Neo-Nazi Marine Corps vet gets break over alleged possession of classified documents

Neo-Nazi Marine Corps vet gets break over alleged possession of classified documents
LinkedIn photo of Jordan Duncan, a Marine Corps veteran whom the government alleges had classified military materials on his hard drive

WILMINGTON, N.C. — Federal prosecutors today agreed to not bring up classified materials found in possession of a Marine Corps veteran and neo-Nazi when he goes on trial on charges related to an alleged plot to attack the power grid to provide cover for an assassination campaign.

Raw Story exclusively reported that federal prosecutors notified the court that they found documents that appeared to be classified materials on devices seized from Jordan Duncan, the ex-Marine, following his arrest. In February 2021, the government notified the court that authorities were reviewing Duncan’s electronic devices for evidence of potential violations of federal law that criminalize mishandling government records and sensitive national defense information.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Barbara Kocher told Judge Richard E. Myers II during a Classified Information Procedures Act hearing on Friday that the government will refrain from making references to the materials during the upcoming trial of Duncan.

RELATED ARTICLE: Neo-Nazi Marine Corps vet accused of plotting terror attack possessed classified military materials: sources

Duncan is charged along with co-defendant Liam Collins with conspiracy to illegally manufacture and transport firearms and conspiracy to damage an energy facility. The two men could face up to 25 years in federal prison if convicted.

Duncan was arrested outside of his workplace at a U.S. Navy contractor in Boise, Idaho, in October 2020 as part of an FBI takedown of five young, white men with military ties who the government alleges relocated to Idaho to carry out a terror campaign to instigate a race war.

Kocher told the court on Friday that following Duncan’s arrest, authorities found classified materials on two hard drives seized from Duncan’s apartment in Boise, as well as an additional document that was classified. A previous court filing by Duncan’s lawyer had only referenced the materials as being found on a single hard drive.

Raymond C. Tarlton, Duncan’s lawyer, told Raw Story after the hearing that he does not expect the government to bring separate charges against his client related to the materials. But Don Connelly, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina, later clarified to Raw Story that the only agreement that the government made in court on Friday “was that classified documents won’t be referred to during the trial.”

Duncan, who has been detained since his 2020 arrest, was led into the courtroom in handcuffs and shackles while wearing a tan New Hanover County jail jumpsuit and round glasses. A tattoo of a coiled snake was visible on his forearm.

ALSO READ: How the government's social media screening fails to flag extremists from within

In a protective order issued last week, Myers designated the classified documents as “particularly sensitive discovery materials,” prohibiting Duncan’s counsel from disseminating them to the media, and placing strict controls on showing them to potential witnesses. The protective order indicated that those documents labeled “FOUO,” or “For Official Use Only,” would receive the “particularly sensitive discovery materials” designation.

“This stuff came from the internet, not from his military service or through security clearances issued to him through his employment with a defense contractor,” Tarlton told the court.

Myers conferred in his chambers with Kocher and another federal prosecutor for closed-door hearing so that the prosecutors could describe the contents of the classified materials. Afterwards, Judge Myers reported in open court that he received a proffer from the government that the materials were not relevant to the trial, and they have no intention of discussing acquisition of the materials in front of a jury.

Concerns about sensitive national security materials falling into the hands of domestic extremists were highlighted earlier this year with revelations that Massachusetts National Guard airman Jack Teixeira [sp] shared classified documents about the war in Ukraine on a Discord server.

Meanwhile, during Duncan’s detention hearing in late 2020, a Naval Criminal Investigative Services investigator testified that Duncan amassed a library of documents with information about explosives, car bombs and chemical weapons. Kocher noted to the court shortly after the classified materials were discovered that “the defendants engaged in substantial sharing of other information.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Rep. Max Miller was facing public backlash on Tuesday after a heated interview with CNN anchor Jake Tapper.

Tapper pressed Miller, who has been facing allegations of abusing his ex-wife and 2-year-old daughter, to respond to serious questions about the accusations as calls for him to resign were mounting.

