Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "jonathan turley"

Trump's favorite law professor comes out swinging against his 'terrible' reporter ban

President Donald Trump's latest attack on press freedom came wth a sharp rebuke — from one of his favorite law professors.

On Friday, Trump announced he would be banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House completely, with the possibility of more outlets to follow. All three outlets have done extensive reporting on the administration, including some stories that have embarrassed the president and his inner circle.

But George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley took to X to condemn the order, warning it will invite legal problems for the administration.

"Trump just reaffirmed his intention to ban CNN, Politico, and MS NOW from the White House," wrote Turley, a regular Fox News commentator who has been sympathetic to Trump on a number of other issues. "Such a move would be an assault on long-honored principles of a free press. I have often joined in the criticism over the bias of these outlets, but barring disfavored media from the White House is a terrible precedent and practice."

"Such a move would raise serious constitutional questions and undermine the country's long-standing position as a voice for the free press. It is hard for the United States to advocate for press rights globally when it is banning disfavored outlets," wrote Turley. "The President just said that he does not believe that courts should not allow media to publish fake news. A court injunction on such reporting would constitute either prior restraint or censorship or both. It would be viewed as a fundamental violation of the First Amendment."

Trump has frequently attacked all three outlets in the past, baselessly accusing them of pushing fake news.

'Baseless': 'Border czar's' prosecution threat at AOC too much even for MAGA attorney

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) received a surprising defense from a Trump-supporting attorney after "border czar" Tom Homan threatened to investigate her for allegedly impeding law enforcement.

Homan repeated Sunday that he asked the Department of Justice to look into Ocasio-Cortez's recent live webinar called "Know Your Rights With ICE," where migrants were advised on what to do if confronted by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

"I asked the Department of Justice, where is that line on impediment, right? It's a broad statute," Homan told CNN's Dana Bash. "Because you can call it 'Know Your Rights' all you want. We all know what the bottom line is. The bottom line is, how do they evade law enforcement?"

ALSO READ: 'Gotta be kidding': Jim Jordan scrambles as he's confronted over Musk 'double standard'

Attorney Jonathan Turley posted to social media Monday, "Border Czar Tom Homan doubled down last night that Rep.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) might be prosecuted for hosting a forum on ‘Know Your Rights’ for accused illegal aliens. Such a prosecution would be an assault on free speech rights."

But Turley couldn't help but take a swipe at the ultra-liberal AOC in a second post, accusing her of being no friend to the First Amendment.

"While AOC has never been a defender of free speech, principle demands something more from the rest of us who value the First Amendment. Just as VP Vance offered a powerful defense of free speech in Europe, this baseless threat undermines the high ground achieved in Munich," Turley wrote.

The "high ground" Turley referred to was a stunning speech given by Vice President J.D. Vance at the Munich Security Council. He slammed Germany over censorship and encouraged the government to listen to the country's far-right political parties. Vance was criticized at home and abroad, with Rep. Laura Gillen (D-NY) slamming Vance as "embracing a group that flirts with Nazism."

In response to Homan's repeated threats, Ocasio-Cortez posted, "Maybe he can learn to read. The Constitution would be a good place to start."


'A possible problem': Trump's favorite law professor shoots a hole in his TikTok proposal

Jonathan Turley, a law professor and Fox News contributor who regularly champions all things Donald Trump wasn't so sure about the president-elect's call for businesses to trust "that there will be no liability" if they thwart the TikTok ban.

Shortly after TikTok pulled the plug on its U.S. operations because it hadn't found a buyer to replace its Chinese-run parent company, Trump asked U.S. providers to defy the ban.

Trump posted to TruthSocial Sunday, "I’m asking companies not to let TikTok stay dark! I will issue an executive order on Monday to extend the period of time before the law’s prohibitions take effect, so that we can make a deal to protect our national security. The order will also confirm that there will be no liability for any company that helped keep TikTok from going dark before my order."

Turley gave his legal take in a series of posts on X:

"President Trump's statements indicate that he may issue a 90-day extension for TikTok after he is sworn in on January 20th. However, there is a possible problem with such a plan given the language of the Act...

"...The Act refers to a 270-day period from the date of enactment for a foreign adversary controlled application. If period ends on Jan. 19th, it is not clear that the 90-day extension is an option...

"...Moreover, even with a 90-day period, that is not a lot of runway for a corporate sale or a legislative fix. Any way this goes, the status of the company will exist in a weird Zombie statutory state of being among the living dead."

