Republican broadside on major national monument triggers alarms

Republican broadside on major national monument triggers alarms
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT). (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Republican US Sen. Mike Lee, a leading proponent of selling off the country’s public lands, moved Wednesday to begin the process expediting an attack on the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in his home state of Utah, drawing outrage from conservationists who vowed to pull out all the stops to protect the national treasure.

Lee kick-started the process by entering a recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) opinion into the congressional record. Last month, the GAO determined that a Biden-era management plan aimed at shielding Grand Staircase-Escalante constitutes a rule under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which gives lawmakers a limited time to undo federal rules after they are finalized.

In the coming days, Lee and his allies are expected to introduce a resolution of disapproval under the CRA in an effort to roll back the monument management plan. CRA resolutions are privileged and not subject to the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster, meaning Republicans could pass the measure without any Democratic support.

Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-Utah), who requested the GAO opinion, is leading the House effort to repeal the Grand Staircase-Escalante management plan.

Tom Delehanty, senior attorney with Earthjustice’s Rocky Mountain office, said in a statement Thursday that “the fate of our public lands, including our precious national monuments, should not be left to a handful of politicians who want to turn them over to industry.”

“While this may be the first CRA attack on a national monument, it will not be the last if members of Congress on both sides of the aisle don’t stand up to oppose it,” Delehanty warned. “Sen. Lee’s use of this arcane law would throw out years of planning by local officials, Tribes, and communities, setting a dangerous precedent on public land protection. Anyone who values our public lands and national monuments should take note.”

The legal director of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Steve Bloch, said the GOP’s escalating attack on Grand Staircase-Escalante “is a call to action for Americans from across the nation.”

“This wild landscape is quintessential southern Utah redrock country with its stunning geology, irreplaceable cultural resources, unique fossils, and wide-open spaces,” said Bloch. “All of that is at risk if this attack succeeds and the monument management plan is undone. We intend to move heaven and earth to stop that from happening.”

During his first term in the White House, President Donald Trump launched a massive assault on Grand Staircase-Escalante, shrinking it by nearly 50%—a move that former President Joe Biden reversed.

But the Washington Post reported last year that the Trump administration has considered assailing the national monument yet again as part of a broader push to open the nation’s public lands to commercial activity and industry exploitation.

Dan Ritzman, Sierra Club’s director of conservation, said Thursday that congressional Republicans’ use of the CRA to gut protections for Grand Staircase-Escalante is “unprecedented” and “unlawful.”

“Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is one of this country’s most treasured public landscapes, and the public has been involved from advocating for its protection to organizing its long-term management,” said Ritzman. “Overturning this plan erases years of public engagement and Tribal consultation, and threatens certainty for everyone who uses and enjoys this iconic landscape.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed her closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee in New York on Thursday "got quite unusual" after Republicans began asking her questions about conspiracy theories.

Speaking to reporters after the deposition, Clinton claimed that Republicans asked her the same questions "over and over again." She added that Republicans asked her about Pizzagate, a conspiracy theory that claimed a pedophile ring was being run out of a pizza shop in New Jersey, and whether or not UFOs are real.

"I think they could have spent the day more productively," she said.

Clinton appeared for a nearly six-hour closed-door deposition on Thursday as part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation into disgraced financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein.

At one point, the deposition was temporarily paused after Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) sent photos to MAGA influencer Benny Johnson from inside the hearing room.

In her statement to the press, Clinton said she is not going to sit for another deposition. She also questioned why Republicans haven't questioned people with ties to Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, like former Victoria's Secret CEO Leslie Wexner.

Wexner sat for a nearly five-hour deposition earlier this month. No Republicans attended the hearing.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A Democratic lawmaker Thursday revealed several insights about what happened inside the room where former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was pressed by the House Oversight Committee about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein — explaining she did not know him.

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) told CNN anchor Jake Tapper that Clinton explained she had never met the late financier and convicted child sex offender, and she did not have a relationship with his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

"We would like the transcript to be released within 24 hours because the reality is she ran circles around the Republicans the entire time," Subramanyam said. "It's still going and she's answering every single question being asked. But the reality is we should be interviewing people who actually had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who knew the guy, who at least met the guy and know about his crimes. There's so many people in the files and Hillary Clinton is not someone we should be focusing on."

Subramanyam brought up how zero Republicans attended Les Wexner's testimony in Ohio last week, yet 11 Republicans were in upstate New York on Thursday. He also called out Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) for taking photos and sending them to a MAGA influencer who posted them during the closed-door meeting and violating the committee's rules, and pausing the entire testimony.

"This is a closed-door deposition. This isn't a family vacation. I don't know why she's secretly snapping photos," Subramanyam said.

"She demanded that if you're going to snap photos privately, why not let the entire media in? That was their demand, actually, to make up for it, but again, Republicans refused to do that," Subramanyam said. "This is a political sideshow. This did not help our investigation at all."

Subramanyam said it was time for the Trump administration to release the full files and that the president should testify, along with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

"I wish the press could have come in and just watched the whole thing," Subramanyam said. "I think what they would have seen and what the American public would have seen was basically Republicans embarrassing themselves. Some of the questions had nothing to do with Epstein and Maxwell, and our investigation, and were very much irrelevant to it. And so, again, this was perhaps part of the plan, was to sort of shift the blame and shift the tension from [President Donald] Trump and the Republicans to a Democrat like Hillary Clinton. But the reality was that she simply never met the guy, and it was a waste of our time."

Tapper mentioned that there were reportedly questions from lawmakers about the Pizzagate conspiracy theory and UFOs, and asked if those were actual questions in the hearing. Subramanyam said he could not reveal what was said, but that the video transcript could shed more light on what happened in the closed-door testimony.

"The transcript will be very revealing about that," Subramanyam said.

President Donald Trump is likely to try to derail the electoral process this year — but just as likely to hit hard opposition every step of the way, Michael Waldman of the Brennan Center for Justice told MS NOW's Nicolle Wallace on Thursday's edition of "Deadline: White House."

This follows reporting that Trump just received a 17-page memo from his allies outlining how he could declare a state of emergency to seize election equipment.

"I mean, Michael, it seems that the immunity decision protects him from being criminally prosecuted for doing that, but it doesn't make that which is unconstitutional lawful," said Wallace. "What is in the system? What remains in the system as an antibody to protect against his unconstitutional conduct?"

"Well, you're exactly right," said Waldman. "The Constitution is very clear. States run elections. Congress has a legitimate role in passing national legislation. Presidents have no role."

"And already this year, as we've seen, this campaign, to try to undermine the midterms, courts have stepped up," said Waldman. "He had an executive order last year purporting to take personal control of elections and require people to produce a passport, not even a birth certificate, but a passport. And it was blocked by the courts, which said it was illegal. There's no legal basis for any of these things that are being reported, and this notional executive action claiming Chinese influence in 2020, it seems to be based on sort of whackadoodle theories by election deniers with no basis in reality."

"Courts are willing to step up and states have a role as well. They run the elections," Waldman added. "So I do think that if we are aware, if we're calling out these efforts and if we all do what we need to do, we can have secure and free and fair and hopefully uneventful, uneventful elections in November."

- YouTube youtu.be

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}