Quantcast
Connect with us

New Jersey priest raped 15-year-old in rectory and then said ‘evil’ teen ‘wanted’ it: report

Published

on

A former New Jersey priest who is accused of raping a 15-year-old boy said this week that the teen had “evil” thoughts and “wanted” to have sex.

Earlier this year, Max Rojas Ramirez filed a lawsuit against the Archdiocese of Newark alleging that he had been raped by Rev. Manuel Gallo Espinoza in a rectory bedroom at the age of 15.

Ramirez told NJ Advance Media that he did not know that he was speaking to Father Espinoza when he admitted in confessional that he was confused about his sexuality, which he said resulted from being molested by a male cousin at the age of 8.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was looking for guidance and trying to figure out all these things, and eventually I came to tell him about the attraction I had toward guys,” he recalled.

Not long after that, the priest contacted Ramirez and requested to see him in person, and then refused to take him home, insisting that he spend the night in the rectory.

That night, Ramirez said that he woke up and “felt something very heavy on top of me.”

“It hurt. I was in pain,” Ramirez explained. “My eyes popped open, and he had his whole body on top of me. He started touching me and kissing me. I was shaking. I couldn’t move. I couldn’t talk.”

“Don’t worry,” Gallo Espinoza reportedly told him. “This is what God wants.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ramirez recalled being stripped naked by the priest and being raped before he blacked out.

Espinoza, who fled to Ecuador in 2003, told NJ Advance Media this week that he regretted the encounter, but that Ramirez “wanted” it.

“One thing that I am conscious (of) is he was at that time a teenager, and it is a big mistake for me. But I didn’t force him to do anything he didn’t want,” Espinoza wrote in an email. “He was older (sic) enough to walk away, but I think that I was attracted to him, that is the only explanation that I can think right now.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“He had something evil in his mind. He approached me many times,” he added.

When asked if he knew that raping a 15-year-old child was a crime, Espinoza suggested that it was legal in his home country of Ecuador because a person of that age “is not consider (sic) so innocent.” The age of consent in Ecuador is 14 years old.

ADVERTISEMENT

Espinoza said that he fled to Ecuador in 2003 after the church’s youth group leader, Antonino Salazar, and the boy’s godfather, Jeive Hercules, warned him that he was “going to get in big trouble.”

“You better leave,” the men advised, according to Espinoza. “God prays for you. Go back to your country.”

Although Ecuador has an extradition treaty with the United States, a 2012 study found that the country declined to extradite anyone between 2003 and 2011. In contrast, Colombia turned over 1,201 people during that same period.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

MLK was ‘gravely disappointed’ with white moderates — whom he believed were responsible for impeding civil rights

Published

on

"We also realize that the problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power."

—Martin Luther King Jr., 1967

This Martin Luther King Jr. Day comes as moderate Democrats, falling in line behind former vice president Joe Biden, are warning that the party risks re-electing Donald Trump if it nominates too radical a candidate for president — by which they mean someone like Senators Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe catches Alan Dershowitz in humiliating hypocrisy

Published

on

Harvard Constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe called out President Donald Trump's lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, Sunday on Twitter, noting that his opinions seem to evolve depending on who he's defending.

Dershowitz is on a kind of press junket for the president, defending him in various media appearances. The former lawyer to Jeffrey Epstein is handling Trump's defense as it pertains to the abuse of power. Dershowitz thinks that charge has no basis in law. In fact, impeachment trials aren't actually legal proceedings, they're political proceedings, because the Justice Department claimed that Trump can't be indicted under the law while he's president.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘You cannot expect anything but fascism’: Pedagogy theorist on how Trump ‘legitimated a culture of lying, cruelty and a collapse of social responsibility’

Published

on

The impeachment of Donald Trump appears to be a crisis without a history, at least a history that illuminates, not just comparisons with other presidential impeachments, but a history that provides historical lessons regarding its relationship to a previous age of tyranny that ushered in horrors associated with a fascist politics in the 1930s.  In the age of Trump, history is now used to divert and elude the most serious questions to be raised about the impeachment crisis. The legacy of earlier presidential impeachments, which include Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, provide a comparative historical context for analysis and criticism. And while Trump’s impeachment is often defined as a more serious constitutional crisis given his attempt to use the power of the presidency to advance his personal political agenda, it is a crisis that willfully ignores the conditions that gave rise to Trump’s presidency along with its recurring pattern of authoritarian behavior, policies, and practices.  One result is that the impeachment process with its abundance of political theater and insipid media coverage treats Trump’s crimes as the endpoint of an abuse of power and an illegal act, rather than as a political action that is symptomatic of a long legacy of conditions that have led to the United States’ slide into the abyss of authoritarianism.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image