Pandagon
It Would Be Irresponsible Not To Note This
Voting records show that my grandmother has actually cast more votes in the U.S. Senate this year than John McCain.
Given that John McCain is, by transitive property, my grandparent, he owes me two and a half decades of Christmas and birthday presents. I will also take a lump-sum Paypal payment at my e-mail address. They accept American Express, pops. Love you!
Al Gore Is Up In This Piece
Al Gore just stepped onstage at Netroots Nation, meaning that I am compelled by my contractual liberalism to post on the environment.
The Wall Street Journal surprisingly opines against carbon-based environmental regulations yesterday. I am also surprisingly wearing shorts and sandals in Austin. And Al Gore is also surprisingly handsome and manly.
The thrust of the argument is that the EPA wants to become some Big Brother regulatory agency that would drastically change how our buildings and vehicles are built and operated, regulating much more of the construction and assembly processes in order to ensure a greener and less damaging economy. Am I the only one who doesn't see much of a problem with this?
Our economy is, in many critical ways, failing to innovate. And not the we-made-Crystal-Pepsi failing to innovate, but the we-brought-back-old-Coke-as-Coke-classic failing to innovate. It's affecting every sector of our economy, from automobiles to housing to technology, and our main response to it seems to be to promote tax breaks and incentives that keep said industries from failing rather than encouraging them to succeed and new industries to innovate. If the heavy hand of government needs to come in and shake things up and get us out of this stupor, then so be it - but the fundamental problem with competitiveness in our economy today is that government isn't doing enough of the right things to shape and focus our economic direction, which has the perverse effect of overloading and even crippling the "free market" with the mandate of government non-intervention.
The Iraqi Prime Minister May Have Been Born A Muslim
The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri Al-Maliki, endorses Barack Obama's withdrawal plan for Iraq.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki told a German magazine he supported prospective U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's proposal that U.S. troops should leave Iraq within 16 months.
In an interview with Der Spiegel released on Saturday, Maliki said he wanted U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq as soon as possible.
"U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes."
Of course, one of the big flaws in the Republican fetishization of "the facts on the ground" (read: the cobbled-together occurrences and out-of-context events that make up the continued rationale to keep fighting onwards towards Victory 18 of 26 in the war) is that, quite often, the facts on the ground reflect an Iraqi political and military landscape that, to an extent, mirrors ours. There are always going to be downsides to any plan in Iraq, if for no other reason than that the continued building on a flawed foundation simply guarantees a flawed building. What we have to take from this is that it's generally smarter to stop building than it is to continually (and expensively) compensate for the thousands of mistakes that were made during the process.
Family Research Council in desperate need of design skilz
This is what happens when fundies avoid the creative class because of teh gay, and are left with graphic designers without any sense of style. In the Family Reseach Council's latest e-blast, look at the icon designed to represent "traditional marriage" - a genitals-free, shapeless Play-doh figure. I think that says a lot about what they believe marriage is all about.
Homosexual Activists Fight Free Speech
The California marriage amendment cleared its final hurdle yesterday when the same court that imposed same-sex "marriage" on the state agreed to let voters decide whether or not to overturn its ruling. In one swift, unanimous motion, the California Supreme Court refused even to hear the lawsuit brought by homosexual groups which claimed Proposition 8 was "legally flawed." Meanwhile, thousands of same-sex couples are scurrying to "marry" before voters determine the fate of those unions this fall. Local business owners-turned family advocates are doing all they can to ensure the honeymoon with counterfeit marriage is short-lived-and homosexual activists are attacking their right to speak out. Doug Manchester, a devout Catholic who donated to the ballot initiative, is the new target of Californians Against Hate. In a fundraising letter, Hate head Fred Karger called for a boycott of Manchester's Grand Hyatt and Grand Del Mar hotels. Robert Hoehn's gift to preserve marriage not only landed his Carlsbad car dealership on the boycott list but drew protests at his lots. We applaud these men for refusing to be intimidated and encourage Californians not to back down in the face of those who refuse to accept democratic rule.
