A lawsuit filed against investment bank Goldman Sachs by a shareholder alleges that the company spent more money on corporate bonuses than it earned in 2008.
Shareholder Ken Brown’s lawsuit is one of two suits filed against the company this week over its controversial decision to hand out billions of dollars in bonuses even after it was accused of playing a central role in the financial collapse of 2008 and receiving $10 billion in direct aid from the US government.
In his lawsuit (PDF), Brown states that Goldman Sachs gave out $4.82 billion in bonuses in 2008, despite earnings of only $2.32 billion that year. The lawsuit alleges that the company spent 259 percent of its income in the first quarter of 2009 on compensation.
Goldman Sachs handed out $16.7 billion in compensation in the first nine months of 2009, according to Bloomberg news service, and that figure may reach $22 billion for the entire year. Brown’s suit says the company typically sets aside 44 percent of its net revenue for employees.
“Payment of this exorbitant amount of compensation, which has little to do with Goldman Sachs’s performance, and was financed in large part with government bailout and taxpayer money, is a waste of the company’s assets and a breach of duty and loyalty,” Brown asserts in the suit.
Brown’s suit asks the court to order the company to return the bonus money to company coffers.
In another lawsuit, filed Thursday, an Illinois pension fund that is a Goldman shareholder demanded that Goldman return some of the compensation it has handed out since the financial collapse. The Central Laborers’ Pension Fund wants compensation for damages to shareholders from the company’s compensation spending.
The lawsuit contends that Goldman’s revenue for the year was artificially inflated by government bailouts of the banking industry and the insurer American International Group Inc, as well as a change in Goldman’s fiscal year.
Such sums, and Goldman’s practice of continuing to pay out nearly 50 percent of net revenue as compensation, show “scant regard” for the interests of shareholders, it said.ADVERTISEMENT
Both lawsuits “are completely without merit,” Goldman Sachs spokesman Michael DuVally told Bloomberg news.
Goldman Sachs has paid back the $10 billion it received in direct aid from taxpayers, meaning the company is not bound by government compensation limits. But the $10 billion figure doesn’t include the billions more the company received thanks to pressure by the Fed on insurance giant AIG to pay all of its debts to Goldman — and other AIG creditors — in full.
On Thursday, it was revealed that during the financial crisis, the New York Fed — then run by current Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner — tried to cover up its demand that AIG use taxpayers’ money to compensate Goldman Sachs.
Rachel Maddow gets to the bottom about why Trump ‘freaked out’ so much at report U.S. hacked Russia
MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow on Monday examined the motivations for President Donald Trump freaking out over the latest bombshell New York Times revelations about his Russia policy.
Maddow identified two key takeaways for her viewers.
"The weird things here are two things about the way the story has broken and both have to do with President Trump," she noted.
"The first really strange thing about the reaction is President Trump’s response to it online. This story apparently sort of made him flip out," she said, putting his Twitter reactions on screen.
‘To know Trump is to hate Trump’: biographer says that even ‘Ivanka despises him’
On Monday's edition of MSNBC's "All In," The Art of the Deal co-author Tony Schwartz told anchor Chris Hayes that President Donald Trump is so isolated at this point that even his eldest daughter can't stand him anymore.
"To know Trump is to hate Trump," said Schwartz. "Meaning everybody who knows him, deep down, hates him completely."
Trump campaign frantically announces new ‘polls’ to counter data that shows him losing — but there’s one problem
Frantically trying to contain the embarrassment after President Donald Trump fired his own internal pollsters for showing him trailing Democrats in key states he previously carried, the Trump campaign is now trying to claim that the bad polls are relying on old numbers and they have newer data that is much more favorable to the president.
But as CNN's Abby Phillip explained on Tuesday evening to anchor John Berman, there's a major problem with the new numbers — they aren't actually matching Trump up with Democrats.
"Despite what the president said publicly about this polling being fake, your sources tell a different story," said Berman.