RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "kyrsten sinema"

Kari Lake earned a senator’s salary for talking and writing: documents

Kari Lake, the probable Republican candidate this year for the U.S. Senate in Arizona, made more money last year just from speaking and writing than she would make as a senator, according to Raw Story’s analysis of her most recent financial disclosure.

That’s $175,000 for Lake — and $174,000 for a U.S. senator.

Lake disclosed the specific terms of her book deal royalty agreement in an amended personal financial disclosure report filed Friday. She reported receiving a $100,000 advance, against 25 percent of net profits from sales, from her book “Unafraid,” released last June.

ALSO READ: 17 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

The Guardian described Lake’s book as a “grievance-packed audition in Lake’s tireless quest to be named [Donald] Trump’s running mate in 2024.”

The Daily Mail says Lake uses the book “to lay out her political manifesto and settle scores, all while describing how she made the move from much loved TV news anchor to one of the county's most divisive politicians.

Kari Lake's second amendment to her financial disclosure report for 2023 includes the terms of her book deal.

Lake’s book failed to reach the level of commercial success achieved by other MAGA-adjacent tomes, including those by members of the Trump family and a roster of Republican senators. The book is published by Winning Team Publishing, which was co-founded in 2021 by Donald Trump Jr.

Lake added the terms of her book deal — omitted in her amended February report and her original January report — as she prepares for Arizona’s July 30 primary.

ALSO READ: Trump-nominated FEC leader: let political donors hide their identities

Lake lost her only general election — for Arizona governor in 2022. She never conceded to Democrat Katie Hobbs after losing the race by more than 17,000 votes. Lake continues to deny the legitimacy of the election, despite losing multiple times in court on the issue.

During 2023, she commanded at least $5,000 — and as much as $15,000 — for each of seven speaking engagements she disclosed between March and September. Only one of the speeches was delivered in Arizona.

Kari Lake's paid speaking appearances in 2023. (Source: U.S. Senate Office of Public Records)

The Washington Post reported recently that Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee, has soured on Lake’s prospects to win the Senate seat this year, despite writing a sunny foreword to her book. Trump has grumbled that Lake could be a drag on his presidential campaign in the key state of Arizona.

Lake’s campaign did not immediately respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Lake faces Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego in November. Through March, the latest federal campaign finance report, Gallego had a substantial lead over Lake in fundraising.

Gallego’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) announced in March that she would not seek reelection after leaving the Democratic Party. Polling showed her finishing third against Gallego and Lake in a three-way race that now will not happen because of Sinema’s departure.

Sinema’s fundraising continues to lag in contested Arizona Senate race

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets. Sign up for their weekly newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) raised over three times as much money as Sen. Krysten Sinema (I-Ariz.) last quarter in his bid to unseat the incumbent senator. He has inched closer to matching Sinema’s war chest each quarter since announcing his candidacy for Arizona’s Senate seat in January.

Sinema has yet to publicly announce her intent to run for reelection, but the former Democrat’s team has signaled that she is gearing up to run as an independent.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene declares war on Republicans

Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Lamb have also declared their candidacies. Lake, who unsuccessfully ran to be Arizona’s governor in 2022, is predicted to be the nominee by a recent GOP poll. Rumors swirled around Republican Blake Masters’ potential run earlier this year, but the venture capitalist, who lost a bid for the U.S. Senate in 2022, has decided to instead run for the U.S. House.

The likely three-way race between Sinema, Gallego and Lake appears to be favoring Gallego. Recent polls show him ahead in most matchups, with Sinema in a distant third. The Cook Political Report ranks the race a toss up.

Gallego, a five-term congressman, has been outraising Sinema all year and continued that trend last quarter, according to an OpenSecrets analysis of campaign finance reports.

Sinema raised $826,000 from July through September, half of what she raised from April through June. She spent most of it, keeping her cash on hand around $10.8 million dollars.

Gallego raised $3.1 million last quarter and spent $1.8 million. His campaign had $1.3 million at the beginning of the year and now has over $5 million.

Credit: OpenSecrets

Lamb ended September with $307,000. Lake launched her campaign after the third quarter ended, so details about her finances will first become available after the end of the fourth quarter early next year.

