Naval War College prof explains how Trump’s ‘stress’ tweets are a roadmap for America’s enemies
Of the many revelations from former acting Attorney General Sally Yates’ Senate hearing on May 8, Naval War College professor Tom Nichols said in a series of tweets that President Donald Trump’s response might have been the most interesting.
The 14-tweet-long thread begins with Nichols explaining his background as a “Sovietologist”, and how he “would have given anything for Andropov or Gorbachev to give me a running narrative of their mood and inner thoughts in real time” the way Trump appears to have done with his tweets about Yates following her testimony.
He went on to say that the president’s Twitter feed “is basically a raw feed of POTUS thoughts to foreign analysts” because they are “pieces of the president’s moods and thoughts that day”.
“This only occurred to me today as I realized how easily POTUS tweets were giving me a minute by minute image of his reactions to Yates,” Nichols tweeted, and then added “this is the kind of instant leadership portrait that I wouldn’t want a foreign nation to have when gaming out a crisis with us.”
“It is, from a foreign intel analyst’s viewpoint, in some ways probably more valuable than classified memos,” Nichols tweeted. “It’s real and instant.”
He said Trump’s tweets broadcast “how the President reacts under stress,” which is “something you never want the enemy to know”. Nevertheless, Nichols tweeted, “it’s all out there, every day”.
After an aside about “how the President processes information” and how valuable that kind of information can be, he completed the thread by saying that while it’s not his place to “tell the President how to communicate,” he finds “hugely dangerous in revealing real-time POTUS reactions”.
Read Nichols’ entire thread below.
I am often astonished at the President’s tweets, and how he calls media in his own country as “fake news.” But there’s something else /1
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
ADVERTISEMENT
I was a Sovietologist back in the day. I was constantly trying to unpack what I thought was happening behind the Kremlin’s walls. /2
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
I would have given anything for Andropov or Gorbachev to give me a running narrative of their mood and inner thoughts in real time. /3
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
As an analyst, including my time years ago as a CIA consultant doing research in the 80s, I’d have considered that a gold mine. /4
ADVERTISEMENT— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
And I wonder if, and or how, anyone is considering the fact that this is basically a raw feed of POTUS thoughts to foreign analysts. /5
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
ADVERTISEMENT
Because while none of the matters are classified – at least AFAIK – tweets are pieces of the president’s moods and thoughts that day. /6
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
This only occurred to me today as I realized how easily POTUS tweets were giving me a minute by minute image of his reactions to Yates. /7
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
This is the kind of instant leadership portrait that I wouldn’t want a foreign nation to have when gaming out a crisis with us. /8
ADVERTISEMENT— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
Americans might well appreciate the candor. But I thought Obama did too much thinking out loud in front of cameras. This is far more. /9
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
ADVERTISEMENT
It is, from a foreign intel analyst’s viewpoint, in some ways probably more valuable than classified memos. It’s real and instant. /10
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
It shows how the President reacts under stress. It’s something you never want the enemy to know. And yet it’s all out there, every day. /11
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
It’s also a window into how the President processes information – or how he doesn’t process info he doesn’t like. Solid gold info. /12
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
These are all things I would have given anything to know, even just a fraction of this, in an analysis of any Soviet or Russia leader. /13
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
It’s not for me to tell the President how to communicate. But I find something hugely dangerous in revealing real-time POTUS reactions. /14x
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 9, 2017
Breaking Banner
Hope Hicks told Congress that Trump has cut her out of his life — he virtually never calls her anymore
Former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks was broadly considered to be one of President Donald Trump's favorite staffers.
But when she left the administration in 2018, the president virtually cut off ties to her, and has only spoken with her five times since then, according to the transcript of the closed-door hearing in the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday:
In her interview, Hope Hicks says she has only spoken to Trump between five and ten times since she left the White House in February 2018. (He used to call that much in a day.) They last spoke in April, when they had dinner. Our story from yesterday:https://t.co/3gzVY21c3z pic.twitter.com/VMZqhnbgib
In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Federal Elections Commission is warning that there is already foreign intrusion in the U.S. campaigns.
FEC chair Ellen L. Weintraub was forced to issue a statement after President Donald Trump said that he wasn't sure what he would do if a foreign government approached him with "dirt" on his political opponent. He said that he "might" tell the FBI but would likely hear what they had to say. He said that it wasn't illegal, but Weintraub issued a statement reiterating that it is illegal.
"I am particularly concerned about the risk of illicit funds and foreign support influencing our political system. Foreign dark money represents a significant vulnerability for American democracy. We do not know the extent to which our political campaigns receive foreign dark money, but we do know that the political money can be weaponized by well-funded hostile powers," the letter warned.
Breaking Banner
Trump’s anti-abortion rule attacking Planned Parenthood can go into effect in 49 states: appeals court
According to the Associated Press, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday that President Donald Trump's domestic "gag rule" can take effect while litigation proceeds, potentially making it far harder for low-income women to access abortion care.
District judges in California, Oregon, and Washington previously blocked the rule from taking effect. But a three-judge panel in San Francisco today said that the rule was "reasonable" as an interpretation of federal law, and lifted the injunction preventing it from being enforced. The rule can now take effect in every state except Maryland, where another federal judge's order has still enjoined the policy.
Wall Street Journal issues blistering editorial asking Trump what the point is of a second term
Fireworks erupt at latest Mueller hearing as chairman Jerry Nadler schools GOP’s Jim Jordan
Matt Gaetz gets laughed at after his attempt to derail Mueller hearing hilariously backfires
‘Come heavily armed’: Oregon GOP lawmaker threatens state troopers over dispute with Dem governor
Andrew McCabe rains hell on ‘insanely stupid’ Trump in epic rant before calling for impeachment hearings
Roger Stone ‘is going to jail’: Ex-prosecutor explains how it could blow open the legal case against Trump
Hope Hicks admitted she didn’t ask Trump if hush payments happened — before public denial during the 2016 election
BUSTED: Walmart to pay $282 million federal investigators to settle bribery probes
Hope Hicks told Congress that Trump has cut her out of his life — he virtually never calls her anymore
Hope Hicks called Trump’s plan for Jeff Sessions ‘odd’ — but White House lawyers blocked her from elaborating why
Roger Stone ‘is going to jail’: Ex-prosecutor explains how it could blow open the legal case against Trump
Hope Hicks called Trump’s plan for Jeff Sessions ‘odd’ — but White House lawyers blocked her from elaborating why
Chuck Schumer caught on tape doing a happy dance leaving the White House — what does it mean for war with Iran?
Trump ‘lit his own house on fire’ by pulling out of Iran nuclear deal: International relations expert
