Quantcast
Connect with us

Harvard economist: Legalize all drugs to fight corruption

Published

on

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron (pictured, left), a leading intellectual force in the drug policy reform movement, sees the black market for illegal drugs purely as a creation of American economic policy — and by definition, the black market corrupts.

“The main reason there’s so much [illegal traffic between] Mexico into the United States is because it’s illegal to produce, transport, distribute and advertise those goods here,” he explained to Raw Story recently. “The U.S. prohibition of drugs means that drugs markets are underground. They’re produced in black markets, rather than produced in standard, above ground markets.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Those markets, he warned, tend to be a little rougher around the edges than your traditional Sunday afternoon shopping market.

“Black markets tend to have a number of features that above ground markets don’t have,” Miron said. “They are affected far, far more by violence, by corruption, by quality control and some other related issues that result from the illegality of the market — and almost entirely because of the illegality, not because of the nature of the particular substances being prohibited.”

That’s why he led a group of more than 500 economists — three of them Nobel laureates, including Milton Friedman — to petition policy makers in 2005 for a new way forward in the drug war. They all signed onto Miron’s economic analysis of the costs associated with drug prohibition and agreed with his conclusions: namely, that legalizing marijuana would save the government $7.7 billion per year, and earn an additional $6.2 billion in annual tax revenues.

They even hedged their bets, keeping up with professional appearances: “The fact that marijuana prohibition has these budgetary impacts does not by itself mean prohibition is bad policy,” the analysis notes. “Existing evidence, however, suggests prohibition has minimal benefits and may itself cause substantial harm.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Miron has since become even more outspoken about the negative effects of black markets and his personal feelings on the drug war.

“If the U.S. were to legalize drugs, you would see a decline in the prices at which they’re sold, to some degree,” he told Raw Story. “The prices are highly elevated because of the extra costs posed by the black market. Those declines in the prices might contribute to increased consumption, although it doesn’t follow that the increase in consumption would be huge. Many people who consume substances are already consuming them.”

Miron added: “At the same time, you would get substantial if not complete reduction of many of the effects of having the trade be in a black market. We would be getting rid of violence that occurs between rival drug traffickers, you would reduce the incentives for corruption of police, judges, prosecutors and so on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“You would see the quality of what people get, their ability to purchase something of a known purity that is not adulterated with potentially dangerous other materials, you’d see that essentially eliminated, just as it is with most legal markets and most legal commodities. So, the negative effects associated with drug markets would substantially disappear if the market were to be made legal.”

For those reasons, Miron said he strongly believes that, moreso than just regulating marijuana, “I think we should legalize all currently illegal drugs.”

“The effects of prohibition on the drug market are mainly to drive that market underground. There may be some effect of prohibition in reducing the overall size of the market for how much gets produced and consumed, but that is a relatively small effect. The main effect is that… all this black market activity leads to crime and corruption, and especially to elevated rates of violence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Photo: Shutterstock.com, all rights reserved.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Police officer sues Ava Duvernay for depiction of interrogation technique used on the Central Park Five

Published

on

On Monday, TMZ reported that former police officer John Reid is suing director Ava Duvernay over her depiction of the "Reid Technique" used against the young, Black suspects known as the Central Park Five in the Netflix film "When They See Us."

Reid is claiming defamation, insisting that the film's depiction of his methods are wrong.

"You squeezed statements out of them after 42 hours of questioning and coercing, without food, bathroom breaks, withholding parental supervision," said a prosecution staffer to a detective in the movie. "The Reid Technique has been universally rejected. That's truth to you."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

National Enquirer and AMI shredded ‘sensitive Trump-related documents’ hidden in a safe right before he was elected: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump's foreign election interference in the 2020 election may soon be eclipsed by his a renewed focus into his 2016 campaign after a bombshell revelation in a new book by journalist Ronan Farrow.

"American Media, Inc. and the National Enquirer shredded sensitive Donald Trump-related documents that had been held in a top-secret safe right before Trump was elected in 2016, according to fresh allegations made in a new book by journalist Ronan Farrow," Politico reported Monday.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Giuliani demands investigation of Ambassador Yovanovitch — but can’t even spell her name

Published

on

Rudy Giuliani on Monday demanded an investigation into former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch -- who had spent the day testifying before Congress.

Giuliani made the statement while retweeting a conspiracy theory by Tom Fitton of the far-right group Judicial Watch:

"No wonder [Trump] and President Zelensky of Ukraine agreed Ambassador Yonacovitch (sic) was a real problem," Giuliani said, while misspelling Yovanovitch's name.

"I wonder if Shiftless asked her about this? Will there be an investigation or is she another 'Protected Person' like Biden & Hillary," Giuliani tweeted.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image