Quantcast
Connect with us

Connecticut governor: Definition of assault weapons ‘was lobbied to death’

Published

on

In a discussion of how Vice President Joe Biden has taken a lead role in the push for gun control, Chris Hayes reminded viewers that the former senator spearheaded the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which included the now-expired assault weapons ban.

Gov. Dannel Malloy (D-CT) said that under the 1994 law, very large magazines were not legal, although it was “too broad” when it came to the definition of an assault weapon.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to the U.S. Conference of Mayors on Thursday, Biden said, “High capacity magazines don’t have a practical sporting purpose or hunting purpose. As one hunter told me, if you’ve got twelve rounds, if you’ve got twelve rounds, it means you’ve already missed the deer eleven times. You should pack the sucker in at that point.”

In 1994, Hayes said, many debated how to define assault weapons, “and I think, in retrospect, there was a lot about that that was quite porous, right?”

Mallow said that “people, interests, have worked on a definition that is wide enough to drive a truck through. And so, you know, it has to look like this and have one or two or three or four similarities with a military instrument. It’s really what most states have gone to that have even tried to do it on their own. And it’s just too wide, too broad.”

“The definition was lobbied to death,” he said later.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hayes said of the AR-15, which was used in Newtown, “versions of that did exist in the assault weapon ban and other versions didn’t. It was sort of modified to fit in under.”

Neera Tanden, president of the progressive Center for American Progress, said that studies have shown that “when we had the assault weapons ban, the number of guns that were recovered from criminals that had assault weapon features were declining. It took a little while because it grandfathered a lot of ammunitions in, but it actually was effective.”

Malloy said he recently spoke with an older Texas mayor who said that when he was growing up, his family had a gun that held five shots — but two of those had to be sealed because of tougher gun laws.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jen Psaki, former White House deputy communications director, said one of the major Republican arguments against an assault weapons ban is the difficulty in defining what an assault weapon is, an argument that she said some people can “fall prey to.” People who “want this to happen need to, you know, watch out for that.”

There has been much debate regarding whether the ban was effective. A 2004 study conducted by the Department of Justice was inconclusive: “Because the ban has not yet reduced the use of LCMs [large capacity magazines] in crime, we cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence. However, the ban’s exemption of millions of pre-ban AWs and LCMs ensured that the effects of the law would occur only gradually. Those effects are still unfolding and may not be fully felt for several years into the future, particularly if foreign, pre-ban LCMs continue to be imported into the U.S. in large numbers,” it read.

Sam Wang, a professor at Princeton University, analyzed deaths from mass shootings and found that deaths from such events almost tripled after the ban expired, while the number of shooting incidents almost doubled. However, the number of such gun deaths before the ban were did not differ substantially. Mass killings, he wrote, “are always with us, but advanced weaponry creates an efficiency of scale to allow the possibility of large killings.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video, via MSNBC, below.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

CNN lays out damning timeline of Trump and Giuliani’s calls to Ukraine seeking dirt on Biden

Published

on

Following Rudy Giuliani's extraordinary appearance on CNN on Thursday night, where he may have admitted the commission of a crime, the hosts of CNN's "New Day" compiled a timeline linking the approximate date of Trump's phone call that was flagged by a whistleblower to subsequent events involving Ukraine.

According to the timeline, presented by hosts John Berman and Alisyn Camerota, Trump spoke with the president of Ukraine on July 25, with Giuliani meeting with him later that month.

What followed was the August 12 whistleblower complaint and then Trump blocking aide to Ukraine by the end of the month.

Continue Reading

Facebook

‘Game changer’: Morning Joe panel nails Giuliani’s confessional outburst as evidence for Trump impeachment

Published

on

Panelists on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" agreed President Donald Trump's phone call to Ukraine's president should be a "game changer" -- and was clearly "impeachable."

The July 25 call appears to have triggered a complaint from a whistleblower, after the president allegedly offered military and financial aid to Ukraine in exchange for pursuing an investigation into Joe Biden's son doing business there.

"It does feel like a moment in time," said MSNBC's Donny Deutsch. "We've sat on this set after so many Trump's snafus and this is it -- this is a game changer. If the Democrats can't smell this. I've been going all along, step away from impeachment because when it's a process thing, when it's campaign finance, this is the big one. If this is the case, this is the Super Bowl, and the Democrats need to pounce aggressively."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Watch Rudy Giuliani’s stunning confession that he has been pressuring Ukraine officials for dirt on Biden

Published

on

Attorney for the president Rudy Giuliani gave a combative, belligerent and downright incoherent interview on CNN Thursday evening, raving about a ballooning scandal involving Donald Trump and Ukraine.

Giuliani and Trump have apparently been pressuring the country to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a probe that could help the president’s re-election campaign. That massive scandal had been unfurling on its own for months, but it blew up Thursday when multiple reports revealed that a mysteriously suppressed whistleblower complaint in the intelligence community reportedly concerns Trump’s conduct and the country of Ukraine.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image