Quantcast
Connect with us

Dystopian techno fetus farms? Professor says technology could end abortion debate

Published

on

Future technology could allow states to set up “fetal rescue programs” and eliminate legal abortion, according to a recently published article by a law professor.

Stephen Giles, who teaches at the Quinnipiac University School of Law, argues that technology might someday advance to allow the development of fetuses in artificial environments outside the womb.

This, Giles argues, would eliminate the need for legal protections for abortions because zygotes, embryos, and fetuses could be extracted and transferred to an artificial womb where it could gestate to term, reported RH Reality Check.

“Is the right to an elective abortion limited to terminating the woman’s pregnancy, or does it also include the right to ensure the death of the fetus?” Giles asks.

He says that existing technology limited reproductive choices because there was no way to terminate most pregnancies without causing the death of a fetus.

“In practice, elective abortion inevitably results in fetal death,” Giles writes. “For that very reason, the woman has no choice in the matter: Should she elect to terminate her pregnancy, the fetus will die even if she wants it to survive.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He says states might set up fetal rescue centers, once technology allows for them, so women would be able to terminate their pregnancies without killing the fetus or suffering social stigma from giving up a child for adoption.

“If under these circumstances the state prohibits fetus-killing abortions and requires that surviving fetuses be transferred to the state for attempted rescue in an artificial womb, it will not be possible reasonably to conclude that the woman’s interest in a fetus-killing abortion outweighs the state’s interest in the life of the pre-viable fetus,” Giles argues.

Under the plan Giles suggests, women would not be able to terminate a pregnancy without turning over the embryo, zygote, or fetus to gestate in an artificial womb and relinquishing her parental rights.

His suggestion doesn’t address the parental rights of spouses, partners, or other family members.

ADVERTISEMENT

Giles predicts states might mandate and operate fetal rescue centers, but he didn’t specify how those would be implemented or funded.

He also fails to outline what might happen to these children once they are born.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mitch McConnell caves into Jon Stewart on 9/11 first responders — finally agrees to meet with them

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was completely eviscerated by former "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart last week, after McConnell refused to hold a vote on continuing to fund medical care for the 9/11 first responders and workers who helped clean up the collapsed buildings after the attack. But now he's giving in, for now, The New York Post reported.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump is endangering the US by governing like he’s directing a reality TV show: officials

Published

on

President Donald Trump seems to be waffling on whether or not he wants a war in Iran. As it stands, he seems to be against it, pulling back on a military strike that would have killed 150 people and most certainly begun another Middle Eastern war.

In a report from the Washington Post, leaders from policy to politics are telling the president to get it together. The "freewheeling" style of politics may have been a quirky style, but now it's putting the United States in a difficult position.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Conservative columnist tells Trump make good on his threats with Iran or ‘shut up’

Published

on

President Donald Trump appeared to back down last week when it came to an attack on Iran after an oil tanker was allegedly fired upon and the country shot down a U.S. drone during surveillance.

Republicans and even Trump himself has mocked former President Barack Obama for drawing a "red line" for Syria but being unwilling to act further. In Obama's case, the president saw the country cross the red line and asked Congress to give him a declaration of war. Republicans refused at the time.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH 

Trump endorses killing journalists, like Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Raw Story is investing in progressive journalism. Ad-free memberships support original reporting. Help us make a difference.

Learn why we're trying to limit ads.
close-link