While Gallego received more money from individual donors, Sinema raised the most from political action committees from July through September. Most of the $175,000 in PAC money Sinema raised came from 55 groups affiliated with companies and interest groups. Sinema also received $10,000 from Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-W.V.) leadership PAC, Country Roads PAC.

Gallego brought in $76,000 from PACs last quarter. About a third of it came from fellow Democrats through leadership PACs, local campaign committees and the Arizona Democratic Party. Most of the rest came from left-leaning interest groups and PACs affiliated with unions.

Indivisible Action, a liberal hybrid PAC, independently spent $13,700 opposing Sinema with digital ads and text messages.

ALSO READ: Trump tripped by 88 pages of contributions that ‘exceed federal limits’

Half of Gallego’s funds last quarter came from small donors who contributed $200 or less. Small donors made up less than 2% of Sinema’s funds during the same period.

The Sinema Leadership Fund, a joint fundraising committee that splits contributions between Sinema’s campaign committee and leadership PAC, solicits funds through the donation processor Democracy Engine. Despite the lack of an official announcement from Sinema, the group’s donation page explicitly asks for donations to “support the re-election of U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.” The joint fundraising committee directed $365,000 to Sinema’s campaign committee from July through September.

Sinema spent $263,000 on digital advertising last quarter. Gallego spent more than double on digital ad buys during the same period.

Lamb spent $15,000 on digital advertising and $12,800 on campaign attire. The Federal Election Commission sent a letter to Lamb following his third quarter report, asking him to clarify the clothing expenses and to ensure they do not constitute a personal expense, which campaign committees cannot pay for. Lamb’s response is due Nov. 24.

Sinema also received a letter from the FEC following her third quarter report, noting that over two dozen contributors gave more to the campaign than the maximum allowed by law. The funds must be reattributed to a different candidate or redesignated for a different election within two months. A response to the FEC is due Nov. 29.

OpenSecrets is a nonpartisan, independent and nonprofit research and news organization tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy.

'Delusions of grandeur': Kyrsten Sinema busted for saying she 'saved the Senate'

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) was mocked for purportedly saying she single-handedly saved the U.S. Senate.

Sinema has consistently remained in the news since parting from the Democratic party. Last month, the ex-Democrat was reported to have privately insisted to donors she has a path to victory that involves winning over Republican voters.

Writing for The New Republic, deputy editor Jason Linkins called Sinema out for comments reported in a new book about Mitt Romney by journalist McKay Coppins.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

"[I]f remarks attributed to her in a new book by McKay Coppins are any guide, she seems sanguine about her future and determined to go out with her trademark delusions of grandeur. As Insider reported this week, Sinema makes a cameo in Coppins’s Romney: A Reckoning, in which she’s totally not mad about her dim reelection prospects," Linkins reported Saturday.

He goes on to quote Sinema from the book's pages.

“I don’t care. I can go on any board I want to. I can be a college president. I can do anything,” she reportedly told Mitt Romney. “I saved the Senate filibuster by myself. I saved the Senate by myself. That’s good enough for me.”

Linkins went on to say that Sinema is "sadly, correct about her chances of cashing out."

"But the idea that she 'saved the Senate' raises a rather obvious question: 'From what, though—and for who?'" he wrote.

"Beyond the fact that Sinema’s claim to have been the sole savior of the filibuster is significant Joe Manchin erasure, depriving the West Virginia senator of the recognition he’s earned for hurting West Virginians, children, and the planet, she’s incorrect on the merits: You can’t simultaneously be a Senate institutionalist and support the filibuster, which is a parliamentary aberration that flies in the face of the Framers’ designs," he added.

Read the article here.

Senators threw a fashion show on the brink of a government shutdown. And then they flew home.

WASHINGTON — The federal government is on the brink of a shutdown. Closures begin Oct. 1 unless Congress acts. The entirely avoidable affair, if recent history is a guide, would be disruptive at best and catastrophic at worst.

But, seemingly, the hottest debate in the U.S. Senate this week wasn’t over military spending or continuing resolutions. It was over … fashion.

Indeed, at the behest of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the sergeant-at-arms nixed the chamber’s buttoned-up dress code, which today’s senators regularly flaunt anyway in deference to a proudly grungy minority.

“I plan to wear a bikini tomorrow!” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) scoffed at the lack of decorum, saying it “debases the institution.” (The 70-year-old senator remained fully clothed in public.)