Pathetic
No it's not. Ever since I heard that they're having this right wing convention in town as a sort of shadow "fuck you for being better than us" convention, I've been telling everyone I meet at Netroots Nation. Not one has heard of this. Not one.
The rest of the story highlights how pathetic this is, size and influence-wise, but the lede is seriously misleading.
Obama: Gay Chick Lover
It needs to be said: this Obama fellow is sort of cool.
Barack Obama is a dedicated feminist who "lives surrounded by women," his half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, told a mostly female crowd at a Women For Obama event in downtown Tampa on Thursday.
Soetoro-Ng told the crowd that Obama helped rear her and now is rearing two daughters. "Those girls are what make him a feminist," she said.
[...]
She said he taught her to ride a bicycle, made her practice harder math problems and start an exercise program, took her on college visits and even gave her her first women's health book - "Our Bodies, Ourselves," a 1973 guide that came out of the women's movement and focused on female sexuality, health and hygiene.
Personally, I think this makes him a great guy, and because the binary nature of the universe requires all sensible things to be immediately answered by gibbering loons, I give you Redstate. Suffice to say, Obama's embrace of the fact that his sister is actually a woman is an unacceptable affront to all that is masculine, because the one thing dudes shouldn't be capable of is identifying women. Knowing about vaginas is totally gay.
One thing I always wonder about when I read conservatives defining masculinity - if one of the central and defining points of being a man is simultaneously wanting to fuck women like hurricanes and not knowing anything about fucking women like hurricanes, how do I achieve my ultimate goal of hurricane-like woman fucking? I will ask this question, and many more, at Right Online tomorrow.
Watch the now-infamous panel
Dubbed the "infamous" fucks panel by Gavin. Watch Kevin Drum say dirty words! Watch Jesse tell an infamous joke. Watch Atrios be smart and shit. Watch the Rude Pundit explain his limits. Watch Digby defend cursing. Watch Amanda drink a lot of water.
Without comment
"I am ready to sign a deal [with Blackwater] in exchange for an admission of the crime and an apology," Mohammed Hafidh Abdul-Razzaq, a car spare-parts dealer from Baghdad, told the BBC.
"This is important for me, morally, for my family and my tribe."
He said he had conveyed the message to one of the company's officials when they met in the Iraqi capital; but, he said, he was told that an admission would not be possible "for legal reasons".
More Netroots Nation thoughts
After watching the panel with Digby, Atrios, Paul Krugman, and Rick Perlstein, I can say I see a theme shaping up this year's Netroots Nation. The assumption hanging over all panels and other get-togethers is that Obama is going to win in November and we'll be facing what's basically a new era of liberal blogging, where the Democrats aren't on the outside and we don't have Bush-creating-a-dictatorship to protest. Are bloggers going to hold his feet to the fire or are we going to wither and die without an administration to hate? I think the past year has shown, with the marked decline in blogging about Bush Suckors because of his lame duck status, that bloggers don't run out of opinions because the story is changing. In fact, as the country theoretically moves in a more liberal direction, it'll be exciting be the on-the-ground chroniclers of the change.
As usual, I'm skittish about the complacency with the idea that Obama is going to win so easily. I mean, it seems that Obama is going to pull way ahead, and especially after he wipes the floor with McCain in the debates. But it's also clear that the media has chosen their favored candidate and that might be an insurmountable obstacle. And the disproportionate power that underpopulated and rural states have will be a massive factor in this election, as it usually is, but maybe even more so because of the way racism is coming into play this election. I'm just not feeling easy about all this. If you're planning the dream wedding before you get the ring, you're setting yourself up for being massively disappointed.
Further thoughts on Harold Ford
(Moulitsas & Ford begins about 26 minutes in)
In no particular order:
1. "Just be glad you live in a country where you can gather together for a political movement without being arrested" is the last refuge of the obfuscator. Especially when the issue you're responding to (telecom immunity) has direct bearing on whether this country remains one where you can gather together for a political movement.
