Quantcast
Connect with us

‘I’d do it again’: Former VP Dick Cheney insists waterboarding not torture in Fox News interview

Published

on

Appearing on Fox News with host Maria Bartiromo, former Vice President Dick Cheney said he disagrees with the international community that calls waterboarding prisoners “torture,” and said he would advocate for it once again if asked.

In a taped interview with the Fox host, Cheney applauded the nomination of Gina Haspel to head the CIA while admitting that he didn’t know her personally, despite the fact that she helped oversee the black ops program that interrogated prisoners after the 9/11 attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

That was when Bartiromo asked the vice president who served under former President George W. Bush about torture.

“We have had 17 years to digest what happened after 9/11, and, of course, much has been made about the torture programs and the interrogation programs,” the Fox host suggested. “You’ve been vocal about this, that at the time you said this was the right thing to do. Correct?”

“I’ve been very vocal about it, I believed in it, I was heavily involved in getting it set up,” Cheney admitted. “I’m not one of those persons who calls it torture, an awful lot of people do. But it wasn’t and it was set up in a way that was consistent with our fundamental statutes and agreements that were in place — and it worked.”

Pointing out that “waterboarding was applied to only three individuals,” Cheney stated that the CIA later produced a study saying one of those tortured was a “preeminent source on al Qaeda.”

“I supported it [waterboarding] and I do to this day and I’m prepared to defend it, debate it and argue it,” he confessed, before later adding he “would do it again.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Washington Post, a study the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that “the CIA’s use of torture and other harsh interrogation techniques did not produce unique, critical intelligence that had not been replicated elsewhere or obtained through other means.”

You can watch the video below via Fox News:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

SCOTUS conservatives OK Trump sweeping power to ban immigrants if they might some day use public services like welfare

Published

on

In yet another 5-4 decision conservatives on the U.S. Supreme Court have blocked a district court judge's ruling and are allowing President Donald Trump to implement a draconian rule that allows immigrants to be banned from entering or staying in the U.S. if the administration's immigration officials believe that at some point in the future they might access government resources or public services, like welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, or public housing assistance.

All four liberals on the court opposed the motion, CBS News reports.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Anti-impeachment conservative admits John Bolton just ‘blew up’ Trump’s entire defense

Published

on

Conservative Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor who writes regularly for the National Review, has long been opposed to the impeachment of President Donald Trump.

However, he admits in his latest column that new revelations from former Trump national security adviser John Bolton mean that the president's entire defense strategy against impeachment has now been effectively "blown up."

He starts off his column by chiding the president and his team for trying to dishonestly claim that there was never a quid-pro-quo agreement related to military aid to Ukraine, while also trying to make the case that the president "did nothing wrong."

Continue Reading
 

Commentary

Senate Republicans may have realized they neutered themselves for nothing after Bolton’s revelations

Published

on

I argued last week the Senate Republicans neutered themselves when they voted down amendments creating procedures worthy of “the world’s greatest deliberative body.”

All 53 decided against issuing new subpoenas, entering to new evidence and calling for new witnesses. They decided against accountability, transparency and due process.

This article was originally published at The Editorial Board

As a consequence, they created a kangaroo court mocking America’s separation of powers. As a consequence, they revealed themselves, as one Twitter follower put it, to be “a party of moral relativism, ethical nihilism and legal sophism.” Or, like, fascism.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image