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) — the bald, tatted-up and usually shorts-donning freshman — sparked the debate by bucking stuffy tradition and casting votes in outfits that’d earn many school children detention. He’s earned significant backlash from Republicans such as Collins and even a few Democrats, such as Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.

“Somehow I will manage,” Fetterman laughed to Raw Story on his way to cast a vote in his usual digs, which means flashing the ink on his thick forearms and showing off his pale calves. “It's just life on the razor's edge here, you know, and I think we're gonna be okay.”

Well, some of us. Federal workers, government contractors and many veterans are bracing for a shutdown that could last hours, days, weeks — who knows! Senators, meanwhile, took their fashion show on the road, literally: They got their usual Thursday all-clear to fly home just before the clock struck 2:30 p.m. EDT this afternoon.

Many of their cars idled outside the Senate chamber early, so they could jet out of Washington, D.C. the second Schumer rang their senatorial school bell.

ALSO READ: GOP lawmaker breaks financial law after ripping opponent for breaking financial law

With the government gripped by yet another manufactured crisis, some lawmakers did hurriedly try to save face. Almost on cue this afternoon, an exasperated group rolled out their No Budget, No Pay Act. The measure cuts off lawmaker’s paychecks until they do their most basic duty: keep the government’s lights on.

No Budget, No Pay isn’t new. It’s unfurled whenever politicians fail to make laws and instead produce nauseating gridlock. While lawmakers are now criticizing party leaders for not keeping Congress in session all summer, there weren’t No Budget, No Pay press conferences in July. What happened in July? Congress worked three of its four weeks – because of course they get all of July Fourth week off – the month before Congress gave itself all of August off, with House members taking an extra week to unwind after Labor Day, even as the Senate flew into town for a decidedly light three-day week.

This week, the funding crisis was debated in secret, even as lawmakers held more than a dozen press conferences … on not government funding. The countdown clock was muddled by competing pushes to ban federal mask mandates, end the 20+ year old Iraq war authorization, enhance rail safety, decarbonize “the American commute,” push the Farm Bill, celebrate Recovery Month – to name just a few.

You’d be forgiven if you wanted to bury yourself inside a Fetterman-style hoodie, size XXXL.

Things devolved so much between the fringe-right and Speaker Kevin McCarthy that on Wednesday lawmakers, Capitol Police officers, attendants and staffers readied for a working weekend in Washington. But by this afternoon – shortly after senators got their greenlight to jet-set away from their duties – matters devolved even further. Everyone effectively gave up. House members, too, were given the weekend off, as originally scheduled.

Still, attire was the talk of the Senate. And, it seems, of The View as well, as Fetterman was alerted by a reporter, who noted: “Alyssa Farah Griffin – you know, who is a Republican but a very strong Trump critic – has said that ‘you should dress for the job you want.’ She said this on The View this week.”

“I don't know whoever said that. I can tell you, I really don't spend any time thinking or caring about what and how they dress. I'm not sure why they would be obsessed with how I dress,” Fetterman, who apparently doesn’t watch much daytime TV, either, said. Fetterman laughed as said reporter casually mentioned former President Donald Trump’s name in an argument about respect for the Senate.

“But it's like, the same people that are upset that because I dress like a slob, you know, [were] all ready to support Donald Trump, who encouraged his followers to trash the actual institution and endanger [lives],” Fetterman said. “I wish I had the kind of mind that could hold those kinds of opposing views at the same time.”

The junior senator needed just look across the aisle for tips on juggling antithetical views.

This week, in rebuttal to the rules of old being upended, close to half the Senate – 46 Republicans – signed onto a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer advocating for the “honor and tradition” of the Senate, which they say is tied to the western attire its male members have worn since slaves constructed the majestic Rotunda overhead.

“I just think it's appropriate. I mean, if you're on the Senate floor – it’s a big deal to get up here, right? And so we represent the American public and so I think we ought to look the part,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), who spearheaded the “Dear Leader” letter, told Raw Story.

Scott says — unlike the steady anti-Fetterman drumbeat in conservative media circles — his letter wasn’t aimed at just one senator.

“No. This is just, someone on his own tried to change the policy and, I think, if you want to do that why not bring it to the floor to talk about it?” Scott said.

It’s not just older members such as Scott who’ve joined Team Brooks Brothers over Team Cargo Shorts.

