Quantcast
Connect with us

With purchase of Oculus Rift, Facebook pushes towards a virtual reality future

Published

on

It is a decades-old promise that looked most likely to be realised in fiction rather than fact. Now, though, virtual reality might finally reach the mainstream after Facebook spent $2bn (£1.2bn) to buy a manufacturer of futuristic headsets that take control of a person’s field of vision.

Late on Tuesday night, Facebook founder – and chief executive – Mark Zuckerberg said it was time for the social network to “start focusing on what platforms will come next to enable even more useful, entertaining and personal experiences”.

The answer, for the billionaire entrepreneur, is contained in the purchase of Oculus, the maker of the distinctive $350 Rift headset – which looks like a massive pair of opaque diving goggles.

Once strapped on to a person’s face – and supplemented by a set of headphones, and they are capable of transporting the bearer into a new field of experience .

Inside, there is a screen for each eye, displaying high-resolution video generated by a computer.

They render a 3D image taking up your entire field of view, while advanced motion tracking technology allows the eye-screens to track the movements of the head.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re going to make Oculus a platform for many other experiences,” said Zuckerberg, offering a window into his thinking.

“Imagine enjoying a courtside seat at a game, studying in a classroom of students and teachers all over the world or consulting with a doctor face-to-face – just by putting on goggles in your home.”

However, anyone who has heard about virtual reality will know this sort of excitement is familiar. The technology has proved tough to develop.

Previous efforts have fallen prey to bad screens, worse graphics and nonexistent motion tracking.

ADVERTISEMENT

But worst of all is the nausea. Bad VR can play havoc with your body’s sense of location, and lead to acute motion sickness.

The Rift attempts to beat those problems with a high-resolution display, super-accurate head-tracking sensors and a range of technologies designed to minimise the sickness. And, with Facebook’s money behind it, improvements will come ever quicker.

Facebook is not alone in betting on the new wave of virtual reality. “Oculus was founded on the contrarian belief that the right people at the right time could finally deliver on the science fiction promise,” said Chris Dixon, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital firm which pumped early investments into both Facebook and Oculus (as well as another company bought by Facebook, the photo-sharing website Instagram).

“Hardware components had become sufficiently powerful and inexpensive, and the pioneering engineers who invented 3D gaming were eager to explore a new frontier,” Dixon said. “Last year, my partner Gil Shafir and I spent time studying Oculus and virtual reality technology more generally.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The more we learned, the more we became convinced that virtual reality would become central to the next great wave of computing.”

Nor is Oculus the first surprising acquisition for Zuckerberg. Earlier this month, Facebook announced the purchase of Titan Aerospace, a manufacturer of solar-powered drones.

But that was easily linked to one of Facebook’s existing business: Titan’s drones can stay airborne for five years, making them a cost-effective replacement for orbital satellites and crucial for Facebook’s Internet.org project to connect the developing world to the internet.

The Oculus purchase is the first time the company has looked so far ahead, although it remains a considerable risk in the era where 3D television has struggled to win over consumers because few people want to wear glasses at home for a technology that is not obviously better than high definition.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are also likely to be challenges of taste too. Already, the first adult-only software for Oculus has arrived, with companies such as Wicked Paradise preparing fully motion-captured “episodic erotic games”.

That might not be the sort of “personal experience” that Mark Zuckerberg is looking for either. But he will need some sort of compelling application if the technology – and his $2bn bet – is to succeed.

Bought by Facebook

Instagram, bought in April 2012, $1bn

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2012, Facebook astonished the tech industry with its purchase of the mobile photo app. Two years on, it is regarded as a smart move for a firm trying to redefine itself as mobile first. There has been intense competition with rival Twitter since the deal, with Instagram removing Twitter integration and Twitter blocking “find my Twitter friends” from Instagram.

Face.com, June 2012, $21m

The acquisition of the Israeli facial recognition company Face.com made a statement about Facebook’s plan to dominate the photo-sharing market. Face.com’s technology was soon incorporated into the “tag suggest” feature, allowing users to automatically tag themselves in friends’ pictures, but it also led to problems. Just months later, the company had to turn off the feature in the EU after Irish regulators ruled that infringed the privacy of users.

Branch, January 2014, $15m

ADVERTISEMENT

Branch media was started by Twitter co-founders Ev Williams and Biz Stone, and attempted to encourage more in-depth discussion from social media. Facebook was interested in the core technology, and acquired the team to improve its own comment features.

WhatsApp, February 2014, $19bn

The biggest acquisition to date. Facebook wanted WhatsApp’s 450 million monthly users, all attracted by the simplicity of the free, mobile-focused messaging service. Some have viewed the deal as a defensive move by Facebook, which has gained control of a competitor that may have undermined it in years to come

Titan Aerospace, March 2014, $60m

ADVERTISEMENT

A firm that specialises in solar-powered drones that fly at high altitude seems an odd thing for Facebook to buy. They are capable of staying airborne for five years at a time, which makes them a suitable replacement for orbital satellites. Facebook’s plan is to use them for its Internet.org project, which aims to connect five billion people in developing nations to the web.

…and the one that got away

Snapchat

Snapchat, the ephemeral photo messaging service, seemed mad to reject Facebook’s offer of $3bn for a buyout. The company, which was two years old and still “pre-profitable” in Silicon Valley parlance, decided it was worth more, and turned it down. Snapchat hopes to become a competitor to Facebook, rather than just a subsidiary of it. But in the months since, it’s been beset by security flaws, and already some are fearing that its young users may move on to something else. Should it have taken the money when it could?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2014

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Russians to prod Putin on poverty and his personal life as his ratings tank

Published

on

Russians are set to ask President Vladimir Putin about growing poverty at home and tensions abroad during an annual televised phone-in Thursday, which comes following a fall in his approval ratings.

The leader is also likely to face a degree of grilling on his personal life, according to questions submitted by the public online ahead of the live show.

Set to be held for the 17th time since Putin came to power in 1999, the show starts at 0900 GMT and usually lasts several hours.

Ahead of the carefully choreographed show, more than one million questions had been submitted, organisers told Russian news agencies.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trump could turn on Hope Hicks just like Michael Cohen: Trump family biographer warns

Published

on

Trump family biographer Emily Jane Fox explained that she didn't think that the president would turn on long-time aide Hope Hicks, but then again, it was the same thought about Michael Cohen as well.

In a panel discussion about Hicks' testimony during MSNBC's Brian Williams' Wednesday show, Fox recalled that Micahel Cohen once said that he would take a bullet for the president. Once it appeared that Trump would throw him under the bus, Cohen began looking for a way out.

The same scenario seems to be happening with Hicks now.

"She works at new Fox, which is a company run by a Murdoch son," Fox said. "It's a company that's brand new. She's the head of communications there. And there are shareholders who would take issue with the fact that a senior member of this company is being put in this situation and being thrust on the world stage."

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Trump jumped to Speaker Pelosi’s defense in marathon Fox News interview

Published

on

In a strange twist, President Donald Trump appeared to defend House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity Wednesday.

Hannity began by saying to Trump that he believes Pelosi has lost control of her own party, as officials like Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) continue to call for impeachment.

"I say Nancy Pelosi is the speaker in name only," Hannity told Trump, calling Ocasio-Cortez the real start.

But what Trump said was the unusual point.

"I think Nancy Pelosi probably has control of it, I hear different things, but I think she does," Trump said, appearing to defend the Speaker. "She knows what she's doing. We will see how it all comes out."

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link