ALSO READ: Inside the parade of right-wing world leaders flocking to D.C. for Trump's inauguration

Trump ally House Speaker Mike Johnson appeared on NBC's Meet The Press Sunday where he declared, "We will enforce the law" on the ban passed by Congress in the interest of national security. Two MAGA senators also broke from Trump on the issue, Tom Cotton (R-AK) and Pete Ricketts (R-NE). In a statement, they praised U.S. companies that played by the rules.

“We commend Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft for following the law and halting operations with ByteDance and TikTok, and we encourage other companies to do the same. The law, after all, risks ruinous bankruptcy for any company who violates it," they wrote.

Trump has not responded so far to the legal concerns over his "no liability" promise.

Meanwhile, TikTok was back up in the U.S. Sunday, with the company posting a "thank you" to the president-elect:

"In agreement with our service providers, TikTok is in the process of restoring service. We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive. It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States."

8 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Only vague signs point to the possibility of piercing Donald Trump’s orange armor and political impunity.

Trump dispatched Nikki Haley, his last serious challenger for the Republican presidential nomination, in early March. But Haley fared better than expected in May’s Indiana primary, where she was still on the ballot if not in the race, possibly indicating softness in Trump’s support.

If Trump is convicted on any of the 88 felony charges he faces in four court cases, it could cost him his freedom — and support. An ABC/Ipsos poll said one-fifth of Trump voters would either reconsider or withdraw their support if he’s convicted of a felony.

It also remains to be seen how voters will react to court testimony revealing salacious details of Trump’s private life, including the alleged liaison with former porn actress Stormy Daniels.

ALSO READ: Trump told to pay up before rallying in N.J. town he previously stiffed

“He is a tank. He is a boulder. I don't think there is literally anything that can happen to this man that would make him lose because he has such a chokehold on the Republican Party,” said Amani Wells-Onyioha, operations director at Democratic political firm Sole Strategies.

The boulder became larger in March. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that states — such as Colorado, which tried — could not use the 14th Amendment to keep Trump off the ballot.

But there are ways that Trump could be denied the presidency aside from losing the election to Joe Biden in November.

As the justice system plods onward, rewarding Trump’s delay tactics in three of his four felony cases, the former president’s hush money trial in New York might be the only time he sits in court as a defendant before November’s election.

That case, however, does have the potential to put Trump in jail.

“There's a very real possibility that he gets convicted of one of these and is looking at prison time,” said Nicholas Creel, assistant professor of business law at Georgia College and State University. “When we get to the hypothetical point of him needing to take office, we've got to figure out now, is he actually above the law. The Supreme Court will have to step in.

“There is a very, very real possibility that a Supreme Court majority — probably a five-four ruling — could say you still have to face the music, Mr. President, and if we enter political paralysis, that's because we have chosen that you would be the president in prison,” Creel continued.

Here are eight scenarios — from the plausible to the unlikely — where Trump does not return to the presidency no matter the result of the 2024 presidential election:

Trump falls gravely ill or dies of natural causes

When Americans discuss age and the presidency, it’s usually about Biden, the nation’s first octogenarian commander-in-chief who will be 82 years old on Inauguration Day 2025.

But Trump, 77, is not a young man, either.

Trump turns 78 on June 14. If elected president this year, Trump would become the oldest president in history at the time he took office, surpassing Biden.

The average age of death for a man who’s served as president of the United States is about 72 years old, according to Statista, and only 12 out of the 45 U.S. presidents have lived to celebrate their 80th birthday.

So while the topic itself is grim, even uncouth, the odds of Trump falling gravely ill or dying before Election Day 2024 are not insignificant.

ALSO READ: 'Most transparent president' Trump won't meet financial transparency deadline. Again.

What would happen next upon either scenario would largely be a function of the point in time Trump stopped running.

Elaine Kamarck of the Brookings Institution, author of “Primary Politics: Everything you need to know about how America nominates its presidential candidates, notes that state election officials are allowed to adjust filing deadlines for new candidates if the frontrunner dies or is incapacitated. For some of the states that haven’t yet conducted their nominating contests, they could also move back their primaries.

If Trump couldn’t continue after becoming the presumptive 2024 presidential nominee, the nation would almost certainly gird for a brokered Republican National Convention, which is scheduled for mid-July in Milwaukee, Wis.

And if Trump officially secured the GOP nomination, but couldn’t stand for election in November 2024, a select group of Republican Party bigwigs would likely convene to choose a replacement — whether that was Trump’s yet-to-be-named vice presidential running mate, or someone else.

Trump is removed via the 25th Amendment

The Constitution’s 25th Amendment spells out the succession plan if a president dies or is removed from office, which means the vice president takes over.