2. He did have a point, however: Several of the candidates (if not the majority; it was hard to tell) the Netroots hand-selected for Congressional races in 2006, and beyond, voted for the FISA compromise; DLC congresspeople and other centrists are certainly not solely to blame.
3. However: No, Harold, I don't believe that if the Justice Department asks me to do something, I'm automatically justified in doing it. I understand the pressures that are on businesspeople if they fear political reprisal, but these are national conglomerates we're talking about. This isn't Cliff Johnson from Ames worried about how his family will eat if his corner drugstore closes. The telecoms made a cynical choice to be complicit in clear breaches of the law and privacy, and should have been held responsible.
Update: Blogging while listening to panels contributes to forgetfulness; let me add that in Ford's example, he talked about a business owner consulting with an outside law firm to (paraphrasing) "see if we can do this." This is a faulty assumption. The question for the law firms should have been "can we refuse?"
Harold Ford Explains It All
Watching the Markos/Harold Ford panel right now.
I can only dream of one day sitting in a chair like Harold Ford does. This man owns casual seating.
I always find that the truest measure of a politician's skill is how they handle a potentially hostile crowd. Harold Ford does it by saying "with all due respect" a bunch.
Bush, OSHA, and chopped body parts at poultry plants
A news segment from Bill Moyers' Journal on PBS this past week exposed how poultry workers in the Carolinas are losing their body parts. And, how Bush's administration had a hand in it.The segment was based on what reporters from the Charlotte Observer found after launching a year-long investigation into the safety records at one of the top ten poultry corporations in the nation: House of Raeford Farms. In a 6-part news series called, "The Cruelest Cut," reporters exposed how House of Raeford Farms had failed to keep records of worker injuries to avoid OSHA inspections and fines. Injuries such as loss of fingers, hands, arms, other serious injuries workers suffered, even deaths.
...The workers, most of them immigrants, had been afraid of talking to anyone about what was happening because they feared deportation. These workers were also suffering from serious muscular injuries such as carpel tunnel, tendinitis, etc. The average poultry worker does about 20,000 cuts of chicken a day! The repetitive movements have left many of them disabled and unable to work with their hands again.
It's shameful, and this goes on with the Bush Administration's facilitation. You can read the entire Charlotte Observer expose here, and you can see video from the Moyers' report and the transcript here. A snippet of a portion on the Bush Administration's role in allowing falsification of injury reports by business is below the fold. And remember, McSame wants to continue more of the same -- coddling the businesses that engage in this kind of worker exploitation because it's all about the free market. Besides, most of the people working in these plants getting limbs cut off are brown people who can't vote, so what me worry?
NARRATOR: The logs the reporters were examining are known as 300 logs. They're required by OSHA and are intended to serve as an accounting of serious jobsite injuries and illnesses. Osha uses 300 logs to help determine how safe plants are, and whether or not they need inspection.The reporters would use them to help determine whether or not the companies were under-reporting injuries.
But it was something the logs didn't contain that would help them answer a broader question: why did official statistics make the poultry industry seem so much safer than experts believed it could possibly be?
AMES ALEXANDER: There used to be a column on injury logs where companies were supposed to record all repetitive motion injuries. Uh, and this essentially gave OSHA inspectors a very quick idea of how common repetitive motion problems like carpal tunnel, like tendonitis, were. Uh, and then, uh, under pressure, uh, from the industry, OSHA removed that column.
NARRATOR: It was OSHA under the Bush administration that removed the column in 2002. The result, according to Ames Alexander?
AMES ALEXANDER: OSHA essentially made it easier for companies to hide these sort of repetitive motion injuries. One plant we looked at, uh, in 2001, it had 150 repetitive motion injuries. After they removed the column, they had fewer than 10.
NARRATOR: The Bush administration also repealed a collection of rules put in place at the end of the Clinton administration. The rules, which formed a national ergonomics standard, would have required employers to correct workplace conditions likely to cause repetitive-motion and other injuries.
Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.