Quantcast
Connect with us

Royals take unusual step to deny Prince Andrew underage sex claims

Published

on

Duke of York returns early from skiing holiday in Switzerland as Buckingham Palace lawyers are said to be assessing legal position

Buckingham Palace officials have scrambled to quell the growing crisis engulfing Prince Andrew after claims in an American court case that he had “sexual relations” with an underage girl who had been forced into sexual slavery by the multi-millionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Duke of York returned to Windsor from a new year holiday in the Swiss ski resort of Verbier to face what courtiers described as “lurid and deeply personal” claims detailing his alleged relations over a decade ago with Virginia Roberts.

US court papers filed last week alleged that Roberts, described using the alias Jane Doe #3, was forced to have “sexual relations” with Prince Andrew in London, New York and on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands during an alleged orgy with other underage girls.

British newspapers published earlier interviews with Roberts in which she claimed to detail her alleged encounters with Prince Andrew.

The Guardian was aware of Roberts’s identity on Thursday but decided not to name her out of respect for her wish to bring the case anonymously.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, over the weekend she was named by several newspapers and subsequently by Buckingham Palace. Her lawyers are aware their client has now been named and pictured by several other British newspapers.

The court papers were filed by Roberts’s lawyers to a district court in Florida as part of a case against the US government over a plea bargain it struck with Epstein. They said Epstein instructed her “to give the prince whatever he demanded and required [her] to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse”.

Aides stepped up a highly unusual royal operation launched on Saturday to categorically deny the claims. Prince Andrew personally decided to issue a strong denial while still in Verbier.

ADVERTISEMENT

He approved a statement, extraordinary in its frankness for a member of the royal family, which vehemently denied “any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts” and added: “The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”

In an attempt to stem the flow of sordid allegations Buckingham Palace on Sunday wrote to editors reminding them of their responsibilities under the Independent Press Standards Organisation code and the law. Palace lawyers were also said to be closely reviewing coverage and “assessing the legal position in respect of Sunday’s newspapers”.

Prince Andrew’s friendship with Epstein, once known as one of America’s richest financiers, was first questioned in 2007 when it emerged that the FBI had begun an investigation into claims Epstein was paying underage girls for sex. Then in 2008 a federal inquiry was dropped after Epstein negotiated a deal with prosecutors in which he agreed to plead guilty to soliciting paid sex with a minor. He served 13 months of an 18-month sentence and is now a registered sex offender. Many of his alleged victims have since reached out-of-court settlements with Epstein.

ADVERTISEMENT

The latest court papers seek disclosure of any documents that may suggest that Prince Andrew, along with the Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, lobbied the US government to give Epstein a more favourable plea deal and a non-prosecution agreement.

Buckingham Palace issued a strenuous denial stating: “The Duke of York would not and did not interfere in an active case.” Dershowitz has also denied the claim.

The Guardian understands the plea deal states: “If Epstein successfully fulfils all the terms of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein including but not limited to [four named individuals not including Prince Andrew or Dershowitz].”

ADVERTISEMENT

It could mean that if Prince Andrew is ever considered a “co-conspirator” with Epstein, he could be prevented from facing criminal charges.

On Sunday the Duke went straight to his home at the Royal Lodge at Windsor Castle and is expected to maintain a low profile in the coming days, although he is not understood to have cancelled any events.

The Queen is set to remain in Sandringham, scotching reports of face-to-face crisis talks as soon as her son arrived in the UK.

ADVERTISEMENT

Palace aides said that despite the allegations Prince Andrew planned to continue his work promoting vocational education, technology and enterprise.

Explaining Prince Andrew’s decision to breach royal convention and directly tackle allegations about his private life, an aide said: “When there are lurid and deeply personal allegations made against you to a national newspaper that are directly linked to a civil case in which you are accused of having sexual relations with underage minors, the natural instinct is to come out and say it is not true.

“The Duke did not want these claims to go uncontested. Commenting on a member of the royal family’s private life or commenting an ongoing legal case goes against what the palace would do typically.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The default position is no comment but these are extraordinary circumstances and given the allegations filed in court and coming from the Sunday papers, the decision was taken that it was time to issue a denial on the record.”

According to Roberts’s court filing, Dershowitz is also accused of having sexual relations with her “on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida, but on private planes, in New York, New Mexico and the US Virgin Islands”.

On Saturday he told the BBC’s Today programme: “The story is totally made up”.

ADVERTISEMENT

He claimed: “She’s lied about other public figures including a former prime minister and others who she claims to have participated in sexual activities with, so I think it must be presumed all her allegations against Prince Andrew were false as well,” he said. He told the Guardian: “I will fight this to the very end. I want the facts to come out.”

He said he did not believe the language in Epstein’s plea deal, barring criminal charges against “any potential co-conspirators”, would necessarily give him immunity from prosecution.

However, in the event that the promise not to prosecute co-conspirators did apply to him, Dershowitz insisted he would “waive any possibly immunity” to clear his name.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dershowitz said his lawyers would submit a sworn affidavit to both the Florida court and the judicial bar on Monday, categorically denying sexual relations with any minors, accusing Roberts of making-up the story.

Roberts declined to comment on Sunday. But in a statement released through her lawyers last week, she said: “These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I’m not going to be bullied back into silence.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2015

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Has anything changed since Burning Man’s sex assault and labor issues were exposed?

Published

on

The last weekend in August marks the start of Burning Man, a week-long, festival in the Nevada desert consisting of freewheeling performance art, fanciful costumes, and a lot of drugs. The anarchic party with more than 50,000 attendees constitutes a pilgrimage for many attendees, lured by the promise of leaving the “default world” behind in exchange for a transformative or even spiritual experience.

This article originally appeared at Salon.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Truckers are facing a ‘bloodbath’ in their industry — and it’s turning many in the pro-Trump group against him: report

Published

on

Truckers are numerous, conservative, and hurting. And despite their widespread support for Donald Trump’s candidacy in 2016, a new report from Business Insider suggests the pain in the industry might be turning these workers away from the president.

The political trends in trucking are not insignificant. According to the American Trucking Associations, there were an estimated 3.5 million truck drivers in 2018. RTS Financial has found that there are 7.4 million jobs total “tied to the trucking industry.” And Business Insider reported that nearly 90 percent of truckers are registered voters, higher than the general population.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Trump’s collusion with Russia is now a topic for impeachment — along with obstruction and racism

Published

on

President Donald Trump's interactions with Russia are now a topic of the impeachment investigation.

"There was an important development in support for impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives today," MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell reported Tuesday. "Important both in who the new support comes from and what that support is based on."

"Congresswoman Lauren Underwood of Illinois is one of the freshmen Democrats who flipped a Republican district last year in winning her election. She brings the total number of House Democrats supporting impeachment now to 126 -- a majority of the Democrats' 235 members of the House," he explained.

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image