Quantcast
Connect with us

Louie Gohmert goes crazy on the House floor: Is Obama a terrorist? I’m just asking!

Published

on

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) asked Thursday on the floor of the U.S. House whether President Barack Obama might be a terrorist.

The Tea Party lawmaker was reading quotes by Islamic extremists calling for the destruction of Israel when he made the suggestion.

“When people make clear that they are going to commit murder or genocide, how long do you have to wait before it is okay to stop them?” Gohmert said. “Well, the President has made clear it may be time to move out of the way so that these Palestinians that want to obliterate Israel can have their will.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Gohmert, who has questioned the circumstances of the president’s birth, drew on his experience as a Smith County district court judge to sketch an analogy.

“Back in my days as a felony judge, when you have somebody who is driving a car and people say, ‘Hey, we just need a ride to this location. Once we get there, we are going to murder some people, but we don’t need anything from you. We just need a ride,’” Gohmert said. “The person that drove that car, knowing that those people made those comments about wanting to kill people when they get to that location, they are also guilty of murder.”

His qualifying remarks actually made more clear that he was suggesting Obama was aiding and abetting terrorists.

“I am not accusing anybody, I am raising questions,” Gohmert said. “If the United States says, ‘Here, Palestinian terrorist groups, we want to provide you the vehicle to have a powerful place right in the middle, a huge section of Israel. We want to give you that place, and you have made clear, we know you have made clear, once you are there, you are going to wipe out Israel,’ does that make the United States’ leaders that facilitate that, does that make them accessories? I am just asking.”

“Mr. Speaker, you can advise the Parliamentarian, I am not accusing anybody,” he added. “I am just asking the question.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He said the president should not side with anyone threatening genocide or murder — which he claimed the Palestinians were.

“Netanyahu has made very clear they want peace, but how can they sit down with people who will not even acknowledge they have a right to exist?” Gohmert said. “That is not a precondition — that is a condition for wiping them off the map as a threat to mankind if they are not willing to recognize that genocide is inappropriate.”

Watch his remarks posted online by GohmertTX01:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ivanka Trump and dossier author Christopher Steele maintained a years-long correspondence

Published

on

Dossier author Christopher Steele met Ivanka Trump nearly a decade before her father's election campaign, and they corresponded for years.

The relationship was alluded to in the Department of Justice inspector general's report released Monday, showing that Steele was favorably disposed to Donald Trump and his family due to the relationship.

ABC News confirmed that Steele and the president's daughter had met at a dinner in 2007, and Ivanka Trump corresponded with the former British spy about a possible working relationship.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Inspector general found ‘no evidence of political bias’ in Trump-Russia probe: report

Published

on

Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on the origins of the probe into the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia has found that there was no evidence of political bias on the part of law enforcement officials who began the investigation.

The Associated Press reports that the report "is expected to conclude there was an adequate basis for opening one of the most politically sensitive investigations in FBI history and one that Trump has denounced as a witch hunt."

The IG's report also found that former British spy Christopher Steele, whose infamous dossier on Trump featured salacious allegations about the president and Russian prostitutes, played no role in the opening of the probe, despite claims from Trump's Republican allies who argued that it was central to the investigation.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

DOJ argues Congress can’t stop Trump Org from taking foreign payments — despite Constitution’s emoluments clause

Published

on

The so-called emoluments clause has been the center of a case that many legal scholars have been making that President Donald Trump is regularly violating the Constitution by continuing to accept payments from foreign governments via his businesses.

The Washington Post reports that an attorney from the Trump Department of Justice argued on Monday that the emoluments clause doesn't actually prevent Trump from accepting payments from foreign governments, even though the clause specifically states that "no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Continue Reading