KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The email from a nurse manager about a patient's death from COVID-19 "grabbed me," CoxHealth system director of public relations said. It told the vivid story of what health care workers in the Ozarks are facing as hospital beds are filling again, this time with cases from the delta variant. The numbers are skyrocketing in Branson and rural areas, and the vaccination rate is so low it's made national news. So Kaitlyn McConnell wrote about the email and posted it on the health system's Facebook page Wednesday night. "A patient we had yesterday is tragically not with us today,...
Appointing a special prosecutor to probe Capitol rioters' congressional contacts is 'warranted': Ex-FBI agent
Former FBI agent and current Yale professor Asha Rangappa addressed online discussions about ways to investigate the members of Congress who have been accused of helping plan the "Stop the Steal" rally that preceded the attack on the United States Capitol.
One idea is for the DOJ to appoint a special prosecutor, so that if the House flips to Republicans after the 2022 midterm election, the investigations cannot be stopped by a new GOP speaker.
"It's warranted," Rangappa wrote on Twitter. "Contrary to what some have suggested, a conflict of interest is not a requisite for appointing a special counsel. Appropriate grounds include that an independent prosecutor would be in the 'public interest' or that there are 'extraordinary circumstances.'"
It would also show that the investigation was a priority for the Justice Department during a time when Attorney General Merrick Garland has been accused by some Democrats of not caring about the political corruption of the previous administration.
"Right now, it's possible that DOJ is investigating, but since by necessity this is under wraps it leaves the public speculating and increasingly cynical about the DOJ," she said. "It could [also] provide for a more efficient investigation. DOJ has a lot of things on its plate. A special counsel allows dedicated resources for a specified investigative scope. An SC would be able to have FBI agents and prosecutors detailed to focus on this one matter."
She doesn't think that the investigation would be a conflict of interest for Garland, but she noted that he would be right to be concerned about the "appearance" of being politically motivated.
"An SC provides an important buffer and even AG is required to give great deference to SC," she continued.
Rangappa went on to explain that there are rules outlining the way a special counsel reports prosecutorial decisions to Congress and to the public, which a regular investigation doesn't.
"This last point is incredibly important, especially in the event of *declinations to prosecute*, because it allows for the detailing of legal reasons for doing so in a report that can be made public at the AG's discretion. To do so in a 'regular' investigation can backfire," she explained.
The cons, she explained, are that anyone subject to investigation would essentially have a "heads up" on whether they'd be subject to the investigation. That could ultimately make an impact on whether or not the investigation is effective. Quiet investigations usually uncover more information, she said.
The other problem is that the right will relentlessly attack that special counsel the same as they did with Robert Mueller.
While those are the only two "cons" mentioned by Rangappa, she noted that they're pretty big ones. The excuse that the DOJ doesn't want to appear political is absurd, she explained, because if they find evidence and use it to prosecute, then it will be painted by the right as political.
"I think the downsides of internal DOJ investigation vs. SC are about the same, while upsides to SC are many," she concluded. "Of course, the downside to DOJ not investigating at all is a complete loss of faith in the idea that no one is above the law -- so I hope that is not an option."
In hindsight, she also said that Garland should have appointed a special prosecutor from his first day in office to simply remove the presumption of politics.
On Monday, Florida Politics reported that Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is hemorrhaging campaign money ahead of the 2022 election, as he continues to face scrutiny in a federal sex trafficking investigation.
"Donations for the quarter included $495,910 in individual donations, and the Congressman pretty much swore off PAC money last year. In the cycle to date, he has pulled in an impressive $4.26 million in contributions from people across the country," reported Jacob Ogles. "But donations took a significant decline after news of a still-unresolved sex scandal. Gaetz raised $1.83 million in the first quarter of the year, when he spent $1.35 million. Then in the second quarter, he raised $1.46 million, but burned through $1.95 million. That means in total, he pulled in $3.8 million since the dawn of 2021, but has spent $3.92 million."
Gaetz has been under investigation for months, in connection with a county tax official, Joel Greenberg, with whom he allegedly paid to transport a teenage girl over state lines. The identity of this girl has not been revealed, and Gaetz denies any of this happened.
There is currently no indication that Gaetz is a criminal target of federal prosecutors, although the DOJ has recently added two high-profile investigators to the probe. Embroiled in the controversy, Gaetz has allowed his law license to lapse.
Plaintiffs in a landmark civil trial that began today in Charlottesville, Va. will try to prove that organizers of the deadly Unite the Right rally four years ago conspired to commit racially motivated violence.
But as the trial got underway on Monday, controversy surrounding prospective jurors' negative views of "Antifa" sent an ominous signal about the prospect of defendants deflecting blame.
Richard Spencer, the one-time figurehead of the alt-right, and neo-Nazi Christopher Cantwell, who is currently serving an active prison sentence on a separate matter, are representing themselves.
Jason Kessler, the local organizer of the Unite the Right rally, and Nathan Damigo, founder of Identity Evropa were represented by two lawyers in court.
Other lawyers are representing James Alex Fields Jr., who is currently serving a life sentence for murder in the car attack that killed Heather Heyer; Matthew Heimbach and Matthew Parrott of Traditionalist Worker Party; Michael Hill and Michael Tubbs of League of the South; and Jeff Schoep, former commander of National Socialist Movement.
