Quantcast
Connect with us

Rochester University pressured to fire professor Steven Landsburg over rape comments

Published

on

A professor at the University of Rochester who asked why an attacker shouldn’t “reap the benefits” of an unconscious woman is now the target of a campaign to get him fired.

In a March 20 blog post, economics professor Steven Landsburg questioned why raping someone who was unconscious should be illegal if the act caused no direct physical harm. The question was posed along with two other hypothetical questions about pornography and environmentalism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Landsburg noted the Steubenville rape victim “was not even aware that she’d been sexually assaulted until she learned about it from the Internet some days later,” and added that as long as someone was unaware of the assault, “why shouldn’t the rest of the world (or more specifically my attackers) be allowed to reap the benefits?”

The group Women Organized to Resist and Defend has launched an online campaign to get Landsburg fired for his comments. The group describes his blog post as a “shocking” attempt “to normalize and minimize the effects of rape.”

In a follow-up post published on Wednesday, Landsburg insisted his question was merely a hypothetical thought experiment, which was meant to provoke discussion about what sort of “psychic harm” should be acknowledged in policy. He described his question as “more idle noodling than anything else, with no good arguments and no conclusions.”

Landsburg found himself facing another backlash last year for comments directed at Georgetown student Sandra Fluke. After conservative radio show host Rush Limbaugh called Fluke a “slut,” the professor wrote that a “far better word might have been ‘prostitute.'”

“She will, as I understand it, be having sex whether she gets paid or not,” Landsburg added. “Her demand is to be paid. The right word for that is something much closer to ‘extortionist’.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

The ‘freedom’ America’s billionaires are selling is literally killing us

Published

on

America’s rightwing billionaires comfortably hang out on their massive estates, giving instant Covid tests to their live-in servants, while using the word “freedom“ to describe their lifestyle in the rightwing media they own or support.

The headline yesterday over at NewsMax reads, “No Masking Biden’s Disdain For Freedom” and one at RedState references “Covid Tyranny.”

Wealthy right wingers have been telling us this sort of thing for years: that “socialist“ programs and regulations that help or protect average people diminish America’s freedom.

Freedom Works and their followers in the Tea Party argued that Obamacare and Medicare destroyed American’s “freedom” to choose not to have healthcare or get any support or benefits from the government when they get sick.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

There’s ‘no strategy’ to Trump’s efforts to sow confusion — but it’s working: The View co-hosts

Published

on

President Donald Trump's legal challenges to his election loss aren't succeeding in court, but one of the co-hosts on "The View" admitted it had worked on her.

The president fired Homeland Security official Chris Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, who disputed the president's claims about election security.

"I guess I keep thinking, you know, Jan. 20, that changes anyway, he could be hired back," said co-host Sara Haines. "This isn't 'The Apprentice.' Trump doesn't get the final word on who is fired, but I also find Trump hard to follow because in response to this firing, he said that the only thing secure about our 2020 election was that it was virtually impenetrable by foreign powers. On that, the Trump administration takes great credit."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani — and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

Published

on

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

"The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED," the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly "threatening" phone call.

Continue Reading