Quantcast
Connect with us

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange granted bail

Published

on

Update: Swedish authorities will appeal decision

Swedish prosecutors will appeal a British decision to grant WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange bail, according to updates from sources outside the courtroom.

“This is really turning in to a show trial,” his attorney told reporters. “We will be in court in the next 48 hours, they haven’t given us the courtesy to say when. It is an unfortunate state of affairs, but given their history of persecuting of Mr Assange, it is perhaps not surprising.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Assange will remain in custody until there’s a ruling on the appeal.

A prior report follows

Just one day after winning the Time Magazine online poll for “Person of the Year,” Julian Assange, founder of the secrets outlet WikiLeaks, has been granted bail.

He had been sitting in a British prison pending extradition to Sweden on allegations of sexual assault not connected to WikiLeaks’ release of secret US State Department cables. His lawyers suggested the arrest was part of a larger plot to have Assange extradited to the US, where he may yet face espionage charges.

Though granted bail, Assange may not actually be freed on Tuesday, as it was already late afternoon when the ruling came down and prosecutors had time to appeal the decision. One of his supporters, Sarah Saunders, offered the court £150,000 — or “pretty much all I’m worth,” according to a reporter on the scene — to ensure Assange did not flee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Assange also received help from US filmmaker Michael Moore, who offered $20,000 for Assange’s bail. He called the WikiLeaks founder “a pioneer of free speech” and said he’d host their site on his own web servers if needed.

Bail was set at £240,000, according to the BBC. A total sum of £1 million had been offered by various donors hoping to secure his freedom.

Once the decision was announced, the courtroom erupted with cheers, according to The Guardian.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court required that Assange surrender his passport, report to police every day at 6 p.m., submit to a 10 p.m. curfew and wear a tracking device.

“Clearly, if the Swedish government opposes bail it will show there is some vindictiveness beyond this case,” British filmmaker Ken Loach told The Guardian. “It will show there is some political element that goes beyond the case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

GOP strategist: Assange ‘out there murdering individuals’

In an MSNBC live broadcast, a reporter suggested that “the whole of the world’s media” and a massive throng of supporters had gathered outside the courtroom, and that the scene was one of celebration.

But not everyone was happy. Republican strategist Boris Epshteyn, speaking to MSNBC, claimed that Assange was “out there murdering individuals.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s costing people’s lives and putting our people, our men and women in uniform, in harm’s way and I really despise him for that,” the former McCain adviser said.

“US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates admitted in a letter to the US congress that no sensitive intelligence sources or methods had been compromised by the Afghan war logs disclosure,” Assange wrote last week, in an editorial published the day he went to jail. “The Pentagon stated there was no evidence the WikiLeaks reports had led to anyone being harmed in Afghanistan. NATO in Kabul told CNN it couldn’t find a single person who needed protecting. The Australian Department of Defence said the same. No Australian troops or sources have been hurt by anything we have published.”

Award-winning journalist and documentarian John Pilger also told MSNBC, “there is no case against Julian Assange,” adding that it’s a “disgrace” for the British to keep him in solitary confinement for so long.

This video is from MSNBC’s Jansing & Co., broadcast Dec. 14, 2010.

ADVERTISEMENT



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

North Korea threatens to resume referring to Trump as a ‘dotard’

Published

on

North Korea has threatened to resume referring to US president Donald Trump as a "dotard", raising the prospect of a return to a war of words with a negotiating deadline approaching.

Pyongyang has set Washington an end-of-year time limit to offer it new concessions in deadlocked nuclear negotiations, and has said it will adopt an unspecified "new way" if nothing acceptable is forthcoming.

Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un -- whose countries and their allies fought each other to a standstill in the 1950-53 Korean War -- engaged in mutual insults and threats of devastation in 2017, sending tensions soaring before a diplomatic rapprochement the following year.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

What would the GOP do if Trump actually shot someone? A former government ethics chief explains

Published

on

Former director of government ethics, Walter Shaub

President Donald Trump infamously said in 2016 that his supporters were so loyal that he could shoot someone in broad daylight and not lose any support.

Walter Shaub, who served as chief of the Government Ethics Office under former President Barack Obama, hilariously imagined how elected Republicans would react if Trump actually did shoot someone on 5th Avenue.

"It was indecorous of the president to shoot someone on Fifth Avenue," Shaub said, imagining a scripted GOP response. "I would have preferred he not do that. In the strongest possible terms, I add that I find it to be generally inconsistent with the higher aims of responsible governance. And you can quote me on that."

Continue Reading
 

Commentary

Trump will survive impeachment — but will never truly recover from the deep wounds it inflicts

Published

on

After deliberating with the members of her caucus and reading the House Select Committee on Intelligence report on the Ukraine bribery scandal, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced on Thursday morning that she has directed the chairs of the Judiciary, Intelligence, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services and Ways and Means committees to begin writing articles of impeachment against President Trump.

This article was originally published at Salon

Her speech was quite moving, offering up pertinent quotes from the founders and laying out her reasoning for going ahead after having been notably reluctant to do so.

Continue Reading