Quantcast
Connect with us

Catholic midwives win right to refuse to aid abortions in Scotland

Published

on

Scottish court of appeal permits conscientious objection ‘to the whole process of treatment’ in terminations

Two Roman Catholic midwives have won the right to refuse to help with any abortion procedures or planning after an appeal court ruling in Scotland.

Judges in Edinburgh ruled that Mary Doogan, 58, and Concepta Wood, 52, who worked as labour ward co-ordinators in Glasgow, had a legal right to consciously object to helping with abortions in any way.

The ruling, which could be appealed against by Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board, may have wide ramifications for the NHS and other health staff who oppose abortions on religious grounds.

The midwives, practising Catholics, had lost a previous case against the board after a judge ruled that working on ward planning or delegating staff did not involve actually carrying out abortions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Giving judgment in a judicial review last year, Lady Smith said: “Nothing they have to do as part of their duties terminates a woman’s pregnancy.

“They are sufficiently removed from direct involvement as, it seems to me, to afford appropriate respect for and accommodation of their beliefs.”

But the appeal court in Edinburgh on Wednesday overturned that ruling and said the Abortion Act 1967 gave medical staff wide-ranging protection against taking part in abortions on religious and conscience grounds.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lady Dorrian, sitting with Lord Mackay of Drumadoon and Lord McEwan, said: “In our view the right of conscientious objection extends not only to the actual medical or surgical termination but to the whole process of treatment given for that purpose.”

The midwives’ lawyer, Gerry Moynihan QC, had said it was up to staff rather than their managers to decide what was morally or ethically objectionable to them. Their employers were saying that their administrative convenience over-rode the midwives’ right to conscience, he argued.

Moynihan said the right to object covered all their duties, with the exception of helping in life-saving treatments. There was clear legal authority that the right to conscientious objection extended to all the staff involved in preparing or planning for a procedure, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The administrative convenience of the health board is irrelevant because the right is a balance between facilitating abortion while respecting the genuine conscientious objection of medical, nursing and ancillary staff,” he told the court.

The health board said it was deciding its next step but would not comment further: “We note the outcome of the appeal and will be considering our options with our legal advisers over the next few days.”

The most senior Catholic in Glasgow, Archbishop Philip Tartaglia, who is also president of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland, said the appeal ruling was “a victory for freedom of conscience and for common sense”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commending the women on their courage, Tartaglia said he hoped other anti-abortion health workers would take their lead.

“As the judges state, the right of conscientious objection extends not only to the actual medical or surgical termination but to the whole abortion process,” the archbishop said.

“I hope that many pro-life health professionals will take heart from this judgment and have the courage to express their own objections if and when they are asked to carry out tasks which are morally wrong and violate their conscience.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Respect for workers’ freedom of conscience is a hallmark of a civilised society.”

Dr David Jones, director of the Catholic Anscombe Bioethics Centre, said the appeal court ruling could have widespread implications for the whole medical profession and could influence other disputes about the limits to religious conscience, including the right to wear a cross, if it was upheld.

He said it contradicted the General Medical Council’s latest guidance for Britain’s doctors, which came into force on Monday and said rights to conscientious objection were limited to “refusal to participate in the procedure itself”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This pushes substantially the other way,” Jones said. “Once we see if it is upheld on appeal or not appealed, we will see if it sets a precedent: this is a significant judgment which sends a signal which is much bigger than the case itself.”

Responding to Jones’s comments, Niall Dickson, the GMC’s chief executive, said it would need to consider the implications of the judges’ decision on its guidance. “We will study the outcome of this ruling, which has just come out, to see if there are any implications for our guidance. We already have clear guidance which says that doctors should be open with employers and colleagues so they can practise in accordance with their beliefs without compromising patient care,” Dickson said.

Gillian Smith, director for Scotland of the Royal College of Midwives, said it wanted to see where this case finally ended before taking a view. “This is a very interesting decision, we will wait and see if there is a further judgment in relation to this complex case. The RCM position has always been and will remain that we support women’s choice within the law,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

© Guardian News and Media 2013


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Longtime Trump loyalist warns the president that his racist tweets are about to permanently stain his image

Published

on

On Tuesday, former Trump administration official Anthony Scaramucci criticized President Trump for telling four freshman congresswomen to go back to their own countries. All four are American citizens.

Scaramucci accused the president of playing to his base, in a way that has dangerous manifestations: for the president and the country.

“He’s blowing very hard on a dog-whistle that every ethnic group that’s landed in the United States has had to hear,” Scaramucci told the BBC.

“I don’t think the president is a racist, but here’s the thing: if you continue to say and act in that manner, then we all have to look at him and say, ‘OK, well, maybe you weren’t a racist, but now you’re turning into one.'”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ted Cruz defends Trump by comparing him to Twitter trolls who tell him to go back to Canada

Published

on

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Tuesday issued an unusual defense of President Donald Trump's racist remarks against four Democratic congresswomen by comparing the president to an internet troll.

According to Politico reporter Burgess Everett, Cruz deflected criticism of Trump's racist tweets against Reps. Rashiba Tlaib (D-MI), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) by arguing that "lefties on Twitter every day" tell him to "go back" to Canada, where he was born in 1970.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Senators press Facebook on ‘trust’ in hearing on digital currency

Published

on

US senators Tuesday questioned whether Facebook can be trusted with a massive financial responsibility at the first public hearing on its plan for a global digital currency called Libra.

The lawmakers added to criticism of the plan unveiled by Facebook last month with two dozen partners on the digital coin, touted as a way to lower costs and facilitate cross-border money transfers.

David Marcus, Facebook's executive heading the digital coin effort, defended the plan during more than two hours at a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Libra, pledging to comply with all regulations to thwart money laundering and criminal activity.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

close-image