Quantcast
Connect with us

Anti-choice activists fight for abortion laws — but not for abused babies like this

Published

on

State legislatures have issued an onslaught of anti-choice and forced birth bills over the last several months. States like Oklahoma and South Carolina passed some of the most severe. Other states are passing insane bills under the guise of being anti-choice, like Kansas’s human-animal hybrids legislation. But when it comes to children who have faced abuse, one father is saying there is no justice thanks to an Oregon court ruling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joshua Marbury and his wife came home after a date-night to find their 1-year-old son Jacob screaming and covered in bruises while his babysitter lay asleep on the sofa. The parents went to the police, but nothing was done, according to Oregon Live.

Doctors told Marbury that baby Jacob had bruises that matched hand prints and that the abuse could have even killed the child. Without recourse from the authorities, he took to Facebook with his story, earning over 200,000 shares in just a few days.

“Something needs to be done,” Marbury wrote. “NOBODY can just hit a child and more to just get away with it because the child (can’t) verbally tell you.”

Marbury is referencing a 2012 Oregon Court of Appeals ruling that made it difficult for prosecutors to file charges in child abuse cases because victims can’t speak or testify.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The first thing I saw was a black eye,” she said. “I thought maybe marker got on his face or something. When he turned over, his whole right side of his face — black and blue.”

The photos also show marks on the little boy’s ear and arms. Despite the photos and the police report, the family found out there would be no prosecution.

Washington County Deputy District Attorney Dustin Staten’s only comment was to email a story titled “Even pets are better protected than young kids under Oregon abuse laws, prosecutors say.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Prosecutors must prove that the victim suffered a “physical injury” under Oregon law if they intend to convict a person of assault or child mistreatment. Thus, the prosecution has to prove the child experienced “substantial pain.”

South Carolina’s latest anti-choice law alleges that abortions should be illegal because a fetus can feel the pain associated with the abortion.

Marbury’s full comments can be seen below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump polling close friends over whether he should fire Mulvaney: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump is considering firing Mick Mulvaney, his acting White House chief of staff and director of the Office of Management and Budget, The Atlantic reported Friday.

"Mick Mulvaney's job was in danger even before his disastrous press conference yesterday, and his equally disastrous attempt to walk that performance back," The Atlantic reported. "The fumble could not have been more poorly timed: According to multiple current and former White House officials, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to relay private conversations, Trump has been steadily souring on Mulvaney for weeks."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Michael Moore predicts Mick Mulvaney will get into Heaven after confessing Trump’s quid pro quo

Published

on

Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore predicted acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney will ascend to Heaven in the afterlife during a Friday interview on MSNBC's "The Beat" with Ari Melber.

The host played a clip of Mulvaney admitting Trump's quid pro quo while seeking foreign election assistance from Ukraine.

"This man obviously is going to be admitted into Heaven," Moore said. "You know, he told the truth."

"If there was a movie version of this, somebody stuck him with a needle just before he walked out onto the stage there, a truth serum needle, and he just went on and on saying, 'Yeah, that’s what we do. Yeah, of course.' Essentially admitting there is a quid pro quo. In fact, there are many quid pro quos."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump campaign has 12-person ‘War Room’ toiling to fight the impeachment inquiry: report

Published

on

While the White House has bragged about refusing to start a "war room" to deal with the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's administration, his campaign is footing the bill for a 12-person operation, the LA Times reported Friday.

“Some of you have criticized us for not having a war room — OK? — which we don’t by the way,” acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told reporters.

“You don’t have a war room when you haven’t done anything wrong," he added.

By that logic, Trump's 2020 re-election campaign may fear the president did something wrong.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image