If Trump wins in 2024 he’ll use Colorado ruling to keep Dems off the ballot: ex-aide

Alyssa Farah Griffin
Alyssa Farah Griffin (Photo: Screen capture from The View/ABC video)

Former White House aide Alyssa Farah Griffin sounded the alarm on Tuesday about the Colorado ruling that barred Donald Trump from the ballot citing the 14th Amendment. Her fear, she said, is that he'll use it himself if he wins in 2024.

"The View" co-hosts on Tuesday were addressing some of the main news stories they'd missed while off for the holidays.

"Now, you remember, none of this would have been happening had he let the people decide who they wanted to be president," said Whoopi Goldberg. "He didn't like that. He didn't want that. And he has spent all of this time fighting that and saying that, you know, it was a lie, it was this, it was that. He's been tossed out all over the place and now suddenly they're paying attention to the law. Where has everybody been? Did you just wake up and go, oh, damn?"

She noted it is still up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which will ultimately make the decision on the Colorado ruling, which states that the ex-president can't stand for public office because he took part in an insurrection. A similar ruling was also made in Maine last week.

"They say it will be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if they bar him," said Goldberg. "If you do this kind of stuff, you can't run, but apparently we always have to recheck with this fool because every time he does something they say, oh, well, they didn't mean him."

Sunny Hostin, a former federal prosecutor, said that so many of the Republican appointees to the Supreme Court claim to be textualists and she thinks that if the text of the law really is followed, then Trump would not be on the ballot.

But it was Griffin, a former aide in Trump's White House, who cautioned how Trump might weaponize the ruling in Colorado to attack his foes.

ALSO READ: Judgment year has arrived: Will America pass her greatest test yet or will she fail?

"I'm conflicted," she began. "I tend to be more of an originalist. When you look at the law, you think of the precedents. If this holds, if Donald Trump becomes — if he, God forbid becomes president this time next year — he could weaponize that ruling to keep Democrats off the ballot, in the same way, he says Joe Biden is a threat to democracy."

She noted that there are secretaries of state and appointed judges who are all firmly in Trump's back pocket who will be "loyal to him. They will weaponize the same decision."

"Democracy is very fragile right now," she continued. "A third of Republicans don't believe the last election was legitimate. I believe it was. My fear is for the first time, they will say I can't cast my vote for Donald Trump and the system threw it out. Then it will be true."

See the debate in the video below or at the link here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Donald Trump's administration committed a "grave and indefensible violation" with a mistake it made in the production of certain Epstein files, according to a survivor of the deceased financier's abuse.

Lawyer and journalist Aaron Parnas flagged the letter from the Epstein survivor on social media. Parnas wrote, "Jane Doe Epstein Survivor, who reported Epstein to the FBI in 2009, sent the following letter to the Department of Justice today after it failed to redact her name in the release of the files. I have confirmed her name is currently not redacted in multiple public files."

The letter itself says in part, "I am a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein. I write to place the Department of Justice on formal notice of a grave and indefensible violation arising from the December 19, 2025 release of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act."

"In that release, my name and/or identifying information was disclosed publicly without proper redaction," the letter reads. "At the same time-and astonishingly-the DOJ and FBI continue to withhold my own FBI file."

PatriotTakes, which purports to track right-wing extremism, saw the letter and wrote, "Pam Bondi was more worried about protecting Trump than the victims."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Susie Wiles was quick to call Donald Trump out for "a lie" about Jeffrey Epstein, according to a journalist who recently published a bombshell piece on the White House Chief of Staff.

Chris Whipple, who recently wrote an article for Vanity Fair profiling Wiles and her team in the White House, appeared on a podcast with former GOP strategist Rick Wilson Saturday. Whipple gave several details from his months-long investigation into Wiles.

At the end of the interview, Wilson asked Whipple what he heard about the Epstein files from his perch on the inside of the White House.

Detailing his on-the-record conversation with Wiles, Whipple said, "She was... she said, 'Look, the president was wrong.'"

"Trump as we all know has been going around saying that Bill Clinton went to the island supposedly 28 times... well, maybe whenever Trump uses the word supposedly, when he qualifies anything in any way, maybe he knows he's lying," Whipple said. "But she called it a lie."

Whipple added, "I was stunned-astonished she would even go there with me."

"We talked all about the Epstein files and about how Trump is in the Epstein files, and all over it, and she said they were playboys," he added. "She said Trump isn't in the files doing anything awful, but she also says there's nothing incriminating about Clinton in the files."

JD Vance once had a lot to say about the Epstein files, and one Republican lawmaker on Saturday reminded the vice president of his words.

Vance has largely been silent about the release of Epstein files by Trump's DOJ, which was required under a law passed by lawmakers and signed into law by President Donald Trump himself. The administration has been accused of breaking the law with the release, which some analysts have referred to as "botched."

GOP rep. Thomas Massie over the weekend recalled a prior "version" of Vance, and threw it in the V.P.'s face.

Massie dug up a still-published post from Vance in 2021. At that time, Vance wrote, "What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh…"

Then Massie stepped in with seven words as a response.

"I miss this version of JD Vance," he wrote on social media.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}