Quantcast
Connect with us

Apple vs. the FBI: What’s the beef and why your privacy may be at stake

Published

on

You may have heard that Apple and the FBI are fighting over an iPhone recovered during the investigation of the San Bernardino massacre last December, and that it may have serious implications for your own smartphone.

Apple has been asked to help break into that phone, and they have refused to comply; the FBI has gotten a court order compelling them to do so. Apple has said it will fight the order and the Feds have accused the firm of prioritising its “public brand marketing strategy” over a terrorism investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

How did all this start?

Last December Syed Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people and died in a shootout with police after a car chase. Police seized all their electronics in order to find out more about the pair, only to discover that the killers had smashed their cellphones and removed the hard drive from their laptop. An iPhone 5c belonging to Farook – his work phone – was found in the car where they died.

Why can’t the FBI get into the smartphone?

Apple has spent the past few years positioning itself as The Privacy Company. The tech giant has increased its security against everyone, including themselves, with the biggest change coming in an update to its operating system pushed out in September 2014, iOS 8. Apple used to cooperate with requests to grab information off iPhones – they limited the scope of the data the police could recover, and they only allowed it to be done at their Cupertino HQ, but with iOS 8, they told the FBI that even their internal hacking tools wouldn’t work any more.

ADVERTISEMENT

The FBI probably didn’t like that

Nope. Two weeks after the operating system started its rollout, the FBI director, James Comey, gave an angry speech lambasting the tech industry for helping “bad guys”.

“Have we become so mistrustful of government and law enforcement in particular that we are willing to let bad guys walk away, willing to leave victims in search of justice?” Comey said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why can’t Apple do it just this once? The president’s spokesman said it only wants access to this phone.

The specific software the FBI is asking for might only work on an iPhone 5c but the legal precedent it sets would be far more versatile.

Related: Inside the FBI’s encryption battle with Apple

ADVERTISEMENT

So the FBI might be able to get into my iPhone after this case?

Not immediately. This case only concerns a specific iPhone 5c, but in a larger sense, it’s about whether the FBI can compel Apple to provide keys to devices it wants to look inside. Software that would look inside an iPhone 6 or an iPad isn’t what this case is about, but if Apple loses, there would be a strong legal precedent if the FBI wanted to make the same demand for an iPhone 6 the next day.

What kind of hi-tech law allows the FBI to tell a company to make a new piece of software to break into my phone?

ADVERTISEMENT

That would be the All Writs Act of 1789, which the DoJ has used at least twice before to try to compel Apple to open a smartphone. Both cases are still open. The law itself is brief and broad: “The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”

The act is one of last resort. All other avenues have to be exhausted before the All Writs Act can be invoked.

Does Apple have the ability to just make a software update that will make my password worthless?

ADVERTISEMENT

Not that we know of. The FBI will still have its work cut out for it even if Apple is eventually forced to comply; there’s no way to get into your iPhone without the password, so an intruder has to guess it. With one particular setting turned on – which was enabled by default by Farook’s employer, who issued the phone – if you guess wrong 10 times, the phone destroys itself.

With the self-destruct mode off, the phone makes you wait a longer and longer time between guesses, up to an hour. So if someone is trying to “brute-force” the password – to just strategically guess until you get lucky and log all your guesses so you don’t repeat any – with the delay on, it would take years.

Related: FBI accuses Apple of putting its own interests over terrorism investigation

ADVERTISEMENT

What about my phone backups on iCloud?

Those are much easier for the FBI to obtain; Apple can’t make the case that it doesn’t have immediate access to them because they’re stored on Apple’s own computers.

Does Apple already have this software and secretly use it for its own purposes?

ADVERTISEMENT

Apple says no. “In the wrong hands, this software – which does not exist today – would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession,” wrote Cook.

What are the implications for me of a ruling against Apple?

The FBI has not merely told Apple to break into an iPhone, to which the company’s standard answer since the debut of iOS 8 in September 2014 has been “can’t, sorry”. They’ve essentially forcibly commissioned a new operating system from Apple – one that the company must digitally sign so that the iPhone “trusts” it, and then use to take customers’ information. Technologist Dan Guido at the Trail of Bits blog christened the software “FBiOS”.

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s no reason they wouldn’t be able to do it again and again, for every operating system, for every software company in the country, if it’s established that the government has the authority to compel a company to manufacture a product that undermines its own security. Even if you’re not an iPhone user, the company that makes your phone or computer would have trouble defending itself if the FBI decided to sue it for a password bypasser.

Can’t Apple just make my phone so secure no one can get into it, not even Apple?

It’s trying. But that would probably require security to be hard-wired into the device, which means a single flaw could render an entire line of devices effectively worthless, since no software update could fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why is Apple willing to fight this battle?

Apple (and others) have said that the court order is not merely shortsighted but dangerous. Apple operates internationally on the guarantee of user privacy; the terms of the FBI’s demands will look downright generous compared to what Russia and China would probably ask Apple to do if it capitulates.

Who’s going to win?

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a toss-up. Tech companies, technologists and liberal politicians are firmly on Apple’s side; conservative politicians and law enforcement professionals who have seen horrific cybercrimes have taken the opposite view.

Related: Google, WhatsApp and Snowden back Apple against FBI

“Many mobile forensics examiners, including myself, know that what is at stake is not just the San Bernardino case but a growing backlog of criminal cases – some involving suspected child abusers or terrorists – that cannot proceed because of Apple’s defiance in assisting law enforcement,” wrote Pace University forensic cybersecurity expert Darren R Hayes .

Senator Ron Wyden, who has long championed robust encryption, said the debate shouldn’t be overwhelmed by emotion. “Some are calling for the United States to weaken Americans’ cybersecurity by undermining strong encryption with backdoors for the government,” he wrote on Medium on Friday afternoon. “But security experts have shown again and again that weakening encryption will make it easier for foreign hackers, criminals and spies to break into Americans’ bank accounts, health records and phones, without preventing terrorists from ‘going dark’.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2016

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s economic ‘brain trust’ ridiculed as America braces for a trade war recession: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump appears unprepared to deal with a potential recession, the Associated Press reported Friday.

"Facing a trade war against China that has shaken the global economy, President Donald Trump gathered his most trusted economic aides in the Oval Office," the AP reported. "The assembled brain trust for Friday’s urgent consultations included an economics chief best known for his stint as a cable TV commentator; a trade adviser whose pro-tariff views are outside the economic mainstream; and a treasury secretary (joining by phone on his way back from vacation) who made millions off the housing crisis and then turned to financing Hollywood movies."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

ICE and Homeland Security busted pushing right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories

Published

on

Donald Trump in Oval Office

Multiple federal departments have been pushing far-right propaganda to federal employees.

"An arm of the Justice Department regularly sent summaries and links to articles from an online white nationalist publication over the last year, a BuzzFeed News investigation has found. In addition, similar newsletters sent to the Labor Department, ICE, HUD and the Department of Homeland Security, included links and content from hyperpartisan and conspiracy-oriented publishers," BuzzFeed News reported Friday.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump claimed North Korea missile testing ‘would stop’ — but they just launched again: report

Published

on

The upcoming G7 summit meeting in Bairritz, France will have one more issue to grapple with after North Korea reportedly conducted missile tests.

"South Korea's military confirms that North Korea has launched a projectile this morning. From South Hamgyong Province. Japan's government reported it first," Voice of America Seoul bureau chief William Gallo Tweeted Friday.

"North Korea has now conducted nine rounds of launches since early May. But this one's notable because it comes after Trump says Kim promised "this testing would stop when the exercises end." They did end Tuesday. And yet..." he noted.

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image