Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said experts were “wrong” to say there’s no military option for North Korea — and he said the pressure was on China to prevent a war that could devastate the region.
The South Carolina Republican said Tuesday that President Donald Trump would not allow North Korea to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering a nuclear strike to the U.S.
“The only way they’re going to change (is) if they believe there’s a credible threat of military force on the table,” Graham told the “Today” show. “The Chinese are miscalculating Trump, and so are the North Koreans. He’s got to choose between homeland security and regional stability. Japan, South Korea, China will all be in the crosshairs of a war if we started one with North Korea, but if they get a missile that can hit California and maybe other parts of America.”
Military experts generally agree there’s no good option for military action, because it would immediately endanger millions in the region — but Graham disagrees.
“They’re wrong,” Graham said. “There is a military option to destroy North Korea’s program and North Korea itself. He’s not going to allow, President Trump, the ability of this madman to have a missile to hit America. If there’s going to be a war to stop it, it will be over there. If thousands die, they’re going to die over there — they’re not going to die here. He’s told me that to my face — and that may be provocative, but not really. When you’re president of the United States, where does your allegiance lie?”
NBC News’ Matt Lauer seemed astonished, and he asked if Graham was really willing to endanger the lives of so many people in China, Japan and South Korea.
“I’m saying it’s inevitable unless North Korea changes, because you’re making our president pick between regional stability and homeland security,” Graham said. “He’s having to make a choice that no president wants to make. They’ve kicked the can down the road for 20 years, there’s no place else to kick it. So there will be a war with North Korea over their missile program if they continue to try to hit America with an ICBM. He has told me that, I believe him, and if I were China, I would believe him, too, and do something about it.”
— TODAY (@TODAYshow) August 1, 2017
Democrats have a powerful case against Trump — but they keep making a key mistake
On the floor of the Senate, House impeachment managers have delivered a thorough, factual and compelling case for removing President Donald Trump from office. He abused his power by using his office to induce Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into launching investigations of his political enemies, and then he obstructed Congress in its efforts to uncover the details of this scheme.
The managers’ ability to present the evidence for these charges for hours on end has been impressive, and they’re earning plaudits for their furtive efforts, even though removal of the president remains supremely unlikely.
Internet cheers as Val Demings lays out President Donald Trump’s wrongdoing in powerful speech
On the third night of the impeachment trial, Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) stood up and forcefully laid out President Donald Trump's misconduct in Ukraine on the floor of the Senate.
Demings, a former police chief and a longtime voice for the president's removal, was roundly cheered on by commenters on Twitter:
Even Ronald Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan agrees the Senate must call witnesses
In a Thursday evening column, far-right commentator Peggy Noonan agreed that there should be witnesses called in the impeachment trial.
CNN capitol correspondent Manu Raju reported late in the evening that Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) was leaning against calling witnesses because it would be opposed by the White House and they will fight it at all costs.
The comments drew anger from CNN legal analyst Jeff Toobin and former Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein, who explained this is exactly what President Donald Trump wants.