Judge slaps Trump with $9K in fines — and warns 'jail may be a necessary punishment'

New York Judge Juan Merchan has ruled in the dispute over whether former President Donald Trump violated the gag order in the Manhattan hush money trial. He has determined that Trump violated the order in at least nine separate instances.

The decision means that the former president will be fined $9,000 and will be forced to remove the offending posts that violated the gag order from his Truth Social page.

What's more, as flagged by legal reporter Adam Klasfeld, Merchan warned Trump that he could be incarcerated if he continues to flout his gag order.

Merchan said that New York state law does not permit him to escalate fines against Trump, which led him to conclude that the court "must therefore consider whether in some instances, jail may be a necessary punishment" for future violations.

This comes after a contentious hearing last week, during which Merchan sharply rebuked Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche for his arguments in support of his client, saying that they were not credible.

The gag order imposed on Trump in the case, which centers on allegations he falsified business records to cover up hush payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels to suppress negative information about himself from voters in the 2016 election, is relatively permissive, allowing him to criticize Merchan, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and the charges against him generally. However, he is prohibited from disparaging likely witnesses, and the family of court officers, among other things.

ALSO READ: A criminologist explains why Trump’s Manhattan trial is the biggest threat to his freedom

At issue is the fact that the former president has continued to publicly attack Michael Cohen, his former attorney and fixer who arranged the payment to Daniels and is set to testify he did it on Trump's instruction. Most experts have argued that this is a violation of the order, as Cohen is one of the central witnesses in the case.

Trump and his defense counsel, for his part, have argued that he did not violate the gag order because he was simply re-upping criticism of Cohen posted by other figures, like Fox News' Jesse Watters, and not speaking in his own voice.

In the past, Trump was issued sanctions for violating gag orders in his civil trials, which resulted in thousands of dollars in fines. However, this was the first time he faced contempt of court allegations for a gag order in a criminal proceeding.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A legal expert shared a sobering prediction on Sunday as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on one of President Donald Trump's most recent appeals.

Last week, the Trump administration sought to prevent a lower court from enjoining its new rules prohibiting the Postal Service from creating a national voter database and only sending mail-in ballots to people on that list. The Supreme Court may rule on that appeal this week from the shadow docket, argued Joyce Vance, a former federal prosecutor, in a new Substack essay.

"This is going to be a key moment," she wrote.

Trump filed the appeal less than 100 days before the midterm elections, which Vance argued means he is growing increasingly concerned about losing power.

"However the Court rules, the fact that we are even here is the ultimate criticism of this administration," Vance wrote. "Under the Constitution, the choice of elected officials belongs to the people. Donald Trump is deathly afraid of what that means."

"Efforts to circumvent the vote are inherently undemocratic and this shouldn’t be treated like just another routine court case," she added. "The EO is not business as usual, and we should not treat it as though it is. It is a maneuver designed to wrest control from the people and place it in the hands of Trump and the privileged few powerful conservatives and wealthy oligarchs who have slid into (or written checks into) his favor, in hopes of controlling our future."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Fox News has spent a lot of airtime talking about the personal diaries of Anthony Fauci, but most of it has been complete hot air, according to one analyst.

Last week, Fox News devoted significant time to reviewing and reporting on Fauci's diary, which some Republicans released ahead of a contentious hearing he attended about the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Republicans painted Fauci as an egomaniac who was out for fame, even as the 85-year-old former White House physician pled the Fifth more than 100 times.

Will Saletan, a writer at The Bulwark, analyzed several of the clips Fox News played for its audience in a new podcast episode. He found that many of them were based on fabricated claims from Trump officials like Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

One of the claims that Saletan harped on was Kennedy's insistence that multiple government agencies listed "pulmonary infarction" as a side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Saletan said Kennedy was "just lying" about the claim altogether.

There's nothing about pulmonary infarction on this list. Kennedy told you there was, but there isn't. In fact, pulmonary infarction is not an expected adverse event from the vaccines," Saletan said. "Why did Kennedy say it was? Because that's what he does. He makes things up."

Saletan also addressed Fox News' claim that Fauci was more concerned about fame than helping Americans during the pandemic.

"Look, it's not Fauci who wanted to tell everybody about his personal life," Saletan said. "It's these scumbags who dug up the diary and plastered it all over TV. The dishonesty on Fox [News] is just incredible."

President Donald Trump sparked outrage on Sunday after he seemed to downplay the allegations against Rep. Max Miller (R-OH).

Miller has been accused of domestic and child abuse by his ex-wife, Emily Moreno, the daughter of Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH). Emily Moreno accused her ex-husband of pouring hot water on her, holding a gun to her head, and acting violently toward her lawyer. Miller has denied all allegations and has vowed to continue his reelection campaign.

Trump was asked about whether Miller should resign while speaking with reporters on Air Force One.

"Well, I'm going to look at it. So far it's accusations," Trump said. "I'll be looking at it."

Trump's comments set off a firestorm online.

"This is MAGA," the MeidasTouch Network posted on X.

"Imagine the outcry if Dem leadership had done with Graham Platner what Trump is doing with Max Miller. And yet you hear crickets from so many professional conservatives, including and especially publicly religious conservatives who claim to cherish family values," Pedro L. Gonzalez, a writer, posted on X. “'Hypocrite' isn’t nearly strong enough a word to describe the immorality of conservatives who ride moral high horses for a living."

"A rapist and an abuser protecting another abuser. Family values!" Wajahat Ali, author of "The Left Hook" on Substack, posted on X.

"But when they were against Platner it was 'game over.' F--- this rapist," Joanne Carducci, a political commentator known as JoJoFromJerz online, posted on X.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}