Quantcast
Connect with us

Arizona judge considers ways to legally out-maneuver Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio

Published

on

An Arizona District Court judge is weighing arguments against throwing out charges against Arizona’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio in spite of President Donald Trump’s pardon.

According to LawNewz.com, District Court Judge Susan Bolton has yet to grant a motion by Arpaio’s attorneys to have all charges against him dismissed in the wake of the presidential pardon.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, she is reviewing arguments filed with her against dismissing the charges, said John Banzhaf at LawNewz, who quoted one document that said, “The president can’t use the pardon power to immunize lawless officials from consequences for violating people’s constitutional rights.”

Arguments lodged by Arpaio’s attorneys allege that “(t)he president’s pardon moots the case, and it warrants an automatic vacatur of all opinions, judgments, and verdicts related to the criminal charge.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ Justice Department has endorsed the argument of Arpaio’s team and said, “the government agrees that the Court should vacate all orders and dismiss the case as moot.”

Some have argued that the chief executive’s pardon power is “unlimited” and might include the ability to pardon anyone charged in, for example, the Mueller probe — up to and including himself.

However, Judge Bolton is reportedly examining historical jurisprudence on the matter, including arguments that the president’s pardon powers are limited “by later-enacted amendments, starting with the Bill of Rights. For example, were a president to announce that he planned to pardon all white defendants convicted of a certain crime but not all black defendants, that would conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Similarly, the arguments say, a president cannot use his pardon power to undercut the Courts’ attempts to to protect people from violations of their rights, including the right of Due Process. The president’s pardon, if granted, immunizes Apraio against the consequences of his unlawful acts and their impact on the rights of others.

Therefore, “the president cannot be allowed to weaponize the pardon power to circumvent the judiciary’s ability to enforce and protect constitutional rights,” say arguments against dropping all charges against Arpaio.

Bolton has asked both Arpaio and the Justice Department to draft briefs in favor of the pardon, which LawNewz argued defies a 1925 Supreme Court decision “which unanimously upheld a presidential pardon for a criminal contempt of court sentence; exactly the unusual type of pardon involved here.”

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Bolton’s refusal to grant the motion dropping charges against Arpaio may be the only legal challenge the pardon could ever see. Constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky, said LawNewz, said, “in theory, Judge Susan Bolton, the judge in the case, could say that, notwithstanding the pardon and notwithstanding Ex Parte Grossman [in 1925], she believes the law has changed sufficiently that she can go ahead and sentence Arpaio. Arpaio would appeal, and the Ninth Circuit could then affirm Judge Bolton.”

In such a ruling, Banzhaf wrote, Bolton could cite a 1987 ruling in which the Court said, “The ability to punish disobedience to judicial orders is regarded as essential to ensuring that the Judiciary has a means to vindicate its own authority without complete dependence on other Branches.”

ADVERTISEMENT

If the 9th Circuit upheld Bolton’s decision to sentence Arpaio in spite of the pardon, Trump and Arpaio would have no recourse but to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The maneuvering by Judge Bolton would be highly unusual, but Banzhaf noted, many judges are forging into new waters to beat back against what they see as Trump’s attacks on the courts and the rule of law.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Mike Pompeo’s meltdown during interview over Ukraine questions was ‘not the first time’: report

Published

on

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo screamed at NPR “All Things Considered” co-host Mary Louise Kelly for asking questions about Ukraine during an interview.

Pompeo has been implicated in the abuse of power and obstruction of Congress scandal for which Trump is being impeached.

The Trump administration cabinet official reportedly "cursed at her, dropping f-bombs, made her point to Ukraine on an unmarked map (she did)," according to NPR host Lulu Garcia-Navarro.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Republican Martha McSally absolutely destroyed by GOP consultant for her defense of Trump

Published

on

Interim-Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) was shut down on Twitter on Friday by a top Republican as she tried to defend President Donald Trump on Twitter.

House impeachment managers have argued that America cannot wait until the 2020 election to pass judgment on Trump, as the first article of impeachment was passed because the House of Representatives concluded he was attempting to cheat in the election.

"The president's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box. For we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won," Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) charged on Friday.

McSally said Schiff was wrong and judgment on Trump should be decided by the voters, even if Trump was caught cheating.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Mike Pompeo screamed at reporter she couldn’t find Ukraine on a map — she did and the interview was shut down

Published

on

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went off on an NPR reporter during an interview, according to a transcript of the full interview and the report from Kelly on air.

"All Things Considered" co-host Mary Louise Kelly has reported on national security and foreign policy for decades. Ahead of her interview with Pompeo, she cleared with the State Department that they could discuss Ukraine and Iran as part of their interview. It was approved. Yet, when the moment came, Pompeo lost his cool.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image