Morning Joe hosts Mika Brzezinski,, Joe Scarborough -- screenshot
The panel on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" broke into their regularly scheduled discussion on the chaos of the White House to watch clips from President Donald Trump's call into "Fox & Friends" on Thursday morning, with host Joe Scarborough declaring Trump is now officially "unhinged."
Trump's rant -- which leaped from subject to subject where he attacked his own Justice Department, his personal attorney Michael Cohen, Democrats and basically everyone outside the White House -- contained more than a few questionable assertions which caused Scarborough to bluntly tell the president, "Everything you just said was wrong."
Specifically, Scarborough pushed back at Trump for attacking former FBI director James Comey's assertion in a memo about the president's sleepover in Russia.
"Those memos were about me and they are phony," Trump excitedly exclaimed. "He didn't write them accurately. For instance, I went to Russia for a day or so, a day or two, because I own the Miss Universe pageant. I went there to watch it because it was near Moscow, so I go to Russia -- everybody knows the planes are there. He said I didn't stay there, of course I stayed there. I stayed there a very short period of time but of course I stayed -- the memo says I left immediately."
"Everything you just said was wrong," a stunned Scarborough stated. "Everything Donald Trump just said there was wrong. He claimed he didn't spend the night. It wasn't Comey claiming he didn't spend the night."
"Comey said he seemed guilty because he kept saying over and over again, he didn't spend the night," Scarborough continued before passing sentence on Trump.
"The president is unhinged. You can hear it, he's unhinged. He keeps contradicting himself," Scarborough said. "He's talking about documents being classified that nobody said were classified at the time that Comey let them out -- nobody."
"It's wonderful, but can you imagine nobody is there grabbing the phone from him?" co-host Mika Brzezinski quipped.
"I don't want anyone grabbing the phone from him," Michael Avenatti, the attorney for adult star Stormy Daniels interjected. "I want him to appear every morning on Fox & Friends. Please, mister president, keep going on."
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew will testify in March to US lawmakers in Washington where the Chinese social media app faces accusations that it is beholden to the Communist Party in Beijing.
TikTok, whose parent company ByteDance is Chinese, is fighting for its survival in the United States with rising calls from mainly Republican lawmakers that the company should be outright banned for its links to Beijing.
Chew will give testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on March 23 after Republicans recently took over as the majority in the US House of Representatives.
"TikTok has knowingly allowed the ability for the Chinese Communist Party to access American user data," US representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who heads the committee, said in a statement on Monday.
"Americans deserve to know how these actions impact their privacy and data security, as well as what actions TikTok is taking to keep our kids safe from online and offline harms," she added.
Democrats have increasingly joined the groundswell of criticism against TikTok, and last month US President Joe Biden signed a law that bans the use of TikTok on government-issued devices.
This followed dozens of similar bans by US state governments and has put TikTok’s ability to remain a dominant tech player in the United States into sudden doubt.
To strengthen its position, TikTok for months held confidential talks with the US government to find a long-term arrangement that would satisfy any national security concerns.
A tentative proposal struck in August included direct oversight of TikTok USA by government officials and third-party companies.
But this arrangement has been held up amid public criticism by FBI Director Christopher Wray who said he continues to see TikTok as a threat.
"138 million users in America use TikTok on a regular basis, average about 90 minutes a day," said US Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat who co-heads the Senate’s Intelligence Committee.
"I'm not saying that the Communist party is driving the videos you see, but the fact is the algorithms that determine what you see on TikTok are determined out of Beijing by China," he added, speaking to CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday.
People are exposed to numerous chemicals throughout their lifetimes. These chemicals can be from the air, foods, personal care items, household products and medications. Unfortunately, exposure to certain chemicals can cause harmful health effects, including cancer. Substances that cause cancer are called carcinogens. Familiar examples include tobacco smoke, radon, asbestos and diesel engine exhaust.
To protect the health of the public, national and international health agencies evaluate many new and existing chemicals to determine if they are likely to be carcinogens in a process called cancer hazard identification. If agencies judge the chemicals to be carcinogenic, they conduct further assessments to determine the level of risk, and legislators may put regulations in place to limit, or completely halt, the production and use of these chemicals.
I am a scientist who studies how the human body processes foreign chemicals, like environmental pollutants and drugs, and the effects of these chemicals on health. As part of my work, I have participated in chemical and cancer hazard identifications for several agencies, including the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer. Here’s how chemicals can cause cancer, and how we classify chemicals based on on how carcinogenic they are – sometimes with controversial results.
The mechanisms behind how toxic chemicals can lead to cancer are complex.
After a person is exposed to a carcinogen, the chemical is generally absorbed into the body and distributed into different tissues. Once the chemical has moved into the cells, it often undergoes chemical reactions that convert it into other forms.
