NASA unveils probe bound for Jupiter's possibly life-sustaining moon

NASA unveils probe bound for Jupiter's possibly life-sustaining moon
Jupiter's icy moon Europa (AFP)

U.S. space scientists on Thursday unveiled the interplanetary probe NASA plans to send to one of Jupiter's icy moons as part of humanity's hunt for extra-terrestrial life.

The Clipper spacecraft is due to blast off in October bound for Europa, one of dozens of moons orbiting the Solar System's biggest planet, and the nearest spot in our celestial neighborhood that could offer a perch for life.

"One of the fundamental questions that NASA wants to understand is, are we alone in the cosmos?" Bob Pappalardo, the mission's project scientist told AFP.

"If we were to find the conditions for life, and then someday actually find life in a place like Europa, then that would say in our own solar system there are two examples of life: Earth and Europa.

"That would be huge for understanding how common life might be throughout the universe."

The $5 billion probe is currently at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, sitting in a "clean room" -- a sealed area only accessible to people wearing head-to-toe covering.

The precautions are to ensure the probe remains free of contaminants to avoid transporting Earthly microbes to Europa.

After transport to Kennedy Space Center in Florida, Clipper is set to launch aboard a Space X Falcon Heavy rocket and begin an over-five-year journey that involves a pass by Mars to pick up speed.

In 2031, it should be in orbit around Jupiter and Europa, where it will begin a detailed study of the moon scientists believe is covered in frozen water.

"We have instruments like cameras, and spectrometers, a magnetometer and a radar that can... penetrate right through ice, bounce off liquid water and back to the surface to tell us how thick is the ice and where is liquid water located," Pappalardo said.

Mission managers do not expect to find little green men swimming in the water -- in fact, they're not even looking for life itself, only for the conditions that could support it.

Scientists know from extreme environments on Earth -- like light-starved geothermal vents located deep under the polar ice cap -- that tiny beings can find purchase almost anywhere.

And conditions on Europa, which is almost as large as Earth's moon, could provide a similar habitat, offering the tantalizing prospect we are not alone -- not even in our own Solar System.

"If moons around planets far away from stars could hold life, then the number of opportunities around the solar system, around the universe, where life could take hold, I think goes up dramatically," said Jordan Evans, project manager for the Europa Clipper mission.

- Challenges -

The science is not easy -- a powerful radiation field around Europa could degrade the instruments, which will be getting the equivalent of 100,000 chest x-rays every circuit around the moon.

The vast distances involved mean that when Clipper sends its data back, the signal will take 45 minutes to arrive at Mission Control.

And despite its massive solar array, which unfurls once in space, keeping Clipper powered will be a major challenge, Evans said.

"Right after launch, (the solar panels are) putting out 23,000 watts... but when we're out at Jupiter, so far away from the Sun, they're only putting out 700 watts," he said.

"Near Earth, they could power 20 houses continuously. And when we're at Jupiter, just a few light bulbs and some small appliances."

The mission, planning for which began in the late 1990s, is expected to conclude around 2034, when Clipper will likely have reached the end of its useful life.

The probe will then have one final port of call: Jupiter's largest moon, deputy project manager Tim Larson said.

"After we're done with the science mission, the way we end is by crashing into one of the other bodies in the Jovian system to dispose of the spacecraft," he said.

"Right now, the plan is to go into Ganymede."

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

At long last, it’s Release Day, ladies and gentlemen.

Possibly.

As everyone in the civilized world knows, Donald Trump fought the law, and the law won (temporarily). So, he had to sign the Epstein Files Transparency Act precisely 30 days ago.

Today, that bill comes due. This means all unclassified docs and investigative materials related to one Jeffrey Epstein must be put out into the world in some form.

Perhaps.

The mainstream media has been fairly breathless all week, preparing us for the looming possibilities. We can practically taste the feloniousness, the smoking-gun evidence, the pointed fingers, the coming grand jury indictments. the empty denials. The champagne is on ice. Pop the corks and grab the flutes, fellow Americans. It’s about to be party time! Merry Christmas!

Or, you know, maybe not.