Other freshman senators – ones known to dress casually on their fly-in and fly-out of Washington days – are also now fierce defenders of an unwritten, arcane dress code.

“Show respect for the office,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) told Raw Story.

“Forget about decorum, it’s respect. I'm not a suit and tie guy. You’ll never see me in a suit and tie in Oklahoma, but I had a guy – a long time ago – who said, ‘I wear a suit out of respect for you.’ And I wear it out of respect for the office.”

Mullin offers an example.

“What would you say if a doctor showed up to do surgery on you and he's in a hoodie and a pair of shorts? And he’s in a surgical room and you're like, ‘You’re my guy? No.’ You do dress the part,” Mullin argued.

Tieless? Mullin’s cool with that.

“There's business casual, which is polos and a pair jeans or slacks. And you have business, which can be no tie or with tie. And you have business formal, which is with a tie. So just go business,” Mullin said.

The issue isn’t new to Fetterman who’s regularly mocked on conservative media for his casual wears and his stuttering as he’s recovering from a debilitating stroke.

“Fox News and whatever — their world is shattered, you know, because, you know, I'm America's decline and, you know, all this other stuff,” Fetterman said. “So I don't know if it's the clicks, you know, or whatever, but I really feel like we have more important things to be talking about and addressing.”

Just 9 1/2 more days until Shutdown Day. Or, in Senate time, just another few days in politics as usual.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema's seat gets another new challenger: report

Blake Masters may have failed in his 2022 campaign effort for the U.S. Senate, but he's trying again, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, citing people familiar with his plans.

The seat is currently held by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), who switched parties after it became clear she couldn't win a Democratic primary.

Masters' campaign in 2022 was heavily supported by billionaire Peter Thiel, and pumped in $15 million for a pro-Masters super PAC. It's unknown if Thiel will be willing to do that again in 2024.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Due to the growing distaste for Sinema among Democrats, there is a concern that the seat could become a Republican pickup with Sinema splitting the vote between her and leading Democratic candidate, Rep. Ruben Gallego (D- AZ) in a three-way race.

There were questions of whether the temptation could draw Republican Kari Lake into the race, setting Masters "on a collision course," the report explained. County Sheriff Mark Lamb has already announced that he intends to run for the seat, but he's not bringing in any "significant" money.

Read the full report at the Wall Street Journal.

Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema continues using liberal platforms to fundraise for 2024 reelection campaign

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets. Sign up for their weekly newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) announced her departure from the Democratic Party last December, but the first-term U.S. senator still uses platforms typically utilized by Democrats and progressives to raise money for her 2024 reelection campaign, which has yet to be formally announced.

Sinema’s campaign committee reported raising over $2.1 million in the first three months of 2023, ending March with $10 million on hand. Over $1 million was transferred from the Sinema Leadership Fund, a joint fundraising committee that splits contributions between Sinema’s campaign committee and her leadership PAC, Getting Stuff Done.

The joint fundraising committee’s donation page explicitly states that funds will go in part to Sinema’s 2024 reelection, OpenSecrets found, even though the senator has not officially announced her candidacy. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that an internal presentation suggests Sinema is gearing up to run as an independent.

Donations to the joint fundraising committee are facilitated through Democracy Engine, which describes itself as a nonpartisan for-profit donation processor but almost exclusively raises money for Democratic politicians. If Sinema instead decides to run in the Democratic primary and loses, Arizona law would bar her from running in the general election as an independent.

Although Sinema was not up for reelection during the 2022 midterms, she was the largest recipient of funds through Democracy Engine during the last election cycle. In addition to money from her joint fundraising committee, about $220,000 of Sinema’s 2023 contributions were facilitated through Democracy Engine.

Democracy Engine declined to comment.

Sinema has also continued to raise money through ActBlue, an “online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot, progressive organizations, and nonprofits.” In the first quarter of 2023, at least $450,000 of Sinema’s fundraising came through ActBlue. During that time, Sinema’s campaign paid ActBlue and Democracy Engine about $18,000 and $13,000 in merchant fees, respectively.

In the past, ActBlue has kicked some politicians off of its platform due to scandals or political affiliation changes. High-profile examples include former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost access to the platform amid his 2021 sexual harassment scandal, and Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), who was reportedly removed by ActBlue when he switched to the Republican party in 2019.

