Quantcast
Connect with us

Secret CIA analysis nails Russia for trying to help Trump win: report

Published

on

A secret CIA assessment concluded the reason Russia interfered with the 2016 election was not simply to stoke chaos and undermine faith in the U.S. electoral system, as some have argued, but to explicitly help Donald Trump win the presidency, the Washington Post reports.

President Obama Friday ordered a full report on Russian efforts to influence the election, due before the president leaves office on January 20. President’s successor Donald Trump, who’s reportedly only receiving one intelligence briefing per week, has said he doesn’t believe the Russians interfered with the election, instead suggesting reports to the contrary are the result of partisan politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

(READ MORE: ‘He’s trying to undercut’ US intel: WaPo reporter hits Trump Team’s response on Russian interference)

“We may have crossed into a new threshold, and it is incumbent upon us to take stock of that, to review, to conduct some after-action, to understand what has happened and to impart some lessons learned,” Lisa Monaco, Obama’s counterterrorism and homeland security adviser, said of the review at a breakfast for the Christian Science Monitor.

He’s not the only one. During a briefing laying out U.S. agency evidence of Russia’s involvement, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) reportedly “raise doubt about the underlying intelligence,” insisting would regard any public challenge based on the actions “an act of partisan politics,” the Post reports.

“I’ll be the first one to come out and point at Russia if there’s clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence—even now,” Trump transition team member Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) told the Post. “There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Part of that circumstantial evidence is a tweet sent Friday by Wikileaks purported to admit some guilt on the part of the transparency website. Wikileaks posted a link to an article about Obama’s full report request and asked for donations from readers. The CNN article it posted made no mention of WikiLeaks at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wikileaks is the website responsible with publishing hacked emails from Hillary Clinton aide John Podesta, releasing damning DNC information during the general election campaign. For his part, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said the source of the Clinton campaign emails was “not state parties.”

Despite what McConnell, Trump and other Republicans may say, a senior U.S. official told the Post it’s clear the Russians hoped to help Trump over Clinton. “It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” a senior U.S. official said. “That’s the consensus view.”

In a statement Friday, the Trump campaign addressed the report, insisting, “it’s now time to move on”:

ADVERTISEMENT

“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.'”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump Jr. and McGahn didn’t testify before the Mueller grand jury — and a federal judge wants to know why

Published

on

During the Russia investigation, former special counsel Robert Mueller sought testimony from a long list of people. But according to a court filing on Sunday, two people who Mueller did not force to testify before a grand jury were Donald Trump Jr. and former White House Counsel Don McGahn. And U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wants to know why.

The court filing on Sunday, according to The Week, was in response to a ruling Howell made on Thursday — when Howell asserted that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was withholding too much information from the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York. The House Judiciary Committee, The Week’s Peter Weber reports, has been “wrangling” with DOJ over the evidence that Mueller obtained during his lengthy investigation.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Internet rains hell on Trump for comparing his impeachment to a ‘lynching’: ‘How dare you’

Published

on

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump furiously took time Twitter, blasting the effort to impeach him over the Ukraine scandal as a "lynching" and threatening that a future Republican Congress will cook up charges against a Democratic president.

Trump's outburst did not impress many commenters on social media, who quickly dogpiled him in criticism and mockery:

You are seriously comparing your impeachment to hate crimes against African-Americans?

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Corrupt Ukraine oligarch has enlisted Trump allies to help with defense

Published

on

A Ukrainian oligarch fighting extradition to the U.S. has aligned his legal strategy to match President Donald Trump's, and even hired two attorneys associated with the president and Rudy Giuliani.

Dmytro Firtash is wanted in the United States on bribery and related charges, and he hired pro-Trump attorneys Joseph DiGenova and Victoria Toensing to help paint his prosecution as part of a global conspiracy involving Joe Biden, reported the Wall Street Journal.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image