Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Excuse me, I’m anti-jihad!’ Pam Geller tells CNN her critics are the real Islamophobes

Published

on

Pamela Geller got into a combative debate with CNN host Alisyn Camerota on Monday after being accused of “incendiary and provocative” anti-Islam activism.

The discussion came just hours after two men were shot and killed by police after opening fire on an event hosted by Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative. The group had offered a $10,000 prize to draw a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I haven’t heard anyone in the media saying that it’s okay for gunmen to show up at an event like this. But what people are saying is that there’s always this fine line, you know, between freedom of speech and being intentionally incendiary and provocative,” Camerota remarked.

“Intentionally incendiary and provocative by drawing a cartoon,” Geller shot back. “This is the low state of freedom of speech in this country. I disagree, and I disagree most vehemently. The First Amendment, not the Eighth, not the 10th, but the Dirst, protects all speech, not just ideas that we like. But even core political speech, ideas that we don’t like, because who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? The Islamic state? The government?”

“When Jesus Christ was put in a jar of urine it was called art,” she added. “Did Christians like it? Of course not. Did they slaughter people? Did they burn embassies? Did they kill whole communities? Of course not. This cannot be sanctioned. This cannot be sanctioned. The West must stand up for freedom of speech. It’s the core, fundamental element of this constitutional republic.”

Geller, who is also the leader of the group Stop Islamization of America, accused her critics of being “Islamophobic.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have to be able to discuss and when you say I’m anti-Muslim. Excuse me, I’m anti-jihad. And anyone that says that I’m anti-Muslim is implying that all Muslims support jihad,” she explained.

Camerota told Geller she was viewed as anti-Muslim because she believed Muslims were inherently violent.

“The bottom line is that — freedom of speech can never be met with violence,” Camerota said. “No one can ever open fire on a group of innocent people. I mean obviously that is from the get-go, that’s where you and I and everybody in this country agrees. But there is a debate to be had about what the line is between freedom of speech and provocation. The point is — isn’t that you don’t have the right to do it. Of course you have the right to do it. It just seems that you don’t draw the distinction between extremism and violence and Islam as a whole.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“And you don’t draw the distinction between civilized men and savages,” Geller replied, “because you’re saying that if something I say offends someone, then they have the right to behave in a certain way; that it’s going to incite them. I think it’s ridiculous. I think the blasphemy laws under the Sharia is ridiculous. I think the people that tens of thousands of people that are slaughtered under this law is monstrous. And that’s what you and I should be addressing.”

After arguing over whether Geller had described Islam as a religion of savages, Camerota told Geller the event “wasn’t just about the violence.”

“My event was about freedom of speech, period,” Geller said. “Freedom of speech is the First Amendment. It’s the first and most protected political speech — the most protected because who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? These arbitrary voices? You? The Muslim Brotherhood?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to have this conversation, and the fact that we have to spend upwards of $50,000 in security speaks to how dangerous and how in trouble freedom of speech is in this country. And then we have to get on these new shows and somehow we are — those that are targeted, those that were going to be slaughtered are the ones who get attacked speaks to how morally inverted this conversation is.”

Watch video below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Michael Moore predicts Mick Mulvaney will get into Heaven after confessing Trump’s quid pro quo

Published

on

Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore predicted acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney will ascend to Heaven in the afterlife during a Friday interview on MSNBC's "The Beat" with Ari Melber.

The host played a clip of Mulvaney admitting Trump's quid pro quo while seeking foreign election assistance from Ukraine.

"This man obviously is going to be admitted into Heaven," Moore said. "You know, he told the truth."

"If there was a movie version of this, somebody stuck him with a needle just before he walked out onto the stage there, a truth serum needle, and he just went on and on saying, 'Yeah, that’s what we do. Yeah, of course.' Essentially admitting there is a quid pro quo. In fact, there are many quid pro quos."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘I don’t think he knows what he’s doing’: Ex-Trump advisor rips the ‘cascading crisis’ of his ‘strategic disaster’

Published

on

President Donald Trump received harsh criticism from a former top Middle East advisor for the ethnic cleansing campaign Turkey is waging against the Kurds in Syria.

MSNBC's Chuck Todd interviewed Brett McGurk, the former special presidential envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL.

"The truth of the matter is when President Trump announced to the world last December that we were leaving Syria and he arbitrarily cut our force reportedly in half, which is already a small force, we lost all of our leverage and influence," McGurk argued. "And he really threw it out the window on this call on October 6th."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump’s Narcissistic Personality Disorder is ‘generally agreed’ upon: Columnist declares the president ‘unfit’

Published

on

The refusal of Republicans to use the 25th Amendment to remove President Donald Trump from office and elevate Vice President Mike Pence has increased the importance of the impeachment inquiry, Leonard Hitchcock explained on Friday.

Like prominent GOP attorney George Conway, Hitchcock believes Trump suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).

"There are nine diagnostic criteria of NPD in the DSM-5, and a diagnosis is valid if only five are present. Narcissists have a grandiose sense of self-importance, i.e. they exaggerate their achievements and talents; they are preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power or brilliance; they believe that they are special, unique and should associate only with other high-status or special people; they require excessive admiration; they feel a sense of entitlement; they exploit others for their own gain; they lack empathy; they are envious of others or believe that others envy them; they are arrogant or haughty," Hitchcock wrote.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image