Quantcast
Connect with us

Banning of Twitter ‘troll’ Milo Yiannopoulos ignites debate over corporate limitations on speech

Published

on

Twitter was embroiled in controversy Wednesday after banning an editor at the conservative Breitbart website for fueling a stream of abuse that drove “Ghostbusters” star Leslie Jones to quit the social network.

The ban on Milo Yiannopoulos, the website’s tech editor known for provocative posts, sparked protests from his supporters but praise from others, while triggering debate over free speech on social media.

ADVERTISEMENT

A hashtag war erupted between Yiannopoulos supporters united by the banner #FreeMilo and his critics — who rallied under #LoveForLeslieJ.

Yiannopoulos hit back at the ban saying “Twitter has confirmed itself as a safe space for Muslim terrorists and Black Lives Matter extremists, but a no-go zone for conservatives.”

The suspension came a day after Jones, who is African American, said she was leaving Twitter after being bombarded by Internet trolls likening her to an ape among other racist slurs.

“I leave Twitter tonight with tears and a very sad heart. All this cause I did a movie. You can hate the movie but the shit I got today… wrong,” the “Saturday Night Live” comedian and actress said late Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey responded with a tweet to Jones saying he was “following” and asking her to contact him directly.

Yiannopoulos’s Twitter account, which had more than 338,000 followers, was later blocked.

“People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter,” the company said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online.”

– Free speech, hate speech –

Critics of Yiannopoulos said he incited his followers to bombard the actress with racial comments, while his supporters claimed he was targeted for his views.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commenting on a tweet in which Jones said she had been called an ape, and “received a pic with semen on my face,” Yiannopoulos responded:

“If at first you don’t succeed (because your work is terrible”, play the victim. EVERYONE GETS HATE MAIL FFS.”

His tweet reportedly triggered a torrent of abuse towards the 48-year-old “Ghostbusters” star who responded by taking screenshots and retweeting the slurs, saying they had made her “numb.”

ADVERTISEMENT

After being subjected to hours of harassment from Yiannopoulos’s supporters, Jones called him out: “@Nero you can say what you want about my work but when you support hate, that’s not right. Wonder do your readers know you support hate!!”

Twitter’s actions were set to further intensify a simmering debate on how social media platforms regulate offensive or inappropriate conduct.

One Twitter user, Sara Levine, welcomed the ban on Yiannopoulos, tweeting, “Racists shouldn’t be allowed to silence others.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But Twitter user John Nolte responded, “Basically, the corporate fascists at @Twitter silenced someone for criticizing and mocking a rich and powerful movie star.”

Both Twitter and Facebook have banned thousands of suspected jihadists for seeking to incite or celebrate violence, and have targeted users for harassment and insults.

But the platforms have been navigating a fine line, staying open to controversial views while keeping out violent or abusive content.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matthew Ingram, a Fortune magazine writer who blogs for the Nieman Journalism Lab, suggested that this time, Twitter may have gone too far.

“I know this isn’t going to be a popular opinion, but I don’t think Milo said anything to Leslie Jones that deserves a permanent ban,” Ingram tweeted.

– A ‘learning moment’ –

ADVERTISEMENT

Some analysts argue that social media platforms need to develop a code that mirrors constitutional free speech rights.

“Corporate platforms have, in many ways, taken on the role of the town square, or public sphere,” said a blog post this year from Jillian York, a writer and activist who works with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“It is impossible to ignore the effect corporate limitations on speech can have on societies.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which seeks to combat racism, maintained that social media firms have a right to set their own standards.

“These aren’t First Amendment (constitutional) questions at all. Twitter and others are private corporations that have no obligation to allow these kinds of speech,” Potok told AFP.

Potok said the lack of any policy led to chaos at the online service Reddit, which he said “turned into a hellhole for anyone who wasn’t a hater” before it implemented guidelines.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If these organizations say they have a no-hate policy, they ought to enforce it,” he said.

Jennifer Lambe, a University of Delaware professor of communications specializing in free speech issues, said there is no easy answer for social networks.

“They can do whatever they want, but there could be a backlash if they start censoring things right and left,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Danielle Citron, a University of Maryland law professor and author of a book “Hate Crimes in Cyberspace,” called the incident “a learning moment.”

“I applaud Twitter for its approach in this area,” Citron said. “If you chase people offline with racist and intimidating speech, that’s too much. Twitter and other platforms are contributing to social norms on free expression.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Elementary school cheer squad parents raffling off an AM-15 automatic weapon as a fundraiser

Published

on

Just weeks after a mass shooting in Dayton, Ohio killed nine people, only 200 miles away in Richmond, the cheer squad is selling raffle tickets to sell a semi-automatic gun.

Fox19 reported Wednesday that the Junior Lions Cheer Team have infuriated Heather Chilton, who's 7-year-old daughter is on the squad for the first time.

"This is absurd, you're having elementary kids sell your AR-15. Why?" Chilton said. "I highly doubt that something would happen with the gun, but say it did. Say one of the kids in the high school got a hold of it — got the AR-15 or AM-15 and shot up a school with it, and I'm the one that sold the raffle ticket to his dad?"

Continue Reading

Facebook

I think Trump’s people sit around ‘thinking up new ways to be cruel’: Senator

Published

on

On Wednesday's edition of MSNBC's "All In," Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) tore into the Trump administration for its treatment of migrant children, as yet more reports come in of children being denied basic services in squalid conditions, and as Trump considers ways to get around the federal consent decree placing limits on how long they can be detained.

"We already know from so many child specialists that detaining children in these kinds of facilities does irreparable damage to them," said Hirono. "There are alternatives to family detention this administration could care less about ... the only way to get around the consent agreement is by getting around it by proposing or having this rule, which will be immediately challenged. They want to detain families indefinitely, children indefinitely, held in situations that do them absolutely no good when there are alternatives."

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Maddow: You have to watch what the lying White House does — and not what they say

Published

on

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow opened her show with a quick assessment of her thoughts on the ridiculous that the president of the United States regurgitated into the mouths of his supporters Wednesday.

She began by noting that they don't do press briefings at the White House anymore; instead, they've turned to talking to the president directly as he enters or exits the building to go off on his campaign trips or vacations.

"Today the president held a long one of these," she said. "One of the ones where he tried to push everyone's buttons, the president is denouncing the prime minister of our allied Denmark. He's calling her nasty. That will get some headlines. The president attacked American Jews for a second straight day today, saying they have dual loyalty because they're Jews. Americans of other religions don't have that dual loyalty or his suspicions of dual loyalty, Jewish-Americans do, because of their religion."

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image