The products of these reactions can directly or indirectly affect the cell’s genes. Altering genes, which contain the cell’s instructions on how to produce specific molecules, or the processes that regulate them can ultimately result in dysfunctional cells if the genetic damage isn’t repaired. These cells don’t respond normally to cellular signals and can grow and divide at abnormal rates, which are characteristic features of cancer cells.
How are chemicals classified for carcinogenicity?
To help safeguard the public and reduce the incidence of cancer, several agencies have developed procedures to classify and categorize chemicals based on their potential to be carcinogenic.
Among them are the International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC Monographs; the National Toxicology Program, or NTP; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. In general, these agencies examine a critical question: How strong is the evidence that a substance causes cancer or biological changes that could be related to cancer in people? Understanding the procedures used to answer this question can help with interpreting the decisions these agencies make.
The procedures used by the IARC – because of its long history, credibility and strong international reputation – provide a good example of how this process works. It’s designed to be transparent and minimize bias, spanning over a year from selecting a chemical for evaluation to its final classification.
In this process, the IARC selects and invites a panel of scientific experts on the chemical to be evaluated. The panel does not conduct new research on its own, but carefully reviews all available papers in the scientific literature on the chemical’s carcinogenicity in cell and bacterial cultures, animals and people. To assess the strength of the evidence, the panel carefully considers the number of studies that are available and the consistency of the results, as well as the scientific quality and relevance of each study to cancer in people.
Chemicals can be carcinogenic to varying degrees.
After discussing and deliberating on the results, the panel makes a final consensus classification. This classification places the chemical into one of four groups: Group 1 indicates that the chemical is carcinogenic to people, Group 2A that it is probably carcinogenic to people, Group 2B that it is possibly carcinogenic to people, and Group 3 that it is not classifiable. A Group 3 classification does not indicate that the compound is not carcinogenic, but rather that the panel could not draw a conclusion about whether there is a causal link between the chemical and cancer from available studies. For example, exposure to several chemicals can make it unclear which ones are responsible for a later cancer diagnosis.
During its 50-year history, the IARC has evaluated and classified over 1,000 chemicals and other hazards. Many of these classifications have had broad societal implications, such as those for tobacco smoke, ambient air pollution, diesel engine exhaust and processed meat. All were classified as Group 1, or confirmed to be carcinogenic to humans. Electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phones was classified as Group 2B, or possibly carcinogenic, and red meat was classified as Group 2A, or probably carcinogenic. Though they haven’t directly led to any regulations, these classifications have motivated additionalscientific studies. While the IARC can advise regulators, it’s up to countries to implement policies.
It is important to note that classifications do not indicate the size of the risk but are important in supporting health agencies worldwide as they implement actions to limit exposures to known, probable and possible carcinogens. In 2020, when the IARC classified opium consumption as Group 1, or carcinogenic to humans, this led the government of Iran to implement policies to reduce opium addiction in the country.
Controversies in carcinogenicity classifications
Though classifications from the IARC are based on robust scientific evidence, some have proved to be controversial.
For instance, in 2015, the IARC evaluated the carcinogenicity of glyphosate, a widely used weedkiller found in products like Roundup, which is produced by Monsanto. A panel of 17 experts from 11 countries systematically reviewed results from over 1,000 scientific studies and classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” or Group 2A.
Owing to its widespread usage and multibillion-dollar market value, a cancer classification decision for glyphosate has significant potential financial and legal consequences. Following its evaluation, the IARC received support from many regulatory and scientific bodies but was criticized by others. Other agencies, includingthe EPA, have seen similar controversies and politicization of their hazard identifications and regulatory decisions.
I believe that agencies like the IARC play a critical role in evaluating the health effects of certain chemicals and in reducing exposure to potential carcinogens. Helping people better understand how these agencies evaluate chemicals can go a long way to ensure transparency and help protect environmental and public health.
Canadian cardinal Marc Ouellet, who has been accused of sexually assaulting a woman, has stepped down from a top Holy See position due to his age, the Vatican said Monday.
Ouellet, 78, who has strongly denied the claims against him, is retiring as head of the Vatican's Dicastery, or department, for bishops, it said.
Pope Francis "has accepted the resignation presented, due to (the cardinal's) reaching the age limit," the Vatican statement said.
The Canadian, once considered a strong candidate to be pope, has been accused of abusing a female intern from 2008 to 2010, when he was archbishop of Quebec.
He was named in court documents in August relating to a class action suit targeting more than 80 members of the clergy in the archdiocese of Quebec.
In December, Ouellet said he had filed a defamation suit against the woman who accused him, "to restore my reputation".
He is also facing a second complaint made by a woman in 2020, first revealed by French weekly Golias earlier this month and confirmed by the Quebec diocese on Monday.
The complaint was forwarded to the Vatican, a spokesperson for the diocese told AFP.
As prefect, Ouellet headed up the Vatican office that suggests bishop appointments to the pope.
He will be replaced by US bishop Robert Francis Prevost.