Political and media experts weighed in on Miller's reactions during the conversation.

"Wildly desperate defense from Miller to tie his own allegations to Trump’s and claim staying in the race despite them is 'a quality the American people cherish,'" Vanity Fair Washington correspondent Aidan McLaughlin wrote on X.

"Absolutely crazy interview. Check it out," writer Parker Molloy posted on Bluesky.

"Honestly can't stress enough, as a former family law attorney, how depressingly common Max Miller's behavior and words are, right down to the petty fixation on custody procedure and rules when faced with allegations of shocking violence," Lisa Needham, contributor at Daily Kos, wrote on Bluesky.

"Rep. Max Miller's interview with Jake Tapper was one of the most self-destructive things I've ever witnessed on cable news," journalist Aaron Rupar wrote on Bluesky.

"Rep. Max Miller floundering to keep his assertions straight while defending himself to Jake Tapper," Rolling Stone politics reporter Nikki McCann Ramírez wrote on Bluesky.

Rep. Max Miller floundering to keep his assertions straight while defending himself to Jake Tapper

[image or embed]
— Nikki McCann Ramírez (@nikkimcr.bsky.social) August 4, 2026 at 2:15 PM


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) has changed his mind on the Senate filibuster — once again.

Earlier this year, the longtime senator broke from his past commitment to protecting the controvrsial Senate rule, saying he would support changing the filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act, President Donald Trump's package of voting restrictions. He did this hoping to assuage angry MAGA followers who were flocking to his rival, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, and perhaps get Trump's endorsement — neither of which happened.

Now, with Cornyn denied re-nomination and on his way out of Congress, he told the conservative National Review he once again opposes alteration to the filibuster rules.

“I said I was open to changes in the filibuster, but I was intentionally not very specific,” said Cornyn. “I’m happy to have that conversation, but I’m not prepared to vote to overturn the filibuster at this time.”

Trump, for his part, has repeatedly demanded that Republicans scrap the filibuster to make passing his agenda easier.

A critical mass of Republicans have stood firm against this, because historically, the filibuster obstructs far more pieces of the Democratic Party's agenda than the Republican Party's.

Paxton defeated Cornyn in large part by pressing him on the SAVE America Act, and even went so far as to say he would drop out of the race if the legislation passed before the primary happened — a subtle way of pinning the blame for its failure on Cornyn, who was already serving in the Senate.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's chance of securing his role permanently is hanging on by a thread after a GOP senator came out against him.

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance Blanche's nomination as Attorney General to the full Senate, but not before deals with two GOP senators had to be cut to secure the vote. Now, Blanche has to secure enough Senate votes to secure the AG role, but Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) announced she would not be voting in his favor, according to reports.

"While I believe Mr. Blanche is a capable lawyer, the Department of Justice has become increasingly political," Collins said in a statement. "Mr. Blanche has taken several actions that have further eroded the Department's independence, and that is the basis for my vote to oppose his confirmation."

Blanche can only afford to lose two votes in the Senate if he wants to become President Donald Trump's AG, according to reporting by CNN and Axios, which noted that Sen. Mitch McConnell's lingering absence is also narrowing his margin for error.

During the past few months, Blanche had to battle to secure the support of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) over the weekend said that he won't confirm Blanche after Trump posted on Truth Social that he'll resurrect the $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund, which critics worry will pay Trump allies and Jan. 6ers. Tillis called it a "payout for punks."

However, Tillis ended up voting to advance Blanche. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) also made it unclear whether he would vote for Blanche, and after the vote on Blanche was delayed last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said he would work to shore up the votes to advance Blanche. Ultimately, Cornyn and Tillis voted to advance Blanche.

Now, Blanche can only afford to lose one more vote. Axios noted that Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) haven't said how they will vote on Blanche's confirmation, though Murkowski's state has seen a recent windfall in settlements with Blanche's Department of Justice.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}