ActBlue declined to comment for this story, but its website specifies the criteria used to determine which candidate can use the platform. While independents are usually barred from ActBlue in races that feature a Democrat, an exception is made for incumbents that have “a proven history of caucusing with Democrats,” which Sinema has continued to do after her party shift.

Sinema did not respond to OpenSecrets’ requests for comment.

Senate race landscape still sparse

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) is the only prominent Democrat to announce his bid for Sinema’s U.S. Senate seat so far. Gallego was first elected to the U.S. House in 2014, representing Arizona’s 7th Congressional District until last year, when he was elected to serve in the state’s 3rd Congressional District after redistricting.

Based in Phoenix, both districts are solidly Democratic, and Gallego won each of his elections with at least 75% of the vote. The Cook Political Report rates the Arizona Senate race a “toss up.”

So far, Sinema has a significant cash advantage over Gallego, though Gallego raised more funds in the first quarter of 2023.

After outraising a challenger vying for his House seat 39-fold in the 2022 midterms, Gallego left the year with $1.3 million on hand. Since launching his Senate bid in late January, Gallego raised $3.8 million and spent $2.3 million, leaving his Senate campaign with $2.7 million at the end of March.

Over half of Gallego’s funds are made up of small donations from individual donors giving $200 or less. An OpenSecrets analysis found that small-donor contributions made up less than 1% of contributions to Sinema.

Most of the money spent by Gallego’s 2024 Senate campaign went to Aisle 518 Strategies, a progressive political firm that has been used by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and others. The $1.6 million Gallego’s campaign paid to Aisle 518 Strategies so far went to digital consulting, list acquisition, SMS and digital fundraising services.

Democratic politicians — like Kelly and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — have largely refrained from endorsing either candidate in Arizona’s U.S. Senate race, often citing how much time lies between now and the election. However, the campaigns of Democratic California Reps. Nancy Pelosi, Eric Swalwell and Ted Lieu have contributed to Gallego’s campaign.

On the other side of the aisle, Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb is the most prominent Republican to have announced a bid for Arizona’s U.S. Senate seat. Lamb officially launched his campaign shortly after the first quarter FEC filing deadline so his first fundraising report will not be available until July.

According to February polling data from O.H. Predictive Insights, Gallego is favored to win head-to-head matchups against Sinema and all other potential candidates. Other potential Republican candidates include former Arizona GOP candidate for U.S. Senate Blake Masters and former Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

OpenSecrets is a nonpartisan, independent and nonprofit research and news organization tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy.

​Sen. Kyrsten Sinema no longer a California winery intern

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s new personal financial disclosure is notable for something that doesn't appear on the document.

Sinema (I-AZ) appears to have not reprised her two-week internship at a winery in California, which she reported in her 2020 financial disclosure.

The gig — an odd pursuit for a sitting U.S. senator, to say the least — paid her $1,170.40.

Sinema earned praise from the winery for being hardworking while doing manual labor. But it’s the opposite image that hangs over her as she faces tough competition for reelection in 2024.

A report last week detailed Sinema’s lavish spending of campaign funds on private jets, chauffeurs, and fancy hotels and restaurants. The restaurants were in New York, London, Paris, and Barcelona.

And yes, there was wine, too. Lots of wine. In all, Sinema’s campaign committee spent nearly $20,000 on wine since 2021, according to federal records analyzed by the New York Post.

Sinema has also spent hundreds of thousands of donor dollars on a private security detail.

Sinema’s press secretary did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

RELATED ARTICLE: Why Kyrsten Sinema jumped the Democratic Party after they took a 51-seat Senate majority

The New York Post report said Democratic donors were upset with what they considered extravagant spending. Sinema was a Democrat before becoming an independent late last year.

Sinema’s personal financial disclosure filing, which covers activity during calendar year 2022, filing indicated the senator did have one side gig, earning reportable income of $24,174 in the form of an “approved teaching fee” from Arizona State University.

In addition to a Republican candidate — possibly also-ran gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake — Sinema will likely face Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) for her senate seat.

A Jezebel report Monday, citing polling contained in an internal memo from the Gallego campaign, said that a mere 27% of voters view Sinema favorably. But in a three-way general election, she may face somewhat better odds than in a two-way race, particularly given her incumbency and statewide notoriety.