If the vice president and his cabinet determine that the president is unable to discharge his duties as president — say, being in prison — Congress will have 48 hours to convene and 21 days to decide if the president is fit to hold office. It can remove him by a two-thirds vote.

“You can even see his cabinet exercising the 25th Amendment, saying, look, you're incapacitated. You're not capable because you're needing to go to prison or are in prison. You're not capable of fulfilling the oath of office, therefore, we're invoking [the] 25th Amendment and removing you from office that way, and so you would see whoever his vice president elect is [at] that point stepping up,” Creel said.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, the Supreme Court will ultimately need to decide if a sitting president is immune from state-level prosecution in Georgia, and the Court might rule against his ability to serve as president. The other two pending cases are in federal court.

“Functionally this would mean Trump is the legitimate president but would still be forced to carry out a sentence in a state prison,” Creel said. “In that scenario, it’s difficult to see how he wouldn’t be either impeached and convicted or otherwise removed via the 25th Amendment due to his ‘incapacity.’”

But with a third of the Supreme Court being Trump appointees, Svante Myrick, president of People For the American Way and former mayor of Ithaca, N.Y., said he could see the Court ruling in Trump’s favor and allowing him to serve any legal consequences at a later time.

“Uncharted legal territory with stakes this high means questions like that usually get kicked up to the Supreme Court. Given that Donald Trump appointed three members of the Supreme Court on a six-person ultra-conservative majority, I think the most likely scenario is that he's allowed to stand for office, and if he wins, he could avoid or at least delay paying his debt to society,” Myrick said.

The 25th Amendment could also be used for a president’s mental competence.

While Trump attacks Biden for being “cognitively impaired,” Trump isn’t always sharp himself. He has fallen asleep often during the New York trial, according to observers in the courtroom, and has frequently slurred words or botched facts on the campaign trail. Trump said last year Biden would lead the U.S. into “World War II” and, in the same speech, said he was leading former President Barack Obama in polls for the 2024 election.

Trump loses the GOP nomination in a floor fight

Republicans are saying there’s effectively no chance of this, according to NBC News.

Morton Blackwell, a member of the Republican National Committee’s convention rules committee since 1988, said convention rules can be changed but it won’t happen — “absent a cement truck coming around the corner and killing the nominee.”

Trump flees the country

As George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley wrote, Trump “is one of the most recognized figures in the world. He would have to go to Mars to live incognito. It is facially absurd.”

As outlandish as it may sound, Trump could theoretically find refuge from legal threats in a country that’s not so friendly to the United States — but potentially friendly to Trump.

Think Russia. Saudi Arabia. Even — dare one say it — North Korea. Unlike most people in legal peril, Trump has massive amounts of money and the physical means — specifically, his own “Trump Force One” Boeing 757 — to get to a place beyond the reach of special counsel Jack Smith, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis or the U.S. justice system, writ large.

Trump ally Tucker Carlson, it’s worth noting, was welcomed by Russia to interview President Vladimir Putin at a time when the Russian government has for months detained two American journalists — the Wall Street Journal’s Evan Gershkovich and Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty editor Alsu Kurmasheva. News organizations and press freedom advocates have roundly condemned the detentions as unjust, with the Wall Street Journal saying that Russia has arbitrarily and wrongfully detained” Gershkovich “for doing his job as a journalist.”

And in addition to the Russias and Chinas of the world, there are dozens of other nations that don’t have extradition treaties with the United States, which makes it extremely difficult for the U.S. law enforcement officials to spirit a wanted man into custody and back to American soil.

Of course, such a drastic move by Trump would all but guarantee that he could never again return to the United States as a free man.

But Trump has well-established business ties in numerous foreign countries and could ostensibly live like a fugitive king in a welcoming nation.

And in October 2020, days before the election he wouldn’t win, Trump himself floated the idea of becoming an ex-pat: “Could you imagine if I lose? I’m not going to feel so good. Maybe I’ll have to leave the country, I don’t know.”

Said Wells-Onyioha: “If he doesn't want to face charges, I can see him attempting to flee. Trump genuinely feels like the rules don't apply to him, so I think that there's nothing that he won't do. I don't think he wants to face any accountability or any repercussions for any of the things that he's done thus far, so I can see him trying to flee.”

In actuality, it’s much more likely that Trump’s legal team will continue bids to delay the court proceedings as long as possible.

“(Trump) can tie the legal system up for a long time, so that’s what I suspect he'll end up doing,” said John Geer, dean of the college of arts and science and professor of political science and public policy and education at Vanderbilt University.

