Quantcast
Connect with us

Anti-choice activists fight for abortion laws — but not for abused babies like this

Published

on

State legislatures have issued an onslaught of anti-choice and forced birth bills over the last several months. States like Oklahoma and South Carolina passed some of the most severe. Other states are passing insane bills under the guise of being anti-choice, like Kansas’s human-animal hybrids legislation. But when it comes to children who have faced abuse, one father is saying there is no justice thanks to an Oregon court ruling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joshua Marbury and his wife came home after a date-night to find their 1-year-old son Jacob screaming and covered in bruises while his babysitter lay asleep on the sofa. The parents went to the police, but nothing was done, according to Oregon Live.

Doctors told Marbury that baby Jacob had bruises that matched hand prints and that the abuse could have even killed the child. Without recourse from the authorities, he took to Facebook with his story, earning over 200,000 shares in just a few days.

“Something needs to be done,” Marbury wrote. “NOBODY can just hit a child and more to just get away with it because the child (can’t) verbally tell you.”

Marbury is referencing a 2012 Oregon Court of Appeals ruling that made it difficult for prosecutors to file charges in child abuse cases because victims can’t speak or testify.

“The first thing I saw was a black eye,” she said. “I thought maybe marker got on his face or something. When he turned over, his whole right side of his face — black and blue.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The photos also show marks on the little boy’s ear and arms. Despite the photos and the police report, the family found out there would be no prosecution.

Washington County Deputy District Attorney Dustin Staten’s only comment was to email a story titled “Even pets are better protected than young kids under Oregon abuse laws, prosecutors say.”

Prosecutors must prove that the victim suffered a “physical injury” under Oregon law if they intend to convict a person of assault or child mistreatment. Thus, the prosecution has to prove the child experienced “substantial pain.”

ADVERTISEMENT

South Carolina’s latest anti-choice law alleges that abortions should be illegal because a fetus can feel the pain associated with the abortion.

Marbury’s full comments can be seen below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Why do we need camo in space’: Trump’s Space Force ridiculed for woodland camouflage uniforms

Published

on

On Friday, the United States Space Force released an image of their new uniforms on Twitter.

The image shows a Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) for a four-star general in a woodland camouflage pattern, with a matching camo nametape.

https://twitter.com/SpaceForceDoD/status/1218335200964464650

However, many people were confused as to why the Space Force would use uniforms designed to blend in on earth.

Here's some of what people were saying:

https://twitter.com/PostCultRev/status/1218351691021484032

Sorry for the question but why do we need camo in space?

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

BUSTED: National Archives caught doctoring exhibit to remove criticism of President Trump from women

Published

on

The National Archives were caught editing an artifact from the Trump administration to remove criticism of the president, according to a bombshell new report in The Washington Post.

The newspaper reported on a "large color photograph" at the National Archives exhibit marking the centennial of women's suffrage.

"The 49-by-69-inch photograph is a powerful display. Viewed from one perspective, it shows the 2017 march. Viewed from another angle, it shifts to show a 1913 black-and-white image of a women’s suffrage march also on Pennsylvania Avenue. The display links momentous demonstrations for women’s rights more than a century apart on the same stretch of pavement. But a closer look reveals a different story," the newspaper noted.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Dershowitz is running a ‘bizarro defense’ of Trump: Harvard Law colleague says ‘Alan is just completely wacko’

Published

on

Two of the most famous names associated with Harvard Law School had competing appearances on MSNBC on Friday.

It began when Alan Dershowitz, a professor emeritus, was interviewed MSNBC chief legal correspondent Ari Melber about his new role officially representing President Donald Trump during the Senate impeachment trial.

Dershowitz claimed that neither abuse of power nor obstruction of Congress count as "high crimes" under the constitution.

Professor Alan Dershowitz, who has also been associated with Harvard Law for five decades, was asked about Dershowitz's argument during an interview with Chris Hayes.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image