Biden nominee to head FAA withdraws after Republican criticism

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — U.S. President Joe Biden's nominee to head the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is withdrawing his nomination after Republican criticism that he was not qualified to serve as the top aviation regulator.

Last year, Biden nominated Denver International Airport CEO Phil Washington to serve as FAA administrator. A spokesperson for Washington at the airport did not immediately comment.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg late Saturday confirmed Washington's withdrawal first reported by Reuters.

"The partisan attacks and procedural obstruction he has faced are undeserved, but I respect his decision to withdraw and am grateful for his service," Buttigieg said on Twitter.

The agency has faced numerous safety questions in recent months after a series of close-call safety incidents and the Senate Commerce Committee earlier this week delayed a vote on his nomination citing outstanding questions by some lawmakers. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, an independent, had not announced whether she would support him and Sen. Jon Tester, a Democrat, also was still considering how to vote, a spokeswoman said this week.

Sen. Ted Cruz, ranking Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, said late Saturday that it has been clear since his nomination that "Mr. Washington lacked the aviation experience necessary to run the FAA ... The Biden administration must now quickly name someone to head the FAA who has an extensive aviation background, can earn widespread bipartisan support in the Senate, and will keep the flying public safe."

Cruz and other Republicans had said Washington, who retired from the U.S. Army in July 2000, needed a waiver from rules requiring civilian leadership to head the FAA. The Transportation Department's general counsel said Washington was fully qualified and did not need a waiver.

Cruz noted Washington has only about two years of experience as an airport CEO and criticized Washington's inability to answer some aviation questions at his confirmation hearing.

The White House insisted Washington was fully qualified. Cantwell had said he would shakeup the agency saying "we feel that industry and FAA got too cozy."

A White House official had earlier told Reuters "politics must not hold up confirming an administrator to lead the FAA, and we will move expeditiously to nominate a new candidate for FAA administrator."

The official said "an onslaught of unfounded Republican attacks on Mr Washington’s service and experience irresponsibly delayed this process, threatened unnecessary procedural hurdles on the Senate floor, and ultimately have led him to withdraw his nomination today."

Washington was originally nominated in July but did not get a hearing from the Commerce Committee until March 1.

The FAA has had a number of recent safety issues.

In January, the FAA halted all departing passenger airline flights for nearly two hours because of a pilot messaging database outage, the first nationwide ground stop of its kind since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

On Wednesday, the FAA issued a safety alert to airlines, pilots and others about the "need for continued vigilance and attention to mitigation of safety risks" after a series of high-profile near collisions.

Six serious runway incursions have occurred since January that prompted the agency to convene a safety summit last week.

Some industry officials think the White House could name acting FAA Administrator Billy Nolen as a new nominee. Nolen, who was named head of the FAA's aviation safety office, has been the acting FAA administrator since April 2022 and has received backing from many Republicans in Congress.

Washington had won support from a wide range of groups, including a number of aviation unions and a group of family members of some killed in a 2019 fatal Boeing 737 MAX crash.

The FAA has been without a permanent administrator for almost a year.

This was the second major Bide nominee to withdraw in recent weeks. Gigi Sohn, his pick for a key fifth seat on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), withdrew dealing a setback for Democrats who have been unable to take control of the telecom regulator for more than two years.

(Reporting by David Shepardson, editing by Deepa Babington and Marguerita Choy, Robert Birsel)

Democrats may get infuriated by their red-state senators — but they'll shut up to stay in power

Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (WV) and Jon Tester (MT) joined Republican senators this week in blocking a Labor Department rule that allowed money managers to give greater importance to the environment when making investment decisions.

This bipartisan gambit was an affront to President Joe Biden and the Democrats’ commitment to greener investments through consideration of environmental, social and governance factors. The senators’ statements about their own party’s president were jarring.

Manchin said, “It is irresponsible of the Biden Administration to jeopardize retirement savings for more than 150 million Americans for purely political purposes,” the Hill reported.

From Tester: “It undermines retirement accounts for working Montanans and is wrong for my state.”

In another time, this sort of defection might have brought howls of protest from fellow Democrats. Just two years ago, Manchin and then-Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema were roundly condemned for blocking their party’s effort to end the filibuster on key issues.

