Quantcast
Connect with us

New Rumsfeld documents highlight Gingrich’s involvement with Iraq War

Published

on

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) might have been persona non grata in certain Republican circles early in the aughts after he resigned the Speakership, divorced his wife and married a much-younger aide, but he was more than welcome in the Pentagon under then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Documents released Monday by Rumsfeld, quaintly called “snowflakes” to highlight their abbreviated nature, show that Gingrich was in on more than just the Bush Administration’s Iraq War planning.

ADVERTISEMENT

In one to Gingrich directly in April 2001, Rumsfeld encouraged the Pentagon “consultant” to read a memo by William “Bill” Schneider pushing for the idea of fewer Congressional hearings featuring major Administration officials in favor of more contacts between executive branch and Congressional staffers. Rumsfeld told Gingrich, “It is thoughtful and helpful,
may give you some ideas as you fashion a plan,” adding “Bill Schneider might be someone you want to talk to and get his thoughts firsthand. He is really smart.”

Later that year, Gingrich joined the Defense Policy Board at the Pentagon where, in the days after September 11, 2001, Gingrich and his colleagues met for 19 hours to discuss what to do about the attack. As the New York Times reported, the members of that meeting agreed to attack Iraq as soon as the initial phase of the war with Afghanistan was over. Gingrich said in an interview at the time, ”If we don’t use this as the moment to replace Saddam after we replace the Taliban, we are setting the stage for disaster.” In a speech around the same time, Gingrich told an audience at the American Enterprise Institute, “We have to talk about replacement, not about punishment” of Hussein.

In another memo from March 19, 2002, Rumsfeld made a series of recommendations to then-Army Gen. William F. Kernan, commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, who was in charge of the $250 million Millennium Challenge, a a joint war-fighting, experimental exercise involving both live field forces and computer simulations. He suggested to the General that speaking with Gingrich — who never served in the military — might be “helpful” as One other individual who might be helpful as, he said, Gingrich “has been working with me on transformation.”

One of Kernan’s colleagues in the war games, Marine Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper, who commanded the “bad guys,” later told the Army Times that the games were rigged for the opposition forces to lose. The Joint Forces Command denied his assertions.

Gingrich, under his moniker as Pentagon consultant and his position on the Board, also made several trips to the CIA in the run-up to the Iraq war, either at the behest of Cheney or Rumsfeld. In the June-July 2003 issue of Foreign Policy, Gingrich then claimed that the real problem with the Iraq war intelligence was the State Department, asking, “Can anyone imagine a State Department more out of sync with Bush’s views and objectives?”

ADVERTISEMENT

In May 2003, when Gingrich was writing, 79 percent of Americans thought that war was justified. By August 2004, two-thirds believed we went to war based on faulty assumptions — i.e., the intelligence that Gringrich wanted but didn’t get from State (and got from the CIA).

In a CNN/Opinion Research Corporate Poll from January 2011, just before the hawkish Gingrich launched his Presidential bid, 67 percent of Americans opposed the Iraq war altogether. Whether they’ll nonetheless elect one of its architects and biggest cheerleaders, however, remains to be seen.

[Image via Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons licensed]

ADVERTISEMENT

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump knew how bad COVID-19 was in January — but called it ‘good’ because he could avoid shaking ‘disgusting’ voters’ hands: ex-Pence aide

Published

on

Olivia Troye, a former White House aide who worked for Vice President Mike Pence's office, is sounding off with more details about the Trump administration's early knowledge about the severity of the coronavirus.

Troye appeared on "The Today Show" on Tuesday where she discussed the weeks leading up to the World Health Organization declaring the coronavirus a global pandemic. Although Pence and President Donald Trump have repeatedly claimed they had no way of knowing how bad the pandemic could be, Troye suggests otherwise, reports The Hill.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Completely shameless’: Pompeo faces backlash for violating his own guidelines on political activity

Published

on

President Donald Trump's secretary of state has been increasingly "brazen" about appearing at political events, in apparent violation of his own directive to the department's employees.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo wanted to accept the president's invitation last year to speak at a campaign rally, but a congressional aide said he backed down after being told that would violate existing rules, reported Politico.

However, that's all changed this year.

“What he is doing is entirely unconventional,” said Harry Kopp, an author of books on U.S. diplomacy. “The employees of the State Department have, by now, I think, no illusions about the partisan nature of their secretary of state.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trainer for anti-COVID lockdown group caught on camera telling supporters how to break the law

Published

on

A signature-gathering trainer for a Michigan group working to overturn Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's pandemic restrictions has been caught on camera advising the group's supporters on how to break the law.

The Detroit Free Press, which obtained a copy of the video, reports that trainer Erik Tisinger instructed supporters for Unlock Michigan in assorted nefarious practices for illegally collecting signatures.

Among other things, Tisinger told Unlock Michigan backers that it is "super easy" to give misleading answers under oath if they're compelled to testify by a court of law about their activities; that they could leave copies of their petitions with store clerks to collect signatures even though getting signatures without properly witnessing them would be illegal; and that they could trespass on private property to collect signatures even without business owners' permission.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE