Quantcast
Connect with us

Harvard economist: Legalize all drugs to fight corruption

Published

on

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron (pictured, left), a leading intellectual force in the drug policy reform movement, sees the black market for illegal drugs purely as a creation of American economic policy — and by definition, the black market corrupts.

“The main reason there’s so much [illegal traffic between] Mexico into the United States is because it’s illegal to produce, transport, distribute and advertise those goods here,” he explained to Raw Story recently. “The U.S. prohibition of drugs means that drugs markets are underground. They’re produced in black markets, rather than produced in standard, above ground markets.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Those markets, he warned, tend to be a little rougher around the edges than your traditional Sunday afternoon shopping market.

“Black markets tend to have a number of features that above ground markets don’t have,” Miron said. “They are affected far, far more by violence, by corruption, by quality control and some other related issues that result from the illegality of the market — and almost entirely because of the illegality, not because of the nature of the particular substances being prohibited.”

That’s why he led a group of more than 500 economists — three of them Nobel laureates, including Milton Friedman — to petition policy makers in 2005 for a new way forward in the drug war. They all signed onto Miron’s economic analysis of the costs associated with drug prohibition and agreed with his conclusions: namely, that legalizing marijuana would save the government $7.7 billion per year, and earn an additional $6.2 billion in annual tax revenues.

They even hedged their bets, keeping up with professional appearances: “The fact that marijuana prohibition has these budgetary impacts does not by itself mean prohibition is bad policy,” the analysis notes. “Existing evidence, however, suggests prohibition has minimal benefits and may itself cause substantial harm.”

Miron has since become even more outspoken about the negative effects of black markets and his personal feelings on the drug war.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If the U.S. were to legalize drugs, you would see a decline in the prices at which they’re sold, to some degree,” he told Raw Story. “The prices are highly elevated because of the extra costs posed by the black market. Those declines in the prices might contribute to increased consumption, although it doesn’t follow that the increase in consumption would be huge. Many people who consume substances are already consuming them.”

Miron added: “At the same time, you would get substantial if not complete reduction of many of the effects of having the trade be in a black market. We would be getting rid of violence that occurs between rival drug traffickers, you would reduce the incentives for corruption of police, judges, prosecutors and so on.”

“You would see the quality of what people get, their ability to purchase something of a known purity that is not adulterated with potentially dangerous other materials, you’d see that essentially eliminated, just as it is with most legal markets and most legal commodities. So, the negative effects associated with drug markets would substantially disappear if the market were to be made legal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For those reasons, Miron said he strongly believes that, moreso than just regulating marijuana, “I think we should legalize all currently illegal drugs.”

“The effects of prohibition on the drug market are mainly to drive that market underground. There may be some effect of prohibition in reducing the overall size of the market for how much gets produced and consumed, but that is a relatively small effect. The main effect is that… all this black market activity leads to crime and corruption, and especially to elevated rates of violence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Photo: Shutterstock.com, all rights reserved.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Deputy national security adviser accused by White House officials of being ‘Anonymous’ may be reassigned

Published

on

According to a new report from Axios, there's a discussion amongst top Trump officials about reassigning deputy national security adviser Victoria Coates to the Department of Energy from the National Security Council. Coates has been the target of some inside the White House who accuse her of being behind an op-ed in the New York Times -- and later a bestselling book -- which chronicled a resistance movement inside the Trump administration.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ex-Obama adviser offers three essential tips for any Democrat who wants to beat Trump

Published

on

Dan Pfeiffer, a former adviser to President Barack Obama and current host of the "Pod Save America" podcast, has written a piece in Politico that offers three essential tips for whomever the Democratic Party nominates as its candidate for president.

In particular, Pfeiffer looks at the major mistakes that Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) made when he ran against Obama in 2012, and which allowed Obama to win quite handily despite being stuck with an unemployment rate of 8 percent.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

White House advisers fear Trump’s passive approach to China is making the coronavirus worse

Published

on

President Donald Trump has already expended all of his political capital with China over his trade war and he is unwilling to pressure the country now that the coronavirus is getting closer and closer to pandemic status.

"U.S. health officials have been signaling for nearly two weeks now that a coronavirus pandemic may be on the horizon," wrote infectious diseases reporter Helen Branswell for STAT. "While stressing that the virus presents only a 'low risk' to Americans right now, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, acknowledged Tuesday that that might not remain the case for long."

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image