Quantcast
Connect with us

Indiana court throws out murder convictions for three unarmed teens who didn’t kill anyone

Published

on

The Indiana supreme court has thrown out the “felony murder” convictions of three of the Elkhart Four, overturning the bizarre situation in which unarmed teenagers who had no intention of killing anybody and who did not pull the trigger were sentenced to 55 years in prison after one of their friends was shot dead by a homeowner whose house they had burgled.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related: Felony murder: why a teenager who didn’t kill anyone faces 55 years in jail

The highest court in the state on Friday stripped out the contentious “felony murder” conviction for Blake Layman, now 19, Anthony Sharp, 21, and Levi Sparks, 20, stating that none of the three had ever engaged in any “dangerously violent and threatening conduct”.

The judges reduced the convictions to simple burglary and ordered the lower courts to re-sentence the prisoners accordingly.

The case of the Elkhart Four has caught the imaginations of people across the United States and around the world as one of the most egregious examples of the “felony murder” phenomenon. The crime exists on the statute books of 46 states, 11 of which allow people to be prosecuted even though they were the victims, not the perpetrators, of a shooting.

In the case of the Elkhart Four, the then-teenagers decided on the spur of the moment to break into what they thought was a vacant house in order to steal a few things to get some ready cash. None of the five individuals involved in the burglary were armed or had any history of firearms.

ADVERTISEMENT

They broke into the house in Elkhart, a small town in Indiana, on 3 October 2012. The fateful mistake they made was that the house was not empty – its owner, Rodney Scott, was actually asleep in his bed upstairs.

Scott was awoken by the sound of the boys breaking into his house. He grabbed his gun, came down the stairs and let out a couple of shots – one went through Blake Layman’s leg, the other hit his accomplice, Danzele Johnson, 21, in the chest. He was killed.

That the homeowner, not the boys, had owned the gun and pulled the trigger did not prevent the boys from being charged with “felony murder”, convicted at trial and sentenced to up to 55 years. Another boy, Jose Quiroz, pleaded guilty to the crime and as a result was not party to Friday’s supreme court ruling.

ADVERTISEMENT

In an interview with Layman in Wabash Valley maximum-security prison in Indiana in February, he said he deeply regretted his decision to commit the burglary and felt intense remorse for the death of Johnson.

“I’ve thought about it a lot,” he said. “I made this bad decision and it derailed my entire life. I just wish I could go back and tell my 16-year-old self to see sense.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He added: ““I know I did wrong. I know I committed a crime. From the very beginning I’ve never disputed that. If they had brought me a burglary plea bargain I would have signed it, because I was guilty. I made a bad choice, and I gladly take responsibility for it.”

But in legal argument in front of the supreme court lawyers for Layman, Sharp and Sparks argued that despite their guilt in having broken into the house, they should not be punished to long prison sentences for a murder that they did not commit and had no intention of committing. In its ruling, the judges agreed.

The court found that “when the group broke and entered the residence of the homeowner intending to commit a theft – a burglary – not only were they unarmed, but also neither the Appellants nor their cohorts engaged in any ‘dangerously violent and threatening conduct.’ There was simply nothing about the Appellants’ conduct or the conduct of their cohorts that was ‘clearly the mediate or immediate cause’ of their friend’s death”.

ADVERTISEMENT

The three prisoners are likely to remain in custody for some time. Indiana’s sentencing structure allows for an upper punishment for burglary of 20 years.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2015


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Chris Wallace shreds Ken Starr: Trump’s scandal ‘a much bigger issue than whether Bill Clinton lied about sex’

Published

on

Fox News host Chris Wallace argued that the deeds President Donald Trump is accused of are more serious to the country than President Bill Clinton's actions, who was impeached for lying about sex.

During a break in impeachment hearings on Monday, Wallace called out Ken Starr's "characterization of this process and what we heard today... he said that the presentation against the president is narrow, prosecutors look through the world through dirty windows, it's slanted."

"And you know, it just seems to me -- and Ken, I see you there on the screen so I'll be talking directly to you -- when you compare this to the Clinton impeachment, which was basically about whether the president had lied under oath about sex," Wallace continued. "I'm not talking about whether this story is true or not."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Estranged Republican horrified her former party thinks Trump is better than Lincoln

Published

on

Estranged former Republican Ashley Pratte found herself aghast by a recent poll showing a majority of GOP voters now rate President Donald Trump more favorably than Abraham Lincoln.

Writing for NBC News, Pratte argued that Lincoln, widely considered by historians to be one of America's greatest presidents, was the polar opposite of Trump.

"Trump’s years in office have been full of nepotism, scandal, profiting from his position as president and now he is about to become the third-ever president to be impeached," she argued. "So how can those same Republicans now honestly believe that Trump has, in any way, been a good president, let alone one of the best?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Castor lies’: GOP counsel busted for peddling Ukraine falsehood in impeachment testimony

Published

on

Republican counsel Stephen Castor lied during his impeachment defense of President Donald Trump.

The GOP attorney testified that Ukrainian officials "did not learn (military aid) was paused until the pause was reported publicly in the U.S. media on Aug. 28," but Just Security editor-in-chief Ryan Goodman said that claim was false.

#CastorLies

Castor: Ukraine officials "did not learn it was paused until the pause was reported publicly in the US media on August 28"

Continue Reading