But this week, Democrats largely refrained from calling out their colleagues. The absence of intramural ado underscores how the prospect of Democrats losing control of the Senate — and all of Congress — has changed them.

Democrats, with their bare-bones Senate majority, face a daunting election map in 2024. Republicans are only defending only 11 of the 34 seats on the ballot. The deep-red states of West Virginia and Montana — represented by Tester and Manchin — loom as the two most vulnerable Democratic seats. The only other Democratic seat held in a red state is in Ohio, where a Sen. Sherrod Brown — a more traditional liberal — could face a tough reelection challenge.

READ MORE: Bernie Sanders the anti-capitalist capitalist at $273 a ticket

Tester announced his reelection bid on February 22. But Manchin, the Democrats’ most vulnerable target, hasn’t committed to running again. He has even teased the idea of running for president — but not as a Democrat.

While Democrats find themselves in peril, Brian Rosenwald, a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, told Raw Story it’s too early for them to panic.

“So much in many states depends on the presidential race, and right now Joe Biden is the favorite to be reelected,” Rosenwald, a national expert on elections, says. “If you look at the history of this country, we’re loath to fire presidents.”

Rosenwald said the outlook wasn’t as bad as the election map math might suggest — in part because of the power of incumbency. He also said he doesn’t see a “red wave” in the offing. But he added that Democrats would struggle to find seats to flip among the 11 Republicans on the ballot.

The Cook Political Report rates 10 of the GOP seats as “solid Republican,” with just one seat — held by Sen. Rick Scott of Florida — considered “likely Republican.”

READ MORE: 0-for-1,523: Senators attempt to explain why they never punish other senators for ethics violations

On the Democratic side, 15 seats — including those occupied by left-leaning independent Sens. Bernie Sanders (VT) and Angus King (ME) — are rated “Solid D.”

Of the remaining eight, Cook Political Report scores five as “Likely D,” including Tester’s Montana seat. Others in the “likely” column include Sens. Bob Casey, (D-PA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Michigan’s open seat.

That leaves three “tossups”: the seats held by Manchin in West Virginia and Brown in Ohio, along with Arizona, where independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema faces re-election after leaving the Democratic Party (while still caucusing with it).

Rosenwald regards Arizona, which could host a general election with three viable candidates, as thoroughly unpredictable, at least for now.

Rosenwald sees Casey as having “virtually no jeopardy because he has a unique amount of popularity and the Republicans’ ceiling is so low in Pennsylvania.” He also agrees that the Democrats should be favored in Wisconsin, Michigan and Nevada — almost not as unbeatable.

As for Manchin, Tester and Casey, Rosenwald had a different outlook.

“I think Manchin is probably toast,” he said. “But if you told me Tester and Brown won, I wouldn’t be surprised. In fact, I’d call either of them a favorite, except for the fact that Trump can bring out voters in Montana that no one else brings out.”

READ MORE: Springsteen, axe throwing, 'rage room': Dem senator hosts unconventional re-election fundraisers

On the Republican side, Rosenwald concurs that nine Republican seats are solid red, and that Scott is likely – but not a lock – to win reelection in Florida.

And he added this about Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX):

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center on March 2, 2023 in National Harbor, Maryland. Alex Wong/Getty Images

“Cruz is the least likable politician on the Planet Earth right now,” Rosenwald observed. “So, although it’s not likely he’ll lose, his re-election is not certain. In a different year, he would lose because no one likes him, beyond partisan politics.”

And Rosenwald had one more observation that might provide some solace to Democrats: The presence of a House Republican majority will spare them some of the intra-party anguish of 2022.

“I don’t think the Senate is going to do a lot of voting on issues in 2023 and 2024,” Rosenwald said. “In 2021 and 2022, it made sense to make those guys take tough votes, because there was a chance of passing things. But now, anything liberal the Senate passes has a zero prayer of passing the House now.

“They do need to protect Brown, Tester and Manchin. So, my guess is the Senate spends a lot of time confirming judges, holding hearings and then passing compromise appropriations bills and (hopefully) bipartisan deals with the House to raise the debt ceiling and keep the government open. Anything else they vote on will be broad bipartisan legislation that probably bubbles up from committees and the rank and file.”

“If anything,” Rosenwald said, “I could see [Senate Majority Leader Chuck] Schumer giving votes to stuff that would bolster Tester, Manchin and Brown.”

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.