Quantcast
Connect with us

Pam Geller’s anti-Islam group sues DOJ over law protecting online free speech

Published

on

Anti-Muslim activist Pamela Geller is spearheading a lawsuit against the Justice Department to stop it from enforcing a federal law designed to protect free speech on the Internet.

Courthouse News Service reports that several anti-Muslim groups, lead by Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative, filed a lawsuit on July 13 in Washington, claiming that a section of the Communications Decency Act actually limits free expression online. The complaint specifically blames US Attorney General Loretta Lynch for censoring posts that criticize Muslims on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

Section 320 of the statute, known as the “Good Samaritan” provision, states:  “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

Courthouse News Service says the law is intended to shield online platforms — from major online publications to personal blogs — from any legal liability for user-generated content. But AFDI thinks that Section 320 can be distorted for sinister purposes, saying that it allows social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to “engage in government-sanctioned discrimination and the suppression of free speech.”

Geller, AFDI’s co-founder and president, is a right wing political activist and commentator who the Southern Poverty Law Center calls “the anti-Muslim movement’s most visible and flamboyant figurehead.” According to the SPLC, Geller has spent more than a decade crusading against the religion of Islam, having won media infamy in 2009 for her opposition to the construction of an Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero of the 9/11 attacks in New York.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since then, Geller and AFDI vice president Robert Spencer have won notoriety for their anti-Muslim rhetoric. Courthouse News Service states that their group is most well-known for plastering “buses with posters that depict all Muslims as terrorists,” and for claiming all Muslims are anti-Semitic on their respective blogs, Atlas Shrugs and Jihad Watch.

AFDI’s legal complaint centers around similar anti-Muslim posts that were censored by major social media sites. According to CNS, the 25-page document includes screenshots of posts that Geller claims Facebook took down for being “hate speech,” and violating the social networking site’s “community standards.”

One of the screenshots is a meme featuring a protester holding a sign that reads, “Death to all Juice,” and the attached caption, “Islamic Jew-Hatred: It’s in the Qur’an.”

ADVERTISEMENT

CNS reports that AFDI’s lawsuit even lists one of Geller conspiracy theories, namely that  Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal purchased $300 million of Twitter stock in order for the royal to impose “sharia blasphemy strictures” over Twitter.

Geller’s and Spencer’s lawsuit doesn’t specifically target social media companies. Rather, it demands a court order preventing Attorney General Lynch from enforcing the law’s “Good Samaritan” provision.

But civil liberties lawyers and digital rights groups disagree with AFDI’s claims that Section 320 violates free speech. In a phone interview with CNS, Emma Llanso, attorney and free expression director at Center for Democracy and Technology, argued the statute, is “as important as the First Amendment to defending free speech online.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a prominent online free speech group, further agreed that Section 320 is the “most important statute in protecting online speech,” stating on its site that, “Rather than face potential liability for their users’ actions, “most sites would likely not host any user content at all or would need to protect themselves by being actively engaged in censoring what we say, what we see, and what we do online.”


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].

Send confidential news tips to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Employee at Tim Hortons slurs Muslim couple and tells them ‘go back to your own country’

Published

on

According to a report from Deadline Detroit, a Muslim advocacy group has filed a complaint against a local Tim Horton's location after an employee insulted a Muslim couple and told them to "go back to their own country," followed by a sexist slur.

The report states Alaa Kouider and her husband, Ameur Dhaimini, were purchasing coffee at the local fast food location when they got into an argument with the cashier.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Former New Hampshire GOP chair: Trump is using ‘the worst kind of racism’ to tear America apart

Published

on

President Donald Trump this past week ratcheted up racist rhetoric against four Democratic women of color, culminating in chants of "send her back" directed at Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) during a Trump rally on Wednesday night.

Jennifer Horn, the former chairwoman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, has written an editorial for USA Today in which she laments the fact that the entire Republican Party has been transformed by Trump into a "racist, nationalist movement" that she believes is tearing the country apart.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Immigration expert explains why Trump’s migrant policy won’t work

Published

on

After President Trump let the audience at his rally in Greenville, North Carolina, shout "send her back!" after he falsely accused Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) of anti-Semitism, Republicans grew nervous about a backlash -- that this time, Trump had gone too far.

But the incident merely caps years of severe and inhumane rhetoric and policy targeting migrants. Raw Story spoke with Stephen Yale-Loehr, Professor of Immigration Law Practice at Cornell Law School, about why Trump and the GOP are enacting inhumane policies that won't even work to accomplish their goals.

Raw Story: In modern history, has anyone actually managed to shut down migration successfully or is Trump enacting all these vicious policies for nothing really? It seems like people who want to migrate really can't be stopped?

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image