Quantcast
Connect with us

Study: ISP data caps only serve to increase company profits

Published

on

Bandwidth caps implemented by major American Internet service providers (ISPs) in recent years don’t actually help networks deliver reliable service and instead only serve to inflate company profits, a study published Monday found.

“Internet service and mobile providers appear to be one of the few industries that seek to discourage their customers from consuming more of their product,” The New America Foundation’s study stated. “The reason for this counterintuitive business model is that in the noncompetitive US marketplace, it is highly profitable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The study found that as the subscriber-base for companies like AT&T, Comcast and Charter has expanded, the cost for data delivery has hit record lows. Meanwhile, about 64 percent percent of American Internet subscribers are now on bandwidth-limited plans.

Companies that implemented such policies have without exception told customers that they’re intended to head off network congestion ostensibly caused by heavy Internet users. Most caps, however, allow the user to purchase more bandwidth for a fee, as if it were a tangible object instead of a continuous service.

But even Comcast itself, the study notes, admitted in a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that its bandwidth caps “does not address the issue of network congestion.”

“Some estimate that cable broadband providers enjoy gross margins as high as 95 percent, an exceptionally high rate of revenue relative to the supposed costs associated with offering the service,” the study explains. “For these companies, selling broadband packages even to the heaviest users is still quite profitable.”

Critics of the caps often suggest that they’re designed to both inflate profits and impede competition in an increasingly consolidated marketplace, particular when it comes to video delivery.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Law professor Susan Crawford sums up the problems of the residential broadband marketplace, observing ‘the cable operators have a built in, giant conflict of interest,'” the study noted. “‘They want to make sure that only their own premium video products are successful, and they can twist all the dials to make sure that happens.'”
——

Photo: Shutterstock.com, all rights reserved.

(H/T: Ars Technica)

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

REVEALED: Bolton urged House Dems to investigate Ukraine ambassador’s firing two days before impeachment launched

Published

on

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) blew up President Donald Trump's claims that John Bolton kept his concerns about Ukraine to himself.

The New York Democrat, who chairs the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, revealed Wednesday that Bolton urged him "unprompted" in September to look into the ousting of former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

Why didn’t John Bolton complain about this “nonsense” a long time ago, when he was very publicly terminated. He said, not that it matters, NOTHING!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 29, 2020

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Lindsey Graham quickly scuttles press conference after being linked to Ukraine scheme

Published

on

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) did not appear at a Wednesday press conference after reports linked him to a highly-controversial Ukraine scheme.

According to The Daily Beast, President Donald Trump's attorney, Rudy Giuliani, provided Graham with a letter lobbying for sanctions on Ukrainian officials. The letter was obtained through Giuliani associate Lev Parnas.

Fox News reported on Wednesday morning that Graham was expected at a press conference -- but the senator never showed.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump White House sends formal threat to John Bolton — and warns him not to publish his book: CNN

Published

on

CNN is reporting that the Trump White House has sent a formal threat to former national security adviser John Bolton aimed at blocking the publication of his upcoming tell-all book about his time working for the president.

The threat against Bolton marks an escalation for the Trump White House, which has resisted allowing Bolton to testify in the president's Senate impeachment trial. The president himself attacked Bolton in a tweet on Wednesday morning, and claimed that he fired him as national security adviser because he wanted to start "World War Six."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image