisiana, which argued that mail-order abortion pills were undermining the state's near-total abortion ban. The court agreed, ruling that federal regulations created an end-run around Louisiana's prohibition.

The ACLU immediately condemned the decision.

“This decision defies clear science and settled law and advances an anti-abortion agenda that is deeply unpopular with the American people,” Julia Kaye, senior staff attorney for the Reproductive Freedom Project of the ACLU, said in a statement. “For countless people, especially those who live in rural areas, face intimate partner violence, or live with disabilities, losing a telemedicine option will mean losing access to this vital medication altogether.”

The ruling comes despite years of data showing mifepristone is overwhelmingly safe, with fewer reported side effects than Viagra or penicillin, according to a CNN analysis.

The case is expected to continue in lower courts before potentially returning to the Supreme Court, which previously ruled on standing issues in a related challenge two years ago.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}