If Trump wins in 2024 he’ll use Colorado ruling to keep Dems off the ballot: ex-aide

Alyssa Farah Griffin
Alyssa Farah Griffin (Photo: Screen capture from The View/ABC video)

Former White House aide Alyssa Farah Griffin sounded the alarm on Tuesday about the Colorado ruling that barred Donald Trump from the ballot citing the 14th Amendment. Her fear, she said, is that he'll use it himself if he wins in 2024.

"The View" co-hosts on Tuesday were addressing some of the main news stories they'd missed while off for the holidays.

"Now, you remember, none of this would have been happening had he let the people decide who they wanted to be president," said Whoopi Goldberg. "He didn't like that. He didn't want that. And he has spent all of this time fighting that and saying that, you know, it was a lie, it was this, it was that. He's been tossed out all over the place and now suddenly they're paying attention to the law. Where has everybody been? Did you just wake up and go, oh, damn?"

She noted it is still up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which will ultimately make the decision on the Colorado ruling, which states that the ex-president can't stand for public office because he took part in an insurrection. A similar ruling was also made in Maine last week.

"They say it will be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if they bar him," said Goldberg. "If you do this kind of stuff, you can't run, but apparently we always have to recheck with this fool because every time he does something they say, oh, well, they didn't mean him."

Sunny Hostin, a former federal prosecutor, said that so many of the Republican appointees to the Supreme Court claim to be textualists and she thinks that if the text of the law really is followed, then Trump would not be on the ballot.

But it was Griffin, a former aide in Trump's White House, who cautioned how Trump might weaponize the ruling in Colorado to attack his foes.

ALSO READ: Judgment year has arrived: Will America pass her greatest test yet or will she fail?

"I'm conflicted," she began. "I tend to be more of an originalist. When you look at the law, you think of the precedents. If this holds, if Donald Trump becomes — if he, God forbid becomes president this time next year — he could weaponize that ruling to keep Democrats off the ballot, in the same way, he says Joe Biden is a threat to democracy."

She noted that there are secretaries of state and appointed judges who are all firmly in Trump's back pocket who will be "loyal to him. They will weaponize the same decision."

"Democracy is very fragile right now," she continued. "A third of Republicans don't believe the last election was legitimate. I believe it was. My fear is for the first time, they will say I can't cast my vote for Donald Trump and the system threw it out. Then it will be true."

See the debate in the video below or at the link here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump used profane language to scold Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for trying to downplay progress on ending the war in Gaza.

According to Axios, Trump expected Netanyahu to declare victory after Hamas agreed to return the remaining hostages, but wanted to negotiate other parts of the peace deal. Netanyahu, however, discounted the importance of the progress.

"Bibi told Trump this is nothing to celebrate, and that it doesn't mean anything," one source told Axios.

"I don't know why you're always so f------ negative. This is a win. Take it," Trump reportedly fired back.

Netanyahu eventually accepted the conditions and ordered an end to air strikes in exchange for the hostages.

In an interview with Axios on Saturday, Trump said that the deal gave Israel a "chance for victory." And he said Netanyahu had eventually agreed to get on board.

"He was fine with it. He's got to be fine with it. He has no choice. With me, you got to be fine," the U.S. president insisted.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Fox News predicted that rising food prices would cause Republicans to struggle during next year's midterm elections.

During a Sunday segment on Fox & Friends, host Charlie Hurt pointed to "record highs is nationwide."

"If food prices, beef prices don't get under control, we're going to have — Republicans are going to have a problem next year," he said.

Brianna Lyman of the Federalist made excuses for high food costs.

"I think Republicans will have a problem, but we also have to think of why this happened," she remarked. "Look, there were severe droughts in Texas, Kansas, I think Oklahoma, and other states where, you know, ranchers predominantly work."

"And when they lost all their grass, they had to basically, according to one guest who joined Fox Business, liquidate their cattle," Lyman added. "But good to have demand."

Donald Trump received a legal smackdown from a judge the president himself appointed, and a former Trump insider sees it as a "signal" for what is coming next.

Raw Story reported on the "bombshell ruling," in which Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, ruled that Trump's National Guard call-up to Portland was based on false claims about unrest in the liberal city. That ruling also made waves online.

Enter Soviet-born Parnas, who worked closely with Rudy Giuliani during Trump's first administration, and was purportedly sent to Ukraine to help Trump and Giuliani make contacts there for the purposes of digging up negative info on Hunter Biden. Parnas was later convicted of campaign finance violations, and today the analyst reports on Trump from outside the administration.

"I’m writing with good news — real good news — and as soon as I heard it, I knew I had to share it with you right away," Parnas wrote on Substack after the ruling. "A federal judge — one that Trump himself appointed — just ruled that Trump cannot deploy the National Guard into Portland, at least for the next two weeks."

According to Parnas, this is more than just a procedural win in court. It could be a sign that Trump's policies are beginning to meet checks and balances, the analyst suggested

"Think about that: even judges he hand-picked are starting to push back against his most dangerous power grabs," according to Parnas. "This isn’t just a legal win — it’s a signal that the walls around Trump’s authoritarian playbook are beginning to crack."

Parnas continued, highlighting what he sees as an important quote from the ruling.

"In her ruling, Judge Karin Immergut — a Trump appointee — wrote, 'This is a nation of constitutional law, not of martial law.' Those words matter," he wrote. "They carry the weight of history. She made it clear that no president, no matter how powerful or angry, can bypass the Constitution to use the U.S. military against American citizens. Coming from someone he appointed, this is more than a courtroom decision — it’s a line drawn in the sand."

Read the full piece here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}