Donald Trump’s national campaign spokesperson insisted on Tuesday that the GOP presidential nominee was not trying to incite violence against Hillary Clinton earlier in the day with his suggestion that “Second Amendment people” could stop her.
“Everyone knows Hillary Clinton is a gun-grabber,” Katrina Pierson told CNN host Jake Tapper. “And everyone knows that if she’s in a position to appoint Supreme Court justices, she will do everything she can to remove the Second Amendment. So Mr. Trump was clearly pointing that out, as he has done every day on the campaign trail.”
The former reality TV star was quickly criticized by both Democrats and fellow conservatives after saying at a North Carolina campaign rally, “If she gets to pick her [Supreme Court] judges, nothing you can do folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is.”
“He was talking about what Second Amendment activists could do to stop her — if she won — to stop her from appointing a gun-control nominee to the Supreme Court,” Tapper told Bowden. “It wasn’t about November … It’s not about November, it’s after November.”
“That’s actually not what he was talking about. Just before that he was saying — as you said — ‘what could happen.’ He doesn’t want that to happen,” she replied. “And in order to stop that, people that support their Second Amendment rights need to come together and get out there and stop Hillary Clinton from winning in November.”
When Tapper asked why Trump did not just simply say he misspoke following the uproar, Pierson said a statement from his campaign saying that he was actually referring to the “power of unification” inherent in the Second Amendment provided enough clarification.
However, conservative analyst Ana Navarro had a less charitable take on Trump’s remarks, saying that he could not grasp the influence he now has in an inflamed political climate.
“It sounded like yet another stupid thing that comes out of Trump’s mouth,” she said. “It sounded like, ‘Oh my God, here we go again, it’s Groundhog Day.’ Just when I thought he might be shifting into policy with that speech yesterday, here we’re all gonna have to react to yet another stupid, undisciplined thing that Donald Trump said because he seems not to understand the power of words.”
Democratic strategist Paul Begala said that, while reasonable people were right to be incensed by Trump’s statement, he worried about how someone who is unreasonable would take it.
“I fear that an unbalanced person hears that — as Ana points out, in an inflamed environment — and God forbid, thinks that that was a threat,” he said. “I certainly take it as a threat, and Trump needs to apologize.”
Watch the discussion, as posted online, below.
Trump approves of North Korea missile tests: ‘I have no problem’ because they’re just ‘short-range missiles’
On Thursday, in conversation with reporters, President Donald Trump said that he had 'no problem' with North Korea's new round of missile tests.
"Short-range missiles, we never made an agreement on that," said Trump. "I have no problem, we'll see what happens, but these are short-range missiles. They're very standard."
The thought that short-range missiles would still be capable of hitting our allies in the region, like South Korea and Japan, does not seem to have occurred to him.
Trump says he has "no problem" with North Korea testing missiles because they are just "short-range missiles" that are "very standard." pic.twitter.com/fdKtQ6yrBE
Russian Twitter propaganda predicted 2016 US election polls
But one conclusion was unequivocal: Russia unleashed an extensive campaign of fake news and disinformation on social media with the aim of distorting U.S. public opinion, sowing discord and swinging the election in favor of the Republican candidate Donald Trump.
Beto O’Rourke calls for a ‘war tax’ in release of health care plan for veterans
The Democratic presidential candidate uses his eighth policy announcement to focus on an area that he prioritized in Congress.
Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke on Monday morning released a plan to improve the lives of veterans, returning to an area of priority during his time in the U.S. House for his latest 2020 policy rollout.
In keeping with measures he supported in Congress, the plan calls for a "responsible end" to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — reinvesting $1 out of every $2 saved in veterans programs — and the creation of a Veterans Health Care Trust Fund for each future war. The fund would be paid for by a "war tax" on households without service members or veterans.