New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a former writer for the Wall Street Journal, on Monday blasted conservative media outlets like Fox News for backing President Donald Trump as he threatens to interfere with the Department of Justice.
Stephens told MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle that Trump’s demand that the DOJ investigate itself for allegedly spying on the Trump campaign should be a “red line” for Fox News and other right-wing outlets.
“Every single time that Democratic presidents have come anywhere close to this territory, whether it was under President Clinton and Janet Reno’s tenure [as Attorney General], President Obama and Attorney General [Eric Holder], Republicans have screamed bloody murder, ‘The president is trying to politicize the Justice Department,'” Stephens explained. “This is supposed to have been a conservative red line, you can never do this.”
“And now the same conservative media that I know so well that spent years screaming about Obama or Clinton’s alleged attempts to politicize Justice are encouraging the president to take precisely the step that he has,” the Times columnist continued. “To find anything comparable in American history, you probably have to go back to the early 19th century before the bureaucratization of the various departments of government, when all of these jobs were intensely political to find anything analogous.”
According to Stephens, Trump’s actions closely resemble that of strongman leaders in Third World countries.
“It’s a brilliant tactic both at a bureaucratic level as well as at a media level,” he observed. “Because it just throws the whole issue into this sort of mass confusion where people have lots of opinions and people say it’s controversial, it’s not clear cut.”
“What it is is a clear cut attempt to politicize the Justice Department,” Stephens concluded.
Watch the video below from MSNBC.
Trump is trying Middle East Peace plan 2.0 after the first one flopped
President Donald Trump is scheduled to submit his second Middle East peace plan after the first one senior son-in-law Jared Kushner came up with didn't go over very well.
"We will get this done," Trump claimed in May 2017.
“We'll start a process which hopefully will lead to peace,” Trump said. “Over the course of my lifetime, I've always heard that perhaps the toughest deal to make is the deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Let's see if we can prove them wrong, okay?”
Rage-filled Trump has crippled his presidency because he can’t let go of a grudge no matter how small: report
According to a report in Politico, many of Donald Trump's problems are the direct result of his inability to get over the smallest of slights leading him to make poor decisions because he can't see his way to let go of a grudge.
The report notes, "Whether in the privacy of his clubs or out on the campaign trail, the president can’t help but hold onto a grudge. Even as Trump heads into an election year with a record that he claims ranks him among the best presidents of all time, political grievances continue to drive everything from policy decisions to rally speeches to some of the biggest scandals of his presidency — including his impeachment."
George Conway reveals Trump is being shunned by law firms because young lawyers ‘want nothing to do with him’
Conservative attorney George Conway asserted in a column over the weekend that President Donald Trump's history of mistreating law firms is catching up with him.
In a Sunday op-ed for The Washington Post, Conway explains that Trump is now faced with sparse choices for legal representation in his impeachment trial after years of not paying attorneys and generally being a bad client.
Pointing to Trump's choice of Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr, Conway writes:
?The president has consistently encountered difficulty in hiring good lawyers to defend him. In 2017, after Robert S. Mueller III became special counsel, Trump couldn’t find a high-end law firm that would take him as a client. His reputation for nonpayment preceded him: One major Manhattan firm I know had once been forced to eat bills for millions in bond work it once did for Trump. No doubt other members of the legal community knew of other examples.