First off, we know how defiantly lukewarm this administration is when it comes to following the law — any law, especially one Trump himself had a hand in creating.

We’ve come to appreciate its unshakable rejection of truth and transparency. It has this year consistently done everything in its power (and much that isn’t) to remain unencumbered by rules that govern the rest of humanity.

And whenever this lawless gang needs a helping hand, the corrupt majority on the U.S. Supreme Court reliably grants them “temporary” carte blanche to reject any check on their authority “for now.”

Besides that, Trumpistan can still concoct half a million reasons why releasing anything Epstein-ish today would compromise:

  • a) an investigation
  • b) national security
  • c) victims’ identities
  • d) KFC’s secret recipe of eleven herbs and spices
  • e) child-proof packaging.

There is also the little matter of the Trump Administration having had 11 months to block out, erase, wipe clean, obscure, and otherwise make vanish all documentary evidence that ties the president and his wealthy buddies to having indulged in any illegal/immoral activity with Epstein and his imprisoned harem of girls and young women.

By the time Trump’s Department of Justice and FBI were done scrubbing this stuff, it probably barely seemed like Epstein and his one-time best pal ever so much as passed each other on the street in the same town. A sample page might read:

“Mr. Epstein (REDACTED) and Mr. (REDACTED) were seen (REDACTED) in (REDACTED) by (REDACTED) for the purpose of (REDACTED).”

Officially, the DOJ/FBI has been redacting the files “for legal reasons” (translation: to protect the guilty), because even MAGA loyalists seem to have little tolerance for underage sex trafficking and child rape — at least in theory.

But if we’re looking at this with open eyes and firing synapses, the chances that a single thing Trump doesn’t want people to see will be spotted among these approximately 300 gigabytes of data would appear agonizingly slim.

No, none of us want to believe that, just like we didn’t want to fathom that Robert Mueller and his ballyhooed investigation into 2016 Trump campaign collusion with Russia wouldn’t save us. But that didn’t, and this won’t.

It isn’t because there wasn’t/isn’t likely massive evidence of guilt in both cases. Proving it when the perpetrators appear so shamelessly good at manipulating the law to their advantage, or simply ignoring it, is unfortunately another story entirely.

What has been regularly puzzling in the case of Epstein and his merry group of high-profile, well-heeled abusers is why Trump has fought so hard to keep the pressure-washed files from public consumption. If these case files have been so dramatically altered and obscured that they’re no longer even a mild threat, what’s he so damn worried about?

One answer may be that even if Trump isn’t personally endangered by any criminal exposure, the reputational risk remains — not merely for him but for others he’s protecting. Of course, if he can get away with transferring Ghislaine Maxwell to a country club lockup and weighing a potential pardon, the only remaining risk seemingly is in pissing the guy off, not breaking the actual law.

No matter what happens to the Epstein files today or going forward, however, there has already been plenty of political damage done to the Republican cult from this undying scandal.

The President of the United States has been soiled by his clear friendship and close association with perhaps the most notorious known pedophile and child sex trafficker in American history. This is not a minor transgression, even for a man capable of brushing off felonies and immoral conduct like lint on his tie.

While Trump’s culpability may never again land him in a court of law, in the court of public opinion his stock continues to plummet.

It isn’t the revelations learned in the files that are potentially damaging so much as the ongoing month-after-month speculation over them, which is why all the continued ministrations from Trump and Company to keep the crisis alive have been so curiously, breathtakingly stupid.

Too many of his MAGA brethren still like to pretend that a man who has never told the truth in his life, even by accident, is somehow practicing honesty in claiming he did nothing and knew nothing surrounding Epstein. The chances of this are approximately zero, as those who have to this point in their lives avoided brain damage understand.

It also isn’t as if anyone actually believes that Trump, as a proud self-proclaimed pussy-grabber, is above the sort of behavior that’s being so determinedly covered up. Quite the contrary, the shock would be in establishing indisputable proof that he steered clear of an opportunity because it was (gasp) wrong.

The truth is that we can scarcely imagine the president would ever practice decency or travel a road that shunned criminality. This in itself makes whatever these Epstein files contain or doesn’t contain pretty much irrelevant.