A judge fined Trump $454 million, including interest, earlier this year after finding he committed fraud involving his business interests in New York. He is appealing the decision.

ALSO READ: Wisconsin GOP details aftermath of $2.3 million theft

Last month, Trump lost an appeal for a new trial after being hit with an $83.3 million verdict by a jury. The jury found Trump liable for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll — for a second time — about what a previous jury determined was sexual assault.

A trial date has not been set on federal election subversion charges against Trump. The judge is waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on Trump’s claim of absolute immunity for official acts while he was president. A federal appeals court unanimously found no such privilege.

There is also no start date for Trump’s federal trial on charges of illegally retaining classified documents after he left the White House. Critics of Judge Aileen Cannon say she is moving much too slowly on procedural issues that could have been settled faster. That leaves only a slim chance of a trial starting before the election.

A Georgia election interference case against Trump is delayed as he appeals a court decision allowing prosecutor Fani Willis to remain on the case. Trump’s lawyers argue that her romantic relationship with the prosecutor she hired to take the lead in prosecuting Trump was misconduct.

Trump dies from assassination

Even more grim is the specter of assassination, an ever-present specter for presidents and presidential candidates alike.

Four presidents — John F. Kennedy, William McKinley, James Garfield and Abraham Lincoln — died after being shot.

Ronald Reagan, in 1981, could have been the fifth assassinated president but for the quick reactions of law enforcement and medical personnel. Last August, while attempting to serve a warrant, FBI agents shot and killed a Utah man who had allegedly made “credible” threats against Biden.

High-profile presidential candidates also come under threat.

The most notable modern example is that of Robert F. Kennedy, who died in 1968 after being shot at a campaign event. (Kennedy’s son, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is now running for president as an independent, and he has publicly stated that he believes his father’s convicted killer isn’t the man who committed the crime.)

Theodore Roosevelt, then a former president attempting a comeback, survived being shot in the chest during a campaign event in 1912.

Trump, like every past president and many presidential candidates, receives U.S. Secret Service protection and will ostensibly be entitled to such protection even if he’s convicted of a crime and sent to prison or home detention.

There are several known plots — all foiled — that involved attempts to assassinate or otherwise harm Trump.

Trump agrees to quit the race before Election Day

This seems unlikely considering how far Trump has come and his standing with voters less than six months before the election.

Avoiding jail or prison time, however, could affect Trump’s thinking. Some observers don’t believe his comments about being ready to go to jail.

With Trump facing state charges in Georgia and New York, he wouldn’t be able to escape by pardoning himself as president — something he could attempt to do for the federal-level charges he faces. Therefore, Trump’s calculus may change.

Creel noted Spiro Agnew’s resignation from the vice presidency in 1973 after facing the threat of jail for his corruption while governor of Maryland.

“One of the parts of the agreement was [to] resign, get out of politics forever, and we will not pursue this,” he said. “So with a more rational defendant, that would absolutely be something that's on the table. That's something Jack Smith would be bringing to Trump, but for one, we're not dealing with a particularly rational individual. Two, this scenario is significantly different in that we have state-level charges also facing him. And so because they can't really immunize him against that at the state level, the incentive to take that sort of a deal is greatly diminished.”

Wells-Onyioha said Trump maybe – maybe – would come to the realization that prison, and the potential life-long loss of his freedom, is a real and unpalatable possibility.

“I can see them coming up with some sort of like plea agreement, where in exchange for dropping out of the race, they will let him be on probation or something like that,” she said. “I can see that happening. But even so, I'm not even sure if he would take that deal.”

Trump is impeached for a third time, then convicted and disqualified from serving as president

If the Supreme Court does say “nobody's above the law, and that includes the president” and lets the criminal justice system do its work, Creel said, Trump could still be disqualified from the presidency via the political system.

“We have a blueprint for how to do that. Impeachment. Conviction. Removal. That's how you could do it, and so you can see him taking office and having that avenue, where he's president for a day and then they just kind of have this perfunctory removal,” Creel said.

Trump was twice impeached while in office, but was acquitted on all counts by the Senate in both cases.

Congress could technically impeach Trump now with the goal of simply disqualifying him from running for elected office. Recall that Trump’s second impeachment trial took place several weeks after he left the White House and was no longer president.

But with Republicans currently controlling the House, where any impeachment proceeding would begin, such a scenario is exceedingly remote.

Trump accepts pardon promise with the understanding that he’ll quit the race

An exotic and unlikely scenario is Biden pardoning Trump with the understanding that Trump will quit the presidential race.

Biden, who has recently stepped up his criticism of Trump, has never spoken of such an idea.

