Quantcast
Connect with us

Uber hits roadblock as CEO charged with operating an illegal cab service in South Korea

Published

on

South Korean prosecutors brought charges on Wednesday against the founder and CEO of controversial smartphone taxi app Uber for operating an illegal cab service, the latest roadblock for the California-based firm.

The charges, which carry a maximum penalty of two years in jail or a 20 million won ($18,150) fine, came with the company facing criticism and bad publicity around the world despite its high levels of popularity.

ADVERTISEMENT

Travis Kalanick and Uber’s Korean partner MK Korea, a local rental car service operator, were indicted for violating a law on passenger transport services.

Neither was detained, and it was not immediately clear whether Kalanick would visit Seoul for trial. Last year he showed up at a police station in Seoul for questioning.

In South Korea, rental car service operators are barred from conducting passenger transport business using their cars.

Uber said in a statement it would fully cooperate with the investigation and it is “confident” the court would make a fair and sensible judgment.

“We firmly believe that our service, which connects drivers and riders via an application, is not only legal in Korea, but that it is being welcomed and supported by consumers,” the statement said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Uber, which operates in more than 50 countries, started its service in Seoul in 2013.

Last year the company launched Uber Black, which links users with limousines and, in October this year, it unveiled UberX, which connects passengers with drivers of non-luxury vehicles.

The Seoul city government, however, filed complaints with prosecutors, saying Uber’s operations raised passenger safety issues and threatened the livelihoods of licensed taxi drivers.

ADVERTISEMENT

– One million won reward –

City regulators have launched a crackdown on drivers and rental cars that cooperate with Uber, with a one million won reward offered for those who reported the company’s activities.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Uber has vowed to continue its business regardless of the crackdown.

South Korea’s online community was split over the indictment, with some users describing Uber as illegal and supporting the crackdown on its service in order to protect domestic taxi drivers.

“Uber is illegal and endangers the livelihood of our taxi drivers,” one user wrote on the popular Internet portal Naver.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, another user named SungNoChoi wrote: “Uber is providing a service catering to our clients. Its fate should be decided by consumers.”

Uber is the most prominent of several smartphone apps that are shaking up the traditional taxi landscape in cities around the world.

It has already faced significant resistance from regulators in several countries, who accuse it of unfair competition and a lack of standards.

Uber has also sparked angry protests by cab drivers in France and other countries who fear it is chipping away at their client base.

ADVERTISEMENT

It made headlines this month when an Uber driver allegedly raped a passenger in New Delhi.

Also on Wednesday the company apologised for raising prices as frightened people fled an armed cafe siege in the Australian city of Sydney last week.

The firm reportedly charged customers four times the regular fare to leave the area — a move that sparked outrage.

Globally Uber has defended surge pricing, arguing it effectively matches supply with demand by encouraging drivers to move to areas where there are shortfalls.

ADVERTISEMENT

It has, however, had to concede to cap surge pricing throughout the United States during national emergencies after reaching an agreement with regulators.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Trump was caught’: Every major GOP excuse for president’s conduct destroyed by ex-prosecutor

Published

on

Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade said Thursday's marathon impeachment hearing left her "shouting" at her television, so she gathered her thoughts and blew up Republican defenses one by one.

McQuade, an MSNBC legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, exposed the weaknesses in each of the GOP's sometimes contradictory defenses of President Donald Trump against impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Here are the GOP defenses I have heard so far to articles of impeachment, along with the knee-jerk responses I have been shouting at my television.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Selfie-seeking frat boy’ Matt Gaetz scorched in brutal takedown after House committee blow-up

Published

on

In a brutally blunt look at Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), the New Republic's Jacob Bacharach paints a portrait of a publicity-seeking Washington newcomer storming the nation's capital with an eye on mirroring the actions and rhetoric of the blustery president that he slavishly defends.

Following Gaetz's "drama queen" performances while serving on the House Judiciary Committee, Bacharach recalls, "On October 23, a gaggle of House Republicans, led by Matt Gaetz of Florida, stormed the Capitol’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. Gaetz had hoped to expose the supposedly secretive nature of the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump. “Stormed” was his own overly dramatic word (though Gaetz soon topped it by comparing his crew to the 300 glorious, nearly naked Spartans who, as you may recall, lost to a numerically superior force during the Battle of Thermopylae). A more accurate description would be to say they barged into a committee room like a bunch of entitled fussbudgets, argued with the committee chairman, took selfies, and then trundled off to hold a press conference."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

How the ‘liberal’ media put Trump in the White House

Published

on

The American mainstream news media made many mistakes in its coverage of the 2016 presidential election.

It treated Donald Trump as a harmless curiosity because he was a reality TV show star and professional (alleged) billionaire.

Hillary Clinton’s shortcomings — both real and perceived — were amplified. Trump’s were downplayed if not largely ignored.

Continue Reading