Quantcast
Connect with us

Accused Austin bomber Mark Conditt kept a blog where he outlined ‘conservative’ views

Published

on

The suspected Austin bomber described himself as a conservative and argued against same-sex marriage and abortion in a blog he maintained for a government class.

Mark Anthony Conditt blew himself up Wednesday after police surrounded him as they investigated five bombs that killed two people and injured four others this month in Austin, and the suspect left behind some clues on the website he set up six years ago, reported The Daily Beast.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-year-old Conditt was homeschooled, but an internet user matching his name, age and hometown set up the “Defining my Stance” website on the Blogger platform in early 2012.

He used the name “Tavar,” and described himself as a conservative but not very politically engaged.

Mark Conditt blog

“My name is Mark Conditt,” he posted in his bio. “I enjoy cycling, parkour, tennis, reading, and listening to music. I am not that politically inclined. I view myself as a conservative, but I don’t think I have enough information to defend my stance as well as it should be defended. The reasons I am taking this class is because I want to understand the US government, and I hope that it will help me clarify my stance, and then defend it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

His first post, made February 24, 2012, was on internet piracy, and he summarized a Daily Mail post on Megaupload.com and its founder, Kim Dotcom.

Other posts celebrated a column by ultra-conservative Fox News contributor Marc Thiessen (“I think that it is just plain dumb to release a terrorist, much less a senior one – no matter what he can provide”), and argued against same-sex marriage, “free abortion” and the sex offender registry.

“You have to really hate the guy to make him suffer for the rest of his life, even when his prison time is up,” Conditt wrote. “This sounds perfect for a serial rapist or pedophile, but its not such a great idea if something as trivial as public indecency or streaking can put you on the registry right alongside them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He also argued in favor of the death penalty, in reaction to a news report on seven Texas inmates who escaped in 2000 and killed a police officer.

“First, the whole premise that (ringleader George) Rivas welcomed death is outright wrong,” Conditt wrote. “If he had wanted or wished for death, he would have just shot himself, like his fellow Texas 7 escapee, Larry Harper, who committed suicide, rather than be captured and re-incarcerated. Instead, for 11 years he chose life by surrendering, instead. He fought against death during his trial. He fought against death with his appeals and asked to have his sentence commuted from death to life. None of these are the actions of a person willing to chose death/freedom over life.

“Second, Living criminals harm and murder, again – executed ones do not,” Conditt added. “Rivas was a known murderer, and had escaped prison once. If he had gotten life without parole, he could have escaped again.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Three GOP senators could force a rule change leading to Trump’s impeachment — here’s why McConnell might go for it

Published

on

According to a column written for Politico by a former senior adviser to multiple Republican lawmakers, there is a path to forcing Donald Trump from office that would only require three GOP senators to join forces with the Democrats.

Under the heading, "There’s a Surprisingly Plausible Path to Removing Trump From Office," Juleanna Glover -- who served as an adviser to former President George W. Bush and ex-Vice President Dick Cheney -- laid out a simple way to force an impeachment vote that would be conducted in secret, freeing GOP senators to turn on the president without fear of repercussions.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Send in the clowns: Impeachment is serious stuff, but the GOP wants a circus

Published

on

The impeachment of Donald Trump is not just a matter of holding the president accountable for his confessed plot to extort Ukraine at a time when Russia is engaged in both an invasion of that country and a cyber-invasion of the United States. This impeachment is also a mandatory warning to myriad potential Trump copycats that serving as a carrier of the political disease known as Trumpism is absolutely not a path to more winning, but a political death wish.

This article first appeared in Salon.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump goes on wild Biden conspiracy tweetstorm as public impeachment hearings threaten to expose his presidency

Published

on

President Donald Trump started firing off misleading tweets before sunrise to defend himself from the impeachment inquiry.

The president started tweeting a bit earlier than usual, at 6:25 a.m. EST, complaining about the public phase of the inquiry, which begins Wednesday with testimony from George Kent, a deputy assistant secretary of state, and Bill Taylor, a former ambassador and the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine.

Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, will testify Friday.

"Why is such a focus put on 2nd and 3rd hand witnesses, many of whom are Never Trumpers, or whose lawyers are Never Trumpers, when all you have to do is read the phone call (transcript) with the Ukrainian President and see first hand?" Trump tweeted.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image