Quantcast
Connect with us

Beijing sanctions US defense firms, freezes arms control talks

Published

on

China said Saturday it was suspending military exchanges and security talks with Washington and would impose sanctions on US firms involved in a 6.4 billion-dollar deal to sell arms to Taiwan.

A statement from the foreign ministry a day after Washington approved the sale said Beijing would also halt high level talks on arms control and non-proliferation.

“Cooperation between China and the US on key international and regional issues will also inevitably be affected,” the ministry said.

“China will also implement relevant sanctions on US companies involved in the arms sales to Taiwan,” it added.

The measures were announced a day after Washington approved the sale of an arms package that includes Patriot missiles, Black Hawk helicopters, and communications equipment for Taiwan’s F-16 fleet.

ADVERTISEMENT

The last US arms package for Taiwan, announced under previous president George W. Bush in October 2008, also led China to cut off military relations with the United States temporarily.

But this time the sanctions went further.

Defence ministry spokesman Huang Xueping said the measures reflected the “severe harm” the weapons deal presented.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It runs counter to the principles of the joint statement issued during US President Barack Obama’s visit to China in November,” Huang told the official Xinhua news agency.

China considers Taiwan, where nationalists fled in 1949 after losing the mainland’s civil war, a territory awaiting reunification, by force if necessary. It had warned Washington repeatedly against the arms sales.

Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou, on a flight home from a state visit to Central America, said the sales would help the island further develop ties with China.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It will let Taiwan feel more confident and secure so we can have more interactions with China,” Ma was quoted by Taiwan’s Central News Agency as saying.

Taiwan’s defense ministry was also upbeat, saying: “The defense ministry welcomes and thanks the US decision…. This would enable Taiwan to be more confident in seeking reconciliation with China and help peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.”

“The various defensive weapons provided by the US will also facilitate the transformation and modernization of our national defense,” the Taiwanese ministry said.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Beijing, however, the deal’s approval set in motion a flurry of angry activity.

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei made an urgent official protest to the US ambassador in Beijing, Jon Huntsman, Chinese officials told AFP.

The Chinese defense ministry also summoned the US Embassy’s defense attache on Saturday afternoon to notify Washington military ties had been suspended, Xinhua reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the statement delivered to Huntsman, He urged Washington to cancel the deal, which he said would “inevitably damage China-US relations… causing results that both sides do not want to see”.

The deal constituted “crude interference in China’s internal affairs that seriously endangers China’s national security and damages China’s peaceful reunification”, He said.

The sale marks Obama’s most divisive act in China-US relations, after devoting his first year to broadening ties with Beijing despite discord on areas such as trade, human rights, Internet censorship and climate change.

ADVERTISEMENT

The United States since 1979 has recognized Beijing as China’s sole government. But Congress at the same time required the United States to sell Taiwan weapons for its self-defense.

Beijing argued again on Saturday that the arms sales violated the US commitment to Beijing’s “One China policy”.

Analysts said China this time could retaliate by refusing to support sanctions on Iran, a key US priority. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appealed to Beijing on Iran’s nuclear program in remarks in Paris hours before the Taiwan sale was announced.


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].

Send confidential news tips to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Trump’s racism is ‘disqualifying’ for him to remain as president: former White House lawyer

Published

on

Former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal explained on MSNBC on Thursday why he viewed President Donald Trump's racist attacks on four women of color in Congress as disqualifying.

Anchor Brian Williams read a quote from Susan Glasser of The New Yorker.

"Half of the country is appalled but not really sure how to combat him; the other half is cheering, or at least averting its gaze. This is what a political civil war looks like, with words, for now, as weapons," Glasser wrote.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Lawrence O’Donnell reports on the growing movement for the impeachment of President Donald Trump

Published

on

Anchor Lawrence O'Donnell reported on the growing movement for the impeachment of President Donald Trump during Thursday evening's "The Last Word" on MSNBC.

"The House of Representatives conducted a symbolic vote on a hastily written impeachment resolution by Democratic Congressman Al Green in reaction to the president’s tweeted comments that the House of Representatives voted to condemn as racist," O'Donnell reported. "The impeachment resolution had nothing to do with the [Robert] Mueller investigation and referred only to the president being unfit for office because of the language that he has used recently about members of Congress and immigrants and asylum seekers."

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Video proves how far the Trump’s GOP has gone from the era of Ronald Reagan and HW Bush

Published

on

The immigration policies of Donald Trump’s presidency would have no room for his GOP predecessors Ronald Reagan or George H.W. Bush—who both embraced work visas, family unification, easy border crossings and a better relationship with Mexico.

That counterpoint can be seen in a very short video clip from the 1980 presidential election where Reagan and Bush—who became Reagan’s vice president for two terms before winning the presidency in 1988—were asked about immigration at a campaign debate in Texas. Their responses show just how far to the right the Republican Party’s current leader, President Trump, and voters who have not left the GOP to become self-described political independents, have moved on immigration.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image