And if nothing comes out, or comes of, this ballyhooed would-be release, fret not, all ye fans of the rule of law. Unlike Epstein himself, his legacy is never going away.

  • Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.
THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The Republican Party is turning on Donald Trump once more after the president's national address.

A GOP insider believes there is one issue Trump "can't happy talk his way out of" as political analysts highlight the woeful cost of living crisis. The unnamed insider, speaking to CNN, is said to be advising on several midterm races and the cost of living crisis will likely be a hot topic for voters next year.

They said, "The president can’t happy talk his way out of what people feel. The White House staff around the president know what the message needs to be, and I wish that the president would listen."

Trump has said numerous times the affordability crisis is a "hoax" but GOP insiders are urging the president to reconsider his position on the economy. A Republican Party member who served in the first Trump administration told Politico the "execution was abysmal" for the president's comments in the national address.

They said, "It’s the right idea to talk about the economy more, but the execution was abysmal. He’s a very effective salesman when his heart is in it or when he’s on the attack. But the ‘I feel your pain’ speech — he just doesn’t have that club in his bag."

A Trump adviser has since suggested it will "take some time to turn things around" with the economy, and that the White House are doing their best to keep the president focused.

They said, "They’re trying to keep him focused, and they’re trying to get back on message. It’s going to take some time to turn things around. … But we’ve got to get the advantage back on affordability issues."

Trump was roundly criticised for his national address, with even the MAGA faithful considering the speech a waste of time. Other political commentators from across the political spectrum suggested Trump had lost the magic that made him president.

Ex-GOP strategist Rick Wilson suggested the speech was more of a "deep scream of outright panic" from the president than anything else.

He wrote, "His old, hypnotic MAGA mojo was gone, leaving only a desperate, ranting old man trying for one last time to inspire the old magic. It failed, utterly."

In a video to go along with the Substack piece, Wilson added, "He can't figure out how to pull himself out of the polling slump where he now has an approval rating of 38%, that is a screaming, flaming, white hot stinking disaster. In the space of a 20-minute scream-a-thon, every single one of the greatest hits of 2024, threw it against the wall. Guess what? None of it was convincing. Not a single bit of it was selling."

Donald Trump has found himself compared to a fictional dictator by the press office of California Governor Gavin Newsom.

A viral post to the Governor Newsom Press Office X account had an image of Trump, screenshot from a recent announcement video, contrast with that of President Snow from The Hunger Games series. The comparison was made just hours after Trump announced his plans for a "patriotic" competition that had many compare it to the dystopian fiction series written by Suzanne Collins.

In a video posted by Freedom 250 on Thursday, the president promised "to give America the most spectacular birthday party the world." He said, "In the fall, we will host the first-ever Patriot Games, an unprecedented four-day athletic event featuring the greatest high school athletes, one young man and one young woman from each state and territory."

Members of the public and political representatives were quick to point out the comparison between Trump's "Patriot Games" and the fictional "Hunger Games".

An image posted by the Governor Newsom Press Office had a picture of Trump and President Snow, the latter portrayed by Donald Sutherland, as a side by side comparison. Using a quote from The Office, the image depicted the two presidents and asked viewers to "find the differences between this picture and this picture."

Underneath the first image is a picture of Pam from The Office, who says, "They're the same picture." Governor Newsom also weighed in on the announcement of the Patriot Games, sharing a post from The Hunger Games film adaptation.

Sharing the clip, he added, "May the odds be ever in your favor." It comes after Trump's disaster of a national address, which has been roundly criticised by political pundits.

CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes told viewers on Thursday that the Republican Party may be scrambled by the address.

She said, "Look, they're all watching everything closely, and they've seen how it's been reviewed. I will say one thing. The White House worked together as a team, as they often do the inner circle to craft this speech. And they needed a speech in which President Trump would stay on message, that was short, that addressed the economy."

"Republicans came out of that speech more anxious that the messaging around the economy was not where it should be going into 2026, and that the party as a whole was not really solidified in that messaging about the economy, especially when it came to all of this blame on the previous administration."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}