Quantcast
Connect with us

Sen. Rand Paul: I’ll end filibuster once Obama says no to drone strikes in the U.S.

Published

on

Republican Rand Paul stiff-armed President Barack Obama’s CIA nomination Wednesday, drawing support from fellow senators concerned about the administration’s refusal to rule out drone strikes on US soil.

With the blocking tactic stretching into it’s sixth hour, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tried to bring Paul’s filibuster to a close, but the freshman from Kentucky refused, continuing his hold on any Senate action as he railed against US policy on targeted killings.

ADVERTISEMENT

Paul said he would be happy to yield “if the president or the attorney general will clarify that they are not going to kill non-combatants in America.”

The drone issue gained fresh currency on Capitol Hill with senators from both parties pressing US Attorney General Eric Holder on whether the administration believes such drone attacks could be justified.

Paul began by saying he will “speak until I can no longer speak,” and demanding answers from President Barack Obama on the secret unmanned aerial drone program that has emerged as the most contentious element of John Brennan’s nomination to head the spy agency.

“I will speak as long as it takes until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone, on American soil, without first being charged with a crime, without first being found guilty by a court,” Paul said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brennan’s nomination easily cleared the Senate Intelligence Committee Tuesday despite Republican concerns about lack of White House transparency on last year’s attack in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans.

The Senate Democratic leadership wanted to move this week on a confirmation vote for Brennan.

But Paul was making the Senate leadership sweat a little. By the filibuster’s third hour, he enlisted Republicans including Mike Lee, Ted Cruz and Saxby Chambliss. By hour four Marco Rubio joined in, as did Democrat Ron Wyden, who has long questioned White House power on national security issues.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think you are raising some of the most important questions… we could be asking,” Wyden said, without causing Paul to yield control of the floor.

“This is just the beginning of this debate.”

Paul had threatened to filibuster Brennan’s nomination as early February 13, when he demanded answers from the administration about the president’s power to authorize lethal force.

ADVERTISEMENT

Holder responded Tuesday, stressing that while Obama had “no intention” of ordering drone strikes on US soil, the scenario could be possible if there was an “extraordinary circumstance” such as an attack similar to 9/11.

Paul reacted with revulsion.

“When I asked the president, can you kill an American on American soil, it should have been an easy answer…. It should have been a resounding and unequivocal ‘no,'” Paul said Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The president’s response? He hasn’t killed anyone yet.”

“Is that enough? Are we satisfied by that?” Paul asked.

And he insisted that his critique was not partisan. “Were this a Republican president, I’d be here saying exactly the same thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Paul acknowledged that US drone strikes have proved effective in places like Pakistan and Yemen, including a strike on US-born radical preacher Anwar al-Awlaki, whom Paul branded a traitor.

But “if you’re going to kill non-combatants, people eating dinner, in America, there have to be some rules.”

Paul began his filibuster at 11:47 am (1637 GMT), and he was going strong more than six hours later, recalling the classic “talking filibusters” of old.

ADVERTISEMENT

But he acknowledged Brennan was a virtual lock for the CIA, calling the filibuster “a blip” in the process.

The ultimate goal, he said, was to get Obama to “say explicitly that non-combatants in America would not be killed by drones.”

The issue became the focal point at a Wednesday hearing where Republican Cruz confronted Holder about drones.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cruz asked Holder whether the Constitution would allow a drone strike on someone sitting at a cafe “if that individual is not posing an imminent and immediate threat of death or bodily harm.”

Holder said “I would not think that that would be an appropriate use of any kind of lethal force.”

That prompted a fierce response from Cruz, who said it was “remarkable” that the administration could not state unequivocally that such a strike would not be legally allowed.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

If Republicans oppose Trump they can help prove any support of the president is phony: Conservative

Published

on

In a scathing column Wednesday, conservative writer Jennifer Rubin explained that one of the best ways Republicans can help what's left of the GOP is by opposing Trump to prove support for him is a lie.

A report in The Washington Post revealed some "Never Trump" Republicans are thinking of running against the president, even if they have no chance in winning.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump officials abruptly call off Midwest agriculture tour amid rising tensions with farmers

Published

on

President Donald Trump's officials were abruptly told to end their agricultural tour in the Midwest this week as tensions among farmers continue to rise.

Bloomberg News reported Trump administration officials were visiting farmers in the Midwest when they received a credible threat that prompted them to end their tour. The Pro Farmer Midwest Crop Tour was taking a look at soybeans and corn with Department of Agriculture staff when they were forced to pull out of the area.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump promoting himself as the ‘second coming of God’ is another sign of his lack of basic mental capacity: Yale psychiatrist

Published

on

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump retweeted an anti-Semitic super-fan who compared Trump to the "second coming of God." That was after he made comments Tuesday suggesting that Jews who vote for Democrats are traitorous to Israel. The comments come after a long summer of Trump accusing members of the Squad of being anti-Semitic and suggesting that the Clintons are responsible for disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's death in jail.

Raw Story spoke with Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a forensic psychiatrist and violence expert at Yale School of Medicine, about the president's fitness for office. Lee helped launch a public health approach to global violence prevention as a consultant to the World Health Organization and other United Nations bodies since 2002. She authored the textbook, “Violence: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Causes, Consequences, and Cures,” which shows how the dangerous psychology of individuals is connected to dangerous societies and cultures, including their politics and economics. She and several coauthors of the public-service book, “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President,” prepared a mental health analysis of the president using information in the Mueller report (dangerouscase.org).

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image