Quantcast
Connect with us

Supreme Court expert explains how Kennedy’s retirement will take civil rights gains in the ‘opposite direction’

Published

on

Americans can expect to see abortion rights and civil rights for LGBTQ people chipped away after the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, one expert warned MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Attorney and law professor Tom Goldstein, co-founder of the SCOTUS Blog, told host Joe Scarborough that Republican legislators would not likely undo same-sex marriage or directly challenge Roe v. Wade — but he said they undo legal protections for millions.

“The big issues that Americans care about, things like abortion, Justice Kennedy being
the fifth vote to uphold the core of Roe v. Wade, affirmative action is probably on the chopping block right now,” Goldstein said.

“We have areas of campaign finance law,” he continued, “where the conservatives could go still further in limiting, eliminating restrictions on contributions. Justice Kennedy (was) a critical vote when it comes to same-sex marriage, for example.”

Kennedy gained a reputation as a swing vote on close decisions, but Goldstein said he had recently been a reliable conservative.

“So even though this term he voted in 14 different cases with the conservatives to provide a fifth vote, and zero cases with the liberals, he still over the course of years, was essential on a number of these issues,” Goldstein said. “You could really expect all of those to head in the opposite direction.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Goldstein said same-sex marriage would likely remain legal, but he said conservatives could roll back gains in other areas.

“When it comes to gay rights, I would say same-sex is probably institutionalized in the country,” he said. “But when it comes to outstanding issues like employment discrimination, a conservative majority would head back in the opposite direction of expanding rights for gay americans or same-sex couples.”

Goldstein also said congressional Republicans would not likely overturn abortion rights, but he said state legislatures would attack the Roe v. Wade ruling on a number of fronts.

“When it comes it abortion, I think that judicial conservatives have been relatively savvy in saying we don’t need to see Roe v. Wade overruled, which might cause a big reaction in the country,” he said. “But they can still cut it back a lot and send a signal to the states they can adopt longer waiting periods, more restrictions on the kind of facilities that can offer abortion services and that sort of thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“So as a practical matter, I would say the abortion right is going to get narrowed probably a lot,” Goldstein added.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Honduran forces fire on students, 5 hurt: officials

Published

on

Honduran military police opened fire on protesting students at a university on Monday, wounding at least five, campus and hospital officials said.

Hundreds of students at the National Autonomous University of Honduras were demanding the resignation of the country's president, Juan Orlando Hernandez, after demonstrations against him intensified last week when three people were killed in protests.

"About 40 military police entered the university campus without authorization," Armando Sarmiento, director of institutional development at the Tegucigalpa-based university, told AFP.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Health care price transparency: Fool’s gold, or real money in your pocket?

Published

on

The news is full of stories about monumental surprise hospital bills, sky-high drug prices and patients going bankrupt. The government’s approach to addressing this, via an executive order that President Trump signed June 24, 2019, is to make hospitals post their list prices online so that patients supposedly can comparison shop. But this is fool’s gold – information that doesn’t address the real question about why these prices are so high in the first place.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Running while brown: How Texas’ Julián Castro is navigating white presidential politics

Published

on

By the time his plane touched down in California at the end of a whirlwind week, Julián Castro had set an early political benchmark in the crowded presidential race.

It was early April, and the former mayor and housing secretary had just released a sweeping immigration policy platform, garnering national headlines and widespread praise from immigration reform advocates who went as far as calling his proposals “exactly what we need in this moment.”

Castro was still struggling to break from the pack, but he was the first in the field with a detailed plan to tackle the one issue that could come to define the 2020 presidential campaign. Yet when he sat down for an interview on comedian Bill Maher’s television show, the host instead catalogued Castro’s proposal in terms that the white men also running for president would surely never face.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH 

Trump endorses killing journalists, like Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Online ad networks are now targeting sites that cover acts of violence against dissidents, LGBTQ people and people of color.

Learn how you can help.
close-link