Pro-Trump Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz and CNN’s chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin shouted over each other Wednesday evening when discussing whether President Donald Trump had the constitutional authority to fire former FBI Director James Comey last year.
Dershowitz conceded that it was “obvious” that the president fired Comey to end the Russia investigation and the act “was not OK” — but then argued that he had a constitutional right to do so.
“It was not illegal,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a crime.”
Toobin then chimed in saying that the criminality of the Comey firing “is a fundamental disagreement that Alan and I have.”
“If the president fires the FBI director to stop him from investigating the president himself, that is a corrupt motive, that is the definition of obstruction of justice,” he said. “The intent is the whole thing.”
Dershowitz went on to argue that “you never can have a crime where the intent is the whole thing.”
“You can’t have an illegal act when the president acts within his constitutional authority,” he said. “Metaphysically, you can’t have an act that is both constitutionally authorized under Article 1, under Article 2, and at the same time is criminal.”
As Toobin responded with examples of otherwise legal acts “made illegal by intent,” the Harvard Law professor repeatedly cut him off.
Watch below, via CNN:
Big hints lie in the official complaint against Derek Chauvin — and surprising details are left out: ex-prosecutor
In a column for CNN, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig reviewed the criminal complaint filed against ex-Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin and said it gives clues as to the direction prosecutors are likely to follow to convict the alleged killer of Georg Floyd -- but it also leaves out key elements of the case that should be brought before a jury.
As Honig wrote, the case against Chauvin is strong but may not go far enough.
Trump security advisor goes off on Antifa rant to duck grilling on president’s ‘vicious dogs’ protester threat
Appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" with Jake Tapper, White House National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien ducked directly defending the president's Saturday threat to use "vicious dogs and ominous weapons" of Washington D.C. protesters, by instead talking about supposed Antifa activity during the George Floyd protests.
After reading the president's tweet, host Tapper pressed, "Do you think messages like that are helping to unite the country and calm fears?”
With O'Brien noting, "[Trump] was trying to de-escalate. He didn’t want violence, he’s trying to stop the violence that we saw that took place overnight," he then went on to drag in reports being pushed by Donald Trump's administration that Antifa -- which he mentioned frequently during the entire interview -- had taken over the protests.
Atlanta mayor levels Trump for comments taunting George Floyd protesters: He’s ‘making it worse’
Appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday morning after yet another night of protests rocked her city, the mayor of Atlanta bluntly told Donald Trump to keep his mouth shut about the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers and the protests that have followed.
Speaking with host Jake Tapper, Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms was asked about comments the president has been making on Twitter about the protestors which have included threats of using "vicious dogs" and "ominous weapons."
"President Trump has been tweeting about the violent protests across the country. he vowed to step in and use, quote, 'the unlimited power of our military' and he suggested local officials should, quote, 'get tough and fight.' He's also talked about threatening 'the most vicious dogs and most ominous weapons I have ever seen' to use against protesters in Washington, D.C.," host Tapper began. "What do you make of the way the president has handled this crisis?"