A most imperfect historical parallel would be President Gerald Ford’s pardoning of President Richard Nixon after Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal.

But there’s no evidence Ford’s pardon involved either an overt or secret quid pro quo, according to the National Constitution Center, and came only after Nixon had officially stepped down.

Also: Could Trump serve as president while set to serve time?

In short: yes.

There’s precedent that presidents don’t have full legal immunity — look at the 1997 Supreme Court ruling in Clinton v. Jones, Creel says — but Trump could be still allowed to serve any prison time post-presidency if convicted and sentenced for any of the 88 charges.

That would require the Supreme Court ruling that Trump couldn’t have his presidential duties interfered with by state level charges.

“We have to just set them aside to the point where he could realistically, in that scenario if that's what the Supreme Court says, be told January 20, at 12:01 p.m., 2028, report for incarceration in the state of Georgia,” Creel said. “That's an actual realistic possibility that could go his way.”

NOW READ: How Trump could run for president from jail

'Yikes': Experts school Trump's favorite law professor for attack on Biden's ancestor

George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, a frequent defender of Donald Trump who also advocated for the ex-president as a witness during his first impeachment, just received a lesson of his own after attacking President Joe Biden's great-great grandfather.

Turley, a Fox News legal pundit who predicted Trump would lose his claim that he can't be prosecuted for election crimes because of "presidential immunity," wrote a new article in which he outlines "a recent discovery of the criminal history of the great-great-grandfather" of Biden.

"It turns out that the evasion of accountability may be something of a family trait acquired through generations of natural selection," Turley wrote in promoting the column on social media.

ALSO READ: Prison president: How Donald Trump could serve from behind bars

Turley was swiftly hit with a community note from the social media network, saying, "There is no evidence of an increased genetic predilection for illegal behaviour. This is a field much-studied, and directly contradicts the assertion Turley attempts to argue."

The experts also joined in.

"This should be mortally embarrassing," former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance said Sunday. "Even for Turley."

Former Republican strategist Stuart Stevens also had a take on Turley's column.

"It cost $91,000 a year to attend [George Washington University Law] to be taught by someone who actually wrote a piece about natural selection," Stevens said on Sunday. "I will grant [Turley] the benefit of the doubt that he is about to be charged with some heinous crime and is preparing an insanity defense, but otherwise, this is the stuff of Trump University Law School. Alina Habba would be embarrassed."

Democratic voting rights attorney Marc Elias said, "Proving again that he is Mike Lindell with tenure."

Social media user @Anatya77 responded to Elias' comment, saying, "What I don’t understand is how GW law school hires staff like Turley!! Are parents paying tuition okay with it? Yikes!"

Jonathan Turley ripped for Trump 'rot in hell' rant response: 'funny if it wasn't so sad'

On Christmas Day 2023, former President Donald Trump posted an angry rant on his Truth Social platform —attacking everyone from President Joe Biden to special counsel Jack Smith.

Trump, in all caps, said of his foes, "MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

The following day, law professor Jonathan Turley went to X, formerly Twitter, and said of the diatribe, "Trump's message of 'May They Rot in Hell...Merry Christmas' is to holiday greetings what Die Hard is to Christmas movies: a matter of considerable interpretation for those of us stuck in the Peace-on-Earth or even just Ho-Ho-Ho mindset."

Turley's tweet has inspired a lot of reactions on X, formerly Twitter.

Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann tweeted, "My god Jon, what is he blackmailing you WITH? It's clearly a doozy."

Chris Cillizza told Turley, "Uh, what?"

Pundit Adam Goldberg tweeted, "For brief moments (there aren't many) when I don't feel embarrassed to have sought out @JonathanTurley's class when I was in school, he goes out of his way to shame an institution I hold dear, @gwlaw, at every possible turn even on a holiday. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad."

Self-described "recovering lawyer" @Nats2024 said of Turley, "How does @gwlaw still employ this clown?"

Pundit Bruce Goldberg tweeted, "The gospel according to @JonathanTurley : 1. Rationalize the irrational 2. Comprehend the incomprehensible 3. Defend the indefensible."

Activist @colmant_ told Turley, "You embarrass yourself on a regular basis."

Trayvon Martin case 'not as conclusive as people think', says legal expert

Defence attorney explains how lack of forensic evidence would complicate potential prosecution of George Zimmerman

Keep reading...Show less

Mass. bill would require divorcing parents to obtain judge's approval for sex

The Massachusetts legislature is conducting hearings Wednesday on a bill that would bar divorcing couples with children from carrying on a sexual relationship while in their own home.

Keep reading...Show less