A white woman is still employed at the Cactus Jack restaurant in Fort Meyers, Florida, despite the fact that she was caught on camera going off on a racist tirade against a coworker.
Local news station Fox 4 reports that Cactus Jack employee Eileen Marcinkowski was filmed repeatedly yelling “You’re a n*gger!” at former coworker Orlando Ortega, who was fired from the restaurant shortly before the incident with Marcinkowski occurred.
Restaurant owner Jane Thursfield tells Fox 4 that Marcinkowski was actually provoked by Ortega, whom she alleges hit the woman in the face right before she went off on her racist rant.
“The lady in the video he actually did hit,” she explained to Fox 4. “She had blood on her face, she was bleeding.”
Despite this, however, the video does not show Marcinkowski with any blood on her face.
Additionally, Thursfield said that Marcinkowski’s use of racial slurs was inappropriate even if she was provoked by Ortega.
“Of course not, no, we don’t condone that at all,” she said.
For the time being, Thursfield says that Marcinkowski is still employed at the restaurant, although she says she plans to address the incident with the entire staff. She also emphasizes that the incident took place “off-the-clock” and “off business property.”
In a Facebook video posted over the weekend, Ortega denied doing anything to provoke Marcinkowski and said he planned to file a discriminatory lawsuit against the restaurant.
Watch the original video below.
Watergate’s John Dean thinks Trump wrote part of his legal team’s brief — because it’s so terrible
Former White House counsel for Richard Nixon, John Dean, explained that the legal brief out of President Donald Trump's White House was so bad that it had to have been dictated by Trump himself.
Saturday evening, Trump's legal team, chaired by Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House counsel Pat Cipollone, filed their own form of a legal brief that responded to the case filed by Democrats ahead of Tuesday's impeachment trial.
The document called the proceedings “constitutionally invalid” and claims House Democrats are staging a “dangerous attack” with a “brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election.”
WATCH: Prince Harry explains why he and Meghan are leaving the royal family — but promises ‘a life of service’
Prince Harry posted a video from an HIV/AIDS fundraiser his mother once supported, where he explained his methodology for leaving his profile role as a royal.
"I will continue to be the same man who holds his country dear," said Harry.
He went on to say that he doesn't intend to walk away and he certainly won't walk away from his causes and interests. "We intend to live a life of service."
In the speech, he thanked those who took him under their wing in the absence of his mother
"I hope you can understand that it's what it had come to," he said for why their family intends to step back.
‘You cannot expect anything but fascism’: Pedagogy theorist on how Trump ‘legitimated a culture of lying, cruelty and a collapse of social responsibility’
The impeachment of Donald Trump appears to be a crisis without a history, at least a history that illuminates, not just comparisons with other presidential impeachments, but a history that provides historical lessons regarding its relationship to a previous age of tyranny that ushered in horrors associated with a fascist politics in the 1930s. In the age of Trump, history is now used to divert and elude the most serious questions to be raised about the impeachment crisis. The legacy of earlier presidential impeachments, which include Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, provide a comparative historical context for analysis and criticism. And while Trump’s impeachment is often defined as a more serious constitutional crisis given his attempt to use the power of the presidency to advance his personal political agenda, it is a crisis that willfully ignores the conditions that gave rise to Trump’s presidency along with its recurring pattern of authoritarian behavior, policies, and practices. One result is that the impeachment process with its abundance of political theater and insipid media coverage treats Trump’s crimes as the endpoint of an abuse of power and an illegal act, rather than as a political action that is symptomatic of a long legacy of conditions that have led to the United States’ slide into the abyss of authoritarianism.