Defendants Augustus Sol Invictus, Robert "Azzmador" Ray, Andrew Anglin, Elliott Kline, Vanguard America, Loyal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and East Coast Knights of the Ku Klux Klan did not appear in the courtroom or have lawyers present to defend them.
Two days before the start of the trial, the plaintiffs requested that Cantwell be severed from the other defendants, in consideration of his due-process arguments, suggesting he could be tried at a later date when he is no longer incarcerated. Cantwell said in open court on Monday that he opposed being severed from the case, and Judge Moon denied the motion in accordance with his wishes.
While the plaintiffs' request was turned down, the matter afforded them the opportunity to head off a post-trial appeal by Cantwell. Roberta Kaplan, one of the lead attorneys for the plaintiffs, told Judge Norman K. Moon the request to sever Cantwell from the other defendants was made to balance the need to move forward with the trial after four years against Cantwell's "legitimate right to have documents in real time — or as in real time as possible — to prepare."
She added, "If he opposes being severed from the case, we believe he has waived any due process argument for appeal."
Going into the trial, the plaintiffs have harbored concern that negative views of "Antifa" could prejudice jurors against holding the white supremacist organizers of Unite the Right responsible for the violence that ensued during the rally. In a motion filed on the eve of the trial, the plaintiffs requested that the court automatically excuse "any prospective jurors who hold extreme views about 'Antifa' and its members."
During voir dire on Monday, Judge Moon asked prospective jurors who had expressed negative views about "Antifa" on their questionnaires if they were able to set aside what other counter-protesters may have done, and "try the case between these plaintiffs and these defendants." Moon reminded some of the prospective jurors that the plaintiffs were not "Antifa."
Karen Dunn, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs, told Judge Moon she didn't think his questioning on jurors' views of "antifa" was sufficient.
"People with extreme views of antifa may be less inclined to believe that defendants could be responsible and more inclined to believe defendants' claims of self-defense," Dunn said.
Judge Moon dismissed Dunn's concern, suggesting that counsel for plaintiffs and defendants confer to mutually agree upon jurors that should be excused because their responses exhibited bias towards one party or the other.
The court seated a prospective juror who told the court he views "antifa" as "involving themselves in racial riots and stuff and causing a lot of problems." While questioning the juror, Moon clarified: "No one is claiming that any member of antifa is a party in this case."
Cantwell indicated that, in fact, he does plan to claim during trial that at least one plaintiff is involved with "Antifa."
"It's actually my understanding that one plaintiff is an adherent or at least a sympathizer of Antifa," Cantwell interjected, referring to Seth Wispelwey, a United Church of Christ pastor who organized an interfaith clergy group to protest the Unite the Right rally.
(The plaintiffs have stated for the record that they are not members of Antifa.)
In response, Judge Moon admitted his lack of knowledge about the antifascist movement, saying, "I don't know the structure of Antifa. Do they have members sign up?"
Dunn jumped in, continuing to press her case: "Mr. Cantwell's argument underscores why it would be wrong to have people with extreme views about Antifa on the jury."
Later, as Moon questioned another juror who said she believes Antifa is a "terrorist organization," Dunn said she was concerned about the juror's ability to be impartial considering that Cantwell plans to draw connections between the plaintiffs and Antifa.
Moon suggested he wouldn't allow the defendants to pursue that argument without evidence.
"If you have evidence, bring it," he said.
"I intend to ask, Mr. Wispelwey if he tweeted, 'Jesus was Antifa,'" Cantwell said. "Because, in fact, he did."
Moon declined to excuse the juror for cause, but the plaintiffs later used one of their peremptory strikes to keep her off the jury.
Moon dismissed another juror who said he views Antifa as "terrorists" and that he did not believe he could set aside his opinion.
Judge Moon dismissed a Black woman from the jury for cause. A school bus driver, the woman wrote on her questionnaire that she had "feelings towards hate groups that disrupt the peace." Under questioning by Judge Moon about whether she could set aside her own opinions and follow the evidence to reach a fair decision about the defendants, the woman said, "I would think I could. I don't know. I have so much personal opinion. I know how to be fair and listen. I don't know why that's difficult for me to explain. I would like to think that I could. But a hundred percent? I don't know."
The juror caught Spencer's attention. During the lunch break, a hot mic caught him saying, "The bus driver who couldn't answer the question — that strikes me as a cause."
When defense counsel formally objected, Dunn noted to the court that she was the only minority on the first of four panels to seat the jury. Moon responded that he gave the woman an opportunity during questioning to convince him that she could put her personal beliefs aside to render an impartial judgement solely on the evidence.
"I felt I went as far as I could to rehabilitate her, and I feel she did not," the judge said. "I'm going to excuse her for cause."
By the end of the day on Monday, which ended with a deluge outside the courthouse in Charlottesville, Judge Moon had seated seven jurors from two panels. He said he plans to call two more panels tomorrow, but said jury selection could run over to Wednesday morning, adding that he would like to have opening statements on Wednesday afternoon.
Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.
$95 / year — Just $7.91/month
I want to Support More
$14.99 per month