Quantcast
Connect with us

A psychiatrist uses the Army’s field manual to show how Trump is mentally unfit to be president

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s mental fitness for the office of the presidency has been regularly debated among psychiatric professionals, and now one psychiatrist has gone so far as to consult the U.S. Army’s own field manual to show just how unfit Trump is for the job.

In an editorial for the Los Angeles Times, psychiatrist Prudence L. Gourguechon reviews the field manual’s descriptions of what it takes to be an effective leader in the army and finds that Trump seems to be sorely lacking in all of the key traits.

ADVERTISEMENT

As outlined by Gourguechon, the main traits of successful military leaders are the ability to establish trust, the discipline to control your impulses, the ability to think critically, a capacity for self-awareness and reflection, and the willingness to empathize with other people.

Touching on self-discipline, Gourguechon notes that the field manual describes an undisciplined leader as someone who reacts “viscerally or angrily when receiving bad news or conflicting information” and “allows personal emotions to drive decisions or guide responses to emotionally charged situations.”

This certainly seems to apply to Trump, who is often unable to stop himself from rushing to Twitter with angry reactions to bad news, as he did on Thursday this week when he again described independent counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into him as a “witch hunt.”

Additionally, the field manual says a leader who lacks self-awareness often “unfairly blames subordinates when failures are experienced” and “rejects or lacks interest in feedback.”

Assorted leaks from White House staffers have revealed that Trump regularly casts blame at subordinates for problems that he himself creates, as seen recently in reports that Trump has put Chief of Staff Reince Priebus on notice that he’ll be fired if he can’t stop Trump’s own White House from being dysfunctional and factional — despite the fact that it’s Trump who has encouraged rivalries within the West Wing.

ADVERTISEMENT

And finally, the manual explains that a leader who lacks empathy often “shows a lack of concern for others’ emotional distress” and “displays an inability to take another’s perspective.”

In the past, Trump has regularly mocked opponents for their appearances, most famously when he ridiculed a disabled reporter during the 2016 presidential campaign. Added to this, Trump has never apologized to anyone for saying cruel things about them.

In summing up her findings, Gourguechon encourages us all to carefully read over the Army field manual’s traits of effective leadership and decide for ourselves whether Trump meets any of them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Because of Trump’s Twitter habits and other features of the contemporary media landscape, far more data about his behavior are available to everyone — to citizens, journalists and members of Congress,” she writes. “And we are all free to compare that observable behavior to the list of traits deemed critical for leadership by the U.S. Army.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Devin Nunes’ income called into question as watchdog asks for investigation of his finances

Published

on

According to a report from the Fresno Bee,the non-partisan Campaign Legal Center is requesting a federal investigation into whether U.S. Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) is receiving legal services in violation of House ethics rules.

Over the past year, the conservative Republicans has launched a handful of lawsuits against critics -- including the McClatchy newspaper chain and a person on Twitter purporting to be one of his cows.

According to the Bee, "The complaint says Nunes appears to be in 'blatant violation of House rules,' because he would have trouble paying for all these lawsuits solely from his congressional salary of $174,000 per year. The group argues he’d only be able to pay if he received legal services for free, at a discounted rate, or based on a contingency fee, meaning the lawyer would get compensated from Nunes’ winnings if he prevails in his lawsuits."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

$1,750+ ticket prices for South Carolina debate spark outrage

Published

on

"I think it speaks to the fundamental, endemic corruption of the Democratic Party establishment that you had to pay... multiple thousands of dollars to get into that room."

Unusually loud booing and jeering directed disproportionately at Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren during Tuesday night's Democratic presidential debate—particularly when the senators criticized billionaire businessman Michael Bloomberg—sparked probing questions about the class composition of the audience packed inside the Gaillard Center in Charleston, South Carolina.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Ex-GOP senator hammers lawmakers quaking in their boots out of fear of Trump: ‘Why are you there?’

Published

on

Appearing on CNN on Wednesday morning, retired Sen. William Cohen (R-ME) hammered members of his own party still sitting in the Senate who refuse to take on Donald Trump, saying they are failing the country and themselves by standing by in fear.

Speaking with CNN hosts Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto, Cohen said kowtowing to the president is nothing new, but has grown worse over the past ten years.

"Some of it has to do with external pressures, that of social media, talk radio, specific channels that have a particular view and then hammer that view home to the constituents who then pressure the members of Congress," he explained. "But you have to ask yourself: Why are you a senator? Why are you there? Are you acting out of sheer fear that if you speak up and take a position that's controversial